Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Observations and the probabilistic situation calculus

2002

Abstract

In this article we propose a Probabilistic Situation Calculus logical language to represent and reason with knowledge about dynamical worlds in which actions have uncertain effects. Two essential tasks are addressed when reasoning about change in worlds: Probabilistic Temporal Projection and Probabilistic Belief Update. Uncertain effects are modeled by dividing an action into two subparts: a deterministic input (agent produced) and a probabilistic reaction (nature produced). The probability distributions of the reactions are assumed to be known.

References (16)

  1. Center for Logic and Computation, Departamento de Matemática, IST, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal. email: pmat@math.ist.utl.pt. Supported by FCT SFRH/BPD/5625/2001 and the FibLog initiative.
  2. Applied Mathematics Center, Departamento de Matemática, IST, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal. email: apacheco@math.ist.utl.pt
  3. Unfortunately J. Pinto passed away in an accident while this paper was being prepared. References
  4. F. Bacchus, J. Halpern, and H. Levesque. Reasoning about noisy sensors and effectors in the Situation Calculus. Artificial Intelligence, 111(1-2):171-208, 1999.
  5. C. Baral and L. Tuan. Reasoning about Actions in a Prob- abilistic Setting. In Commonsense 2001, Fifth Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, 2001. http://www.cs.nyu.edu/faculty/davise/commonsense01/.
  6. G. Fishman. Monte-Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications 2nd Ed. Springer Verlag, 1996.
  7. H. Grosskreutz and G. Lakemeyer. Turning High-Level Plans into Robot Programs in Uncertain Domains. In ECAI, 2000.
  8. H. Grosskreutz and G. Lakemeyer. Belief Update in the pGOLOG Framework. In Commonsense 2001, Fifth Sympo- sium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, 2001. http://www.cs.nyu.edu/faculty/davise/commonsense01/.
  9. P. Mateus, A. Pacheco, J. Pinto, A. Sernadas, and C. Sernadas. Probabilistic situation calculus. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2001. To appear.
  10. J. Pinto. Temporal Reasoning in the Situation Calculus. PhD thesis, Depart- ment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, February 1994. URL = ftp://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/˜cogrob/jpThesis.ps.Z.
  11. J. Pinto, A. Sernadas, C. Sernadas, and P. Mateus. Non-determinism and un- certainty in the Situation Calculus. In Proceedings of the 12th International Florida AI Research Symposium, FLAIRS'99, pages 454-460. AAAI Press, 1999.
  12. J. Pinto, A. Sernadas, C. Sernadas, and P. Mateus. Non-determinism and uncertainty in the Situation Calculus. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge Based Systems, 8(2), 2000.
  13. D. Poole. Decision theory, the Situation Calculus, and conditional plans. Linköping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science, 3(8), 1998. http://www.ep.liu.se/ea/cis/1998/008/.
  14. R. Reiter. The Frame Problem in the Situation Calculus: A Simple Solution (sometimes) and a completeness result for goal regression, pages 359-380. Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation: Papers in Honor of John McCarthy. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1991.
  15. R. Reiter. Knowledge in action: Logical foundations for describ- ing and implementing dynamical systems. Book Draft, available from http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/cogrobo, 2000.
  16. S.I. Resnick. A Probability Path. Birkhäuser Boston Inc., Boston, MA, 1999.