Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction: Have You Ever Been Human?
References

Posthuman disability studies

Profile image of Katherine Runswick-ColeKatherine Runswick-Cole

2014, Subjectivity

https://doi.org/10.1057/SUB.2014.15
visibility

…

description

20 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

This article explores the human through critical disability studies and the theories of Rosi Braidotti. We ask: What does it mean to be human in the twenty-first century and in what ways does disability enhance these meanings? In addressing this question we seek to work through entangled connections of nature, society, technology, medicine, biopower and culture to consider the extent to which the human might be an outdated phenomenon, replaced by Braidotti's posthuman condition. We then introduce disability as a political category, an identity and a moment of relational ethics. Critical disability studies, we argue, are perfectly at ease with the posthuman because disability has always contravened the traditional classical humanist conception of what it means to be human. Disability also invites a critical analysis of the posthuman. We examine the ways in which disability and posthuman work together, enhancing and complicating one another in ways that raise important questions about the kinds of life and death we value. We consider three of Braidotti's themes in relation to disability: (i) Life beyond the self: Rethinking enhancement; (ii) Life beyond the species: Rethinking animal; (iii) Life beyond death: Rethinking death. We conclude by advocating a posthuman disability studies that responds directly to contemporary complexities around the human while celebrating moments of difference and disruption.

Related papers

Working the edges of Posthuman disability studies: theorising with disabled young people with life‐limiting impairments
Dan Goodley

Sociology of Health & Illness, 2019

This paper is built upon an assumption: that social theory can be generated through a meaningful engagement with a co-researcher group of disabled young people. Our co-researchers are theoretical provocateurs and theorists in their own right who, through their activism and writing, are challenging us to reconsider the meaning of life, death and disability. Their work on our funded Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) project has enabled us to consider the promise and potential of humanist and posthuman epistemologies, theories, methodologies, interventions and activisms. The paper introduces the research, the authors of this paper (academics and co-researchers) and then explores three layers of analysis that work the edges of posthuman thinking; sovereign and assembled selves; affects and desires; mourning and affirmation. We conclude by asserting that as a research team we are engaging with a DisHuman approach to theory and activism: one that blends the pragmatics of humanism with posthuman possibilities.

View PDFchevron_right
The Question of Disability in the Post-Human Debate. Critical Remarks La Cuestión De La Discapacidad en El Debate Post-Humano. Observaciones Críticas
Chiara Gatti

2014

The issue of disability represents a test case for the sustainability -practical and theoretical -of transhumanist theories that lead to the advent of a post-human era. In fact, dealing with mankind implies also the possibility that man has a disability. So, seeing whether, in the post-human debate, persons with disability are respected, will show us if every man is respected. In this paper we start by analyzing the definition of disability given by the post-human theorists. As we will see, this definition is deficient because it is strictly linked with the transhumanists' refusal of the distinction between therapeutic treatment and enhancement. The field of enhancement is very wide, and the moral judgment on it cannot be generalized. Nowadays, many developments made possible by human enhancement theories remain only speculated upon. However, those theories are already influential in the field of studying the beginning of life. Indeed, the possibility "to choose children" is real: here the issue of disability is decisive and the risk of discrimination is very high. So, looking at the issue of disability will allow us to explore the ethical weight of the post-human project. In the background, it will be possible to glimpse the question of what is the essence of man, an issue not considered enough in the post-human debate. On the contrary, it is a fundamental question which should be answered before proceeding to a substantial alteration of humanity.

View PDFchevron_right
Disability and the Theory of Complex Embodiment--For Identity Politics in a New Register
Tobi Sievers
View PDFchevron_right
Disability as Microcosm: the Boundaries of the Human Body
Elizabeth DePoy

Societies, 2012

In this paper, we query the legitimacy of the atypical body for membership, quasi-membership, or exclusion from the category of human. Geneticized, branded, and designed as not normal, undesirable, and in need of change, embodied disablement can provide an important but circumvented analysis of the explicit and implicit nature of the legitimate human body, its symbolism, and responses that such bodies elicit from diverse local through global social and cultural entities. Building on and synthesizing historical and current work in the sociology of the body, in disability studies, in cyborg and post-human studies, this paper begins to ask questions about the criteria for human embodiment that are violated by interpretations of disability and then met with a range of responses from body revision to denial of the viability of life. Given the nascent emergence of this important topic, this paper chronicles the theory, questions and experiences that have provoked questions and posited the need for more substantive theory development and verification.

View PDFchevron_right
Disability/Anthropology: Rethinking the Parameters of the Human
Faye Ginsburg

Current Anthropology, 2020

View PDFchevron_right
Transhumanism and Disability
Rafael De Asís

This paper examines the transhumanist approach to disability focusing on its defining feature: human enhancement. The study of what underlies the philosophy of enhancement allows to connect original humanism (lying at the foundations of modern human rights theory) with the transhumanist discourse. Both humanists and transhumanists, but particularly transhumanists, understand human nature in a way that discriminates against persons with disabilities. Diversity-based humanism comes in response to this, allowing to address the role of emerging technologies vis-à-vis disability.

View PDFchevron_right
Posthuman Risks? Some Thoughts on Posthuman Disability Studies and‚ Strategic Humanism
Rebecca Maskos

Humanity Under Duress, 2020

View PDFchevron_right
Toward a Critical and Comparative Anthropology of Disability
Joshua Reno

Social Analysis

This article places anthropology in dialogue with critical disability studies (CDS) in order to reassess historical and emerging ethnographic readings of difference. We argue that one unintended consequence of a lack of attention to disability in anthropology, generally, has been an impoverished conception of personhood and power. Building on insights from CDS and the ethnographic literature, we show how non-normative bodies and minds can play a critical role in relationships with non-human others and exemplary persons. Looking beyond hegemonic and secular ideas of disability as a form of misfortune or lack not only offers alternatives for being with disability, in keeping with the aims of CDS, but also shows new directions for comparative discussions of power and difference.

View PDFchevron_right
Disability as Microcosm
stephen Gilson

In this paper, we query the legitimacy of the atypical body for membership, quasi-membership, or exclusion from the category of human. Geneticized, branded, and designed as not normal, undesirable, and in need of change, embodied disablement can provide an important but circumvented analysis of the explicit and implicit nature of the legitimate human body, its symbolism, and responses that such bodies elicit from diverse local through global social and cultural entities. Building on and synthesizing historical and current work in the sociology of the body, in disability studies, in cyborg and post-human studies, this paper begins to ask questions about the criteria for human embodiment that are violated by interpretations of disability and then met with a range of responses from body revision to denial of the viability of life. Given the nascent emergence of this important topic, this paper chronicles the theory, questions and experiences that have provoked questions and posited the need for more substantive theory development and verification.

View PDFchevron_right
Disability studies after the ontological turn: a return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism
Michael Feely

Over recent decades, poststructuralist theories have allowed critical disability scholars to challenge essentialist understandings of the human species and to contest discourses which divide humans into ‘normal’/‘impaired’ subjects with respect to a wide – and ever expanding – range of corporeal and cognitive traits. For critics, however, these theories are deeply flawed. By focusing primarily on language, poststructuralism shifts our critical attention away from the often harsh material realities of life for disabled people. This has led some to turn to critical realism and to effectively reessentialise impairment. In this article, I wish to consider an alternative approach. I suggest that the recent ‘ontological turn’ in social theory has seen the emergence of new-materialist approaches – including Deleuze and Guattari’s ontology of assemblage and methodology of assemblage analysis – which allow us to consider disability as a material phenomenon without a return to essentialism.

View PDFchevron_right

References (35)

  1. Boxall, K. (2013) In defence of normal. Keynote presentation to Normalcy 2013, Theorising the mundane, 7-8 September. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Hallam University.
  2. Braidotti, R. (1994) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contempor- ary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
  3. Braidotti, R. (2002) Metamorphoses: Towards A Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  4. Braidotti, R. (2003) Becoming woman, or sexual difference revisited. Theory, Culture & Society 20(3): 43-64.
  5. Braidotti, R. (2006) Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory Culture Society 23(7-8): 197-208.
  6. Braidotti, R. (2013) The Posthuman. London: Polity.
  7. Campbell, F.K. (2009) Contours of Ableism: Territories, Objects, Disability and Desire. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987) A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
  9. Feely, M. (2014) A DeleuzoGuattarian assemblage analysis of the treatment of sexuality within the specific material-semiotic context of a particular intellectual disability service. University of Belfast: Unpublished PhD thesis.
  10. Goodley, D. (2007) Becoming rhizomatic parents: Deleuze, guattari and disabled babies. Disability & Society 22(2): 145-160.
  11. Goodley, D. (2011) Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.
  12. Goodley, D. (2013) Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability and Society 28(5): 631-644.
  13. Goodley, D. (2014) Dis/ability Studies: Theorising Ableism and Disablism. London: Routledge.
  14. Goodley, D. and Runswick Cole, K. (in press) Becoming dishuman: Thinking about the human through disability. Discourse: A Cultural Politics of Education.
  15. Graby, S. and Greenstein, A. (2013) Supported Autonomy: Disability and Assistance beyond Modernism and Post-modernism. Theorising Normalcy and the Mundane 2013. Sheffield Hallam University.
  16. Gregory, S. (1991) Mother's and their deaf children. In: E. Lloyd. (ed.) Motherhood: Meanings, Practices and Ideologies. London: Sage.
  17. Kafer, A. (2013) Feminist, Queer, Crip, Bloomington. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  18. Lacan, J. (1977) Ecrits. A Selection. New York: Norton.
  19. Liddiard, K. (2012) (S)Exploring Disability. University of Warwick, Unpublished PhD Thesis.
  20. Liddiard, K. (2014) The work of disabled identities in intimate relationships. Disability & Society 29(1): 115-128.
  21. Mallett, R. and Runswick-Cole, K. (2014) Approaching Disability: Critical Issues and Perspectives. London: Routledge.
  22. McLaughlin, J., Goodley, D., Clavering, E. and Fisher, P. (2008) Families Raising Disabled Children: Enabling Care and Social Justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  23. McRuer, R. (2006) Compulsory able-bodiedness and queer/disabled existence. In: L. Davis (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge, pp. 301-308.
  24. Meekosha, H. and Shuttleworth, R. (2009) What's so 'critical' about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights 15(1): 47-76.
  25. Michalko, R. (1999) The Two-in-One: Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  26. Puar, J.K. (2009) Prognosis time: Towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity. Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 19(2): 161-172.
  27. Puar, J. (2012) 'I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess': Becoming-intersectional of assemblage theory. Philosophia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 2(1): 49-66.
  28. Reeve, D. (2012) Cyborgs, cripples and iCrip: Reflections of the contribution of Haraway to disability studies. In: D. Goodley, B. Hughes and L. Davis (eds.) Disability and Social Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 91-111.
  29. Rose, N. (2001) The politics of life itself. Theory, Culture & Society 18(6): 1-30.
  30. Ryan, S. and Runswick-Cole, K. (2008) Repositioning mothers: Mothers, disabled children and disability studies. Disability & Society 23(3): 199-210.
  31. Shildrick, M. (2009) Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  32. Shildrick, M. (2012) Critical disability studies: Rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In: N. Watson, A. Roulstone and C. Thomas (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. London: Routledge.
  33. Shildrick, M. and Price, J. (2005/2006) Deleuzian connections and queer corporealities: Shrinking global disability. Rhizomes 11/12, Fall 2005/Spring 2006.
  34. Siebers, T. (2006) Disability in theory: From social constructionism to the new realism of the body. In: K. Davis (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge, pp. 173-184.
  35. Slater, J. (2013) Constructions, Perceptions and Expectations of being 'Young' and 'Disabled': A critical disability perspective. Unpublished PhD thesis: Manchester Metro- politan University.

Related papers

Final author version of Goodley, D., Lawthom R. and Runswick-Cole, K. (in press). Posthuman disability studies. Subjectivity.

Dan Goodley

This paper explores the human through critical disability studies and the theories of Rosi Braidotti. We ask: what does it mean to be human in the 21st Century and in what ways does disability enhance these meanings? In addressing this question we seek to work through entangled connections of nature, society, technology, medicine, biopower and culture to consider the extent to which the human might be an outdated phenomenon, replaced by Braidotti’s posthuman condition. We then introduce disability as a political category, an identity and a moment of relational ethics. Critical disability studies, we argue, are perfectly at ease with the posthuman because disability has always contravened the traditional classical humanist conception of what it means to be human. Disability also invites a critical analysis of the posthuman. We examine the ways in which disability and posthuman work together, enhancing and complicating one another in ways that raise important questions about the kinds of life and death we value. We consider three of Braidotti’s themes in relation to disability: I. Life beyond the self: Rethinking enhancement; II. Life beyond the species: Rethinking animal; III. Life beyond death: Rethinking death. We conclude by advocating a posthuman disability studies that responds directly to contemporary complexities around the human whilst celebrating moments of difference and disruption

View PDFchevron_right
Exploring contemporary anthropological theory: Can we use posthumanism to reconceptualise the disabled body?
Hannah Gibson

Posthumanism is an umbrella term signalling theoretical approaches that endeavour to challenge pervasive human/non-human, normal/abnormal, organic/man-made binaries. To explore the value of posthumanism for disability studies, this piece interrogates Latour’s Actor Network Theory and Haraway’s Cyborg Theory. Both scholars provide innovative ways of reconceptualising how bodies are intimately connected and shaped by technology once we move beyond a purely human-centred mode of understanding the world. I seek to provoke the nuances of each paradigm by applying them to three distinct cases of people who are classified disabled by society and connect differently with technology. Haraway celebrates expansion of subjectivity and hybridity, yet her cyborg imagery better articulates those bodies which are augmented through personal choice rather than circumstance or dependency. On the other hand, a Latourian framework simultaneously rejects preconceptions of what disability is whilst allowing new insights to emerge without denying the possibility of existing inequalities or oppression. This ultimately offers more value to disability studies and anthropology of disability. Gibson, H. (2015) Exploring contemporary anthropological theory: Can we use posthumanism to reconceptualise the disabled body? Sites, 12(2): 1-21 DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/sites-vol12iss2id297

View PDFchevron_right
Humanity as a Contested Concept: Relations between Disability and ‘Being Human’
Jacqueline Kool

Social Inclusion, 2016

This editorial presents the theme and approach of the themed issue “Humanity as a Contested Concept: Relations between Disability and ‘Being Human’”. The way in which the concept of humanity is or must be related to disability is critically investigated from different disciplinary perspectives in the themed issue, which is, moreover, situated in the field of disability studies and related to discussions about posthumanism. The argument is made that humanity is a concept that needs to be constantly reflected upon from a disability studies perspective. Finally, the contributions of the themed issue are briefly outlined.

View PDFchevron_right
The Question of Disability in the Post-Human Debate. Critical Remarks
Chiara Gatti

Cuadernos de bioetica : revista oficial de la Asociacion Espanola de Bioetica y Etica Medica

The issue of disability represents a test case for the sustainability, practical and theoretical, of transhumanist theories that lead to the advent of a posthuman era. In fact, dealing with mankind implies also the possibility that man has a disability. So, seeing whether, in the posthuman debate, persons with disability are respected, will show us if every man is respected. In this paper we start by analyzing the definition of disability given by the posthuman theorists. As we will see, this definition is deficient because it is strictly linked with the transhumanists' refusal of the distinction between therapeutic treatment and enhancement. The field of enhancement is very wide, and the moral judgment on it cannot be generalized. Nowadays, many developments made possible by human enhancement theories remain only speculated upon. However, those theories are already influential in the field of studying the beginning of life. Indeed, the possibility ″to choose children″ is real: ...

View PDFchevron_right
The Bionic Body: Technology, Disability and Posthumanism
Magda Romanska

Body, Space & Technology , 2024

This paper looks at the new field of posthuman disability studies and its potential to provide a theoretical framework for critical theory's engagement with modern technologies. Historically, the human body, as represented and defined on stage and in art, has maintained a strictly defined visual integrity. Anything not shaped as 'human' was typically deemed monstrous (from hybrid mythological creatures to severely disabled 'elephant men'). Simultaneously, the category of 'human' was used to circumscribe the boundaries of belonging and the categories of valuation: some groups, including the disabled, were deemed 'sub-human' and designated to either be disposed of (as the carrier of 'life unworthy of life') or, if possible, to approximate the 'human' body. (Romanska 2019: 92-93). Until very recently, the goal of the prosthetics industry was to create limbs that would serve as visual stand-ins for missing limbs. Similarly, the technological capacities of prosthetic limbs were delineated by human capacities: the disabled were to be given as many 'abilities' as the non-disabled, but no more. However, this perception of what the disabled body can and should do has changed with technological progress: not only do the newest prosthetics often look as 'unhuman' as possible, but their capacities put into question the capacities and limits of the non-disabled body. All of these and other issues that have emerged in recent years at the crossroads of posthumanism, disability, and biomimicry have led to the development of posthuman disability studies, which tries to untangle and reconceptualize the ethical, legal, and philosophical boundaries of human enhancement, species belonging, sentiency, life and death, and human rights. The posthuman biomimicry and the prosthetic aspects of digital and AI technologies presuppose a form of disabling of the human body: a body without any connection to some type of machine is an inferior body. In this context, understanding the historical dynamics, critical, philosophical, and ethical debates that have dominated disability studies can provide a framework for how we reconceptualize our posthuman, hybrid future in which our existence with the machines that redefine previous hierarchies is inevitable. Thus, the paper proposes critical posthuman disability studies as a new analytical paradigm for recontextualization and exploration of the new modes of being in the Age of Tech.

View PDFchevron_right

Cited by

Assemblage Theory and Its Potentialities for Dis/ability Research in the Global South
Carlos Araneda-Urrutia

Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 2020

In this article, we present some potentialities of researching dis/ability in the global South from a new materialist and posthuman approach. We recognize that Southern disabled bodies are constituted in much more complex ways than those represented by globalized models of disability. Deleuze and Guattari’s assemblage theory can be a powerful tool to both demodel dis/ability and map the geopolitical and biosocial forces that produce it. With this theory, we map the production of dis/ability in neoliberal Chile, connecting the 2019 Chilean protests, the sex education policies for children and youth with disabilities, and the neocolonial intensities of neoliberal-ableism. Through this analysis, we show how discursive-material practices of ablement and disablement are legitimized as civilizing technologies by global discourses of inclusion and economic productivity. The return to ontological questions is presented as an opportunity for Disability Studies in the global South to move towards decolonization.

View PDFchevron_right
The DisHuman child
Katherine Runswick-Cole

Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 2015

In this paper, we consider the relationship between the human and disability; with specific focus on the lives of disabled children and young people. We begin with an analysis of the close relationship between 'the disabled' and 'the freak'. We demonstrate that the historical markings of disability as object of curiosity and register of fear serve to render disabled children as non-human and monstrous. We then consider how the human has been constituted, particularly in the periods of modernity and the rise of capitalism, reliant upon the naming of disability as antithetical to all that counts as human. In order to find a place for disabled children in a social and cultural context that has historically denied their humanity and cast them as monstrous others, we develop the theoretical notion of the DisHuman: a bifurcated complex that allows us recognise their humanity whilst also celebrating the ways in which disabled children reframe what it means to be human. We suggest that the lives of disabled children and young people demand us to think in ways that affirm the inherent humanness in their lives but also allow us to consider their disruptive potential: this is our DisHuman child. We draw on our research projects to explore three sites where the DisHuman child emerges in moments where sameness and difference, monstrosity/disability and humanity are invoked simultaneously. We explore three locations-(i) DisDevelopment; (ii) DisFamily and (iii) DisSexualityilluminating the ways in which the DisHuman child seeks nuanced, politicized and complicating forms of humanity.

View PDFchevron_right
Feeling disability: theories of affect and critical disability studies
Katherine Runswick-Cole

Disability & Society

This paper explores connections between affect studies and critical disability studies. Our interest in affect is sparked by the beginnings of a new research project that seeks to illuminate the lives, hopes and desires of young people with 'life-limiting' or 'life-threatening' impairments. Cultural responses to these young people are shaped by dominant discourses associated with lives lived well and long. Before commencing our empirical work with young people we use this paper to think through how we might conceptualise affect and disability. We present three themes; ontological invalidation in neoliberal-able times; affect aliens and crip killjoys; disability and resistant assemblages. Points of interest • This article is sparked by the beginnings of a research project working with young people with 'life-limiting' or 'life-threatening' impairments (LL/LTIs). • Too often, society treats people with LL/LTIs as tragedy cases requiring pity and sadness. • People often respond to disability in deeply emotional ways. • There has been a lot of research recently on emotions which is broadly termed affect theory but disability is often ignored. • We seek to connect affect theory and disability research with reference to young people with LL/LTIs in ways that can capture the desires, hopes and ambitions of these young people, their families and allies.

View PDFchevron_right
The Doing and Undoing of the “Autistic Child”: Cutting Together and Apart Interview-Based Empirical Materials
Rachel Holmes

Qualitative Inquiry

This article discusses how posthuman and new materialist theories afford us opportunities to rethink the production of the “autistic child,” drawing on a qualitative research project on parenthood in the context of childhood disability in Italy. We will put some Baradian’s key concepts (intra-action, agential cut and cutting together-apart) to work in glancing at the complexities we keep encountering when a mother, Arianna, describes her relationship with her daughter Laura. The aim of this article is twofold: first, to methodologically re-turn the production of the “autistic child,” and second, to rethink and unsettle the dichotomies that constitute some children as “disabled human beings,” abnormal, and undesirable.

View PDFchevron_right
Provocations for Critical Disability Studies
Katherine Runswick-Cole

Disability & Society, 2019

This article posits a number of provocations for scholars and researchers engaged with Critical Disability Studies. We summarise some of the analytical twists and turns occurring over the last few years that create a number of questions and concerns. We begin by introducing Critical Disability Studies; describing it as an interdisciplinary field of scholarship building on foundational disability studies theories. Critical Disability Studies scholarship is being produced at an exponential rate and we assert that we need to take pause for thought. We lay out five provocations to encourage reflection and debate: what is the purpose of Critical Disability Studies; how inclusive is Critical Disability Studies; is disability the object or subject of studies; what matters or gets said about disability; and how can we attend to disability and ability? We conclude by making a case for a reflexive and politicised Critical Disability Studies.

View PDFchevron_right
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
© 2025 Academia. All rights reserved