Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Confucian Democracy and Equality

https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2010.511026

Abstract

*Please check out my more recent article, "Confucian democracy as popular sovereignty" (forthcoming 2019) Abstract: “Confucian democracy” is considered oxymoronic because Confucianism is viewed as lacking an idea of equality among persons necessary for democracy. Against this widespread opinion, this article argues that Confucianism presupposes a uniquely Confucian idea of equality and that therefore a Confucian conception of democracy distinct from liberal democracy is not only conceptually possible but also morally justifiable. This article engages philosophical traditions of East and West by, first, reconstructing the prevailing position based on Joshua Cohen’s political liberalism; second, articulating a plausible conception of Confucian democracy predicated on Confucian conceptions of persons and political participation from the Mencian tradition; and third, exposing the implausibility of the prevailing position in light of the articulation.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What are the main arguments against Confucian democracy?add

The analysis reveals that Confucian democracy is often deemed impossible due to its alleged lack of an idea of equality essential for democracy, as posited by Joshua Cohen. Specifically, a key argument is that Confucian societies, considered decent nonliberal peoples, lack the liberal conception of persons necessary for democratic participation.

How does Confucian personhood inform the notion of equality?add

The research establishes that Confucian personhood posits an inherent moral capacity that equates all individuals in their potential for moral self-realization. This conception asserts that all Confucian persons possess equal moral potentials, forming a unique basis for a Confucian idea of equality.

What is the implication of collective self-determination for Confucian politics?add

The paper argues that Confucian politics can exemplify collective self-determination, where participatory processes align with Cohen's democratic framework. Despite differing from liberal democratic norms, Confucian systems can be justified as democratic by adhering to the common good and engaging in moral governance.

How does Jeong Do-Jeon's theory connect to modern governance concepts?add

Jeong advocates a Confucian governance model emphasizing moral integrity and public service, paralleling modern democratic principles like meritocracy and accountability. His proposals include mechanisms for citizen participation and checks against governmental corruption, anticipating contemporary democratic structures.

What role does moral exemplarity play in Confucian leadership?add

The concept of moral exemplarity dictates that leaders, referred to as junzis, must embody moral values and act in accordance with the common good. This model of leadership is rooted in the belief that moral integrity is essential for achieving societal harmony and effective governance.

References (32)

  1. Beitz, Charles. 2001. "Human Rights as a Common Concern." American Political Science Review 95 (2001):269-83.
  2. ______. 2000. "Rawls's Law of Peoples." Ethics 110:669-96.
  3. Bell, Daniel. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  4. Chan, Joseph. 2006. Political philosophy, Confucian. In E.Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge. Retrieved August 31, 2008, from http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/S102SECT2
  5. Chan, Wing-tsit. 1955. "The Evolution of the Confucian Concept Jen." Philosophy East and West 4 (4) (January): 295-319.
  6. Chung, Chai-sik. 1985. "Chông Tojôn: 'Architect' of Yi Dynasty Government and Ideology." The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea, edited by de Bary and Haboush. NY: Columbian University Press.
  7. Cohen, Joshua. 2006. "Is There a Human Right to Democracy?" C.Sypnowich, ed., The Egalitarian Conscience. New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. ______. 2004. "Minimalism about Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope for." Journal of Political Philosophy 12/2: 190-213.
  9. ______. 2003. "For a Democratic Society." Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Samuel Freeman. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  10. ______. 1999. "Reflections on Habermas on Democracy." Ratio Juris, Vol. 12 No. 4:385-416.
  11. ______. 1998. "Democracy and Liberty." Deliberative Democracy, edited by J.Elster. Cambridge University Press.
  12. ______. 1997. "Deliberation and democratic legitimacy." Deliberative Democracy, edited by Bohman and Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  13. ______. 1996. "Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy." Democracy and Difference, edited by S.Benhabib. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  14. ______. 1994. "A More Democratic Liberalism: Political Liberalism." Michigan Law Review 92. Cua, A.S. 1996. "The Conceptual Framework of Confucian Ethical Thought." Journal of Chinese Philosophy 23.
  15. Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. "Confucianism and Democracy." Journal of Democracy 6.2:20-33.
  16. Fung, Yu-lan. 1948. A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. Edited by D.Bodde. New York: Macmillan.
  17. Gutmann, Amy. 2003. Identity in Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  18. Hall, David and Roger Ames. 1999. The Democracy of the Dead. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court. ______. 1987. Thinking through Confucius. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  19. Han, Young-Woo. 1999. The Architect of the Chosôn Dynasty: Jeong Do-Jeon (in Korean). Seoul, Korea: Ji-shik-san-eop co.
  20. Herr, Ranjoo Seodu. 2009. "Democracy in Decent Nonliberal Nations: A Defense." Philosophical Forum 40/3. by the order of King Seong (成宗). In reconstructing his theory, I rely on its Korean translation (2006) as well as the exegesis provided by Han 1999. See also, Chung 1985.
  21. Many of Jeong's ideas were adopted by successive Chosôn kings, incorporated into the Chosôn Constitution (Kyeung-guk-dae-jeon), and implemented in various degrees throughout the dynasty's 500 year history.
  22. In Analects 12.17, it is stated that "To govern (zheng 政) is to rectify (zheng 正)"; see also, 13.6, 13.13. 15 For a survey of how min was used in various Confucian sources, see Hall and Ames (1987), pp.140-44.
  23. Cf. Mencius 4A.9. However, Confucius defends a just war in Analects 14.22.
  24. J.Chan (2006);
  25. Bell, p.185.
  26. Han even argues that Jeong may have realized that "hereditary absolute monarchy is not compatible with the politics of minbon (民本)" (p.185).
  27. For more on Chosôn institutions, see Chung, p.68.
  28. Even in the United States, statements that denounce fundamental societal values considered sacred -e.g., "the right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness"-would be harshly criticized, if not legally prohibited. 22 For more on this, see Herr's "intra-cultural pluralism" (2009).
  29. Moral capacity itself is culturally neutral and can be characterized and develop in many different ways in different cultural contexts.
  30. Think about the limits that the United States imposes not only on not-yet-naturalized immigrants, but also on naturalized citizens in running for public office, e.g.
  31. See, for example, Rawls 1999, pp. 70-78. Bell's advocacy of the "Xianshiyuan" in Confucian democracy seems to be in line with this line of reasoning (pp.167).
  32. Institutions of constitutionalism can also be found in the Chosôn period. See, Chaihark Hahm, "Constitutionalism, Confucian Civic Virtue, and Ritual Propriety"; Jongryn Mo, "The Challenge of Accountability," both in Bell and Hahm (eds.), Confucianism for the Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).