Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

We Have Always Been Modern

Abstract

My main purpose in this paper is to summarize and respond to Bruno Latour's We Have Never Been Modern. 1 Latour makes both descriptive and normative claims in the work. Latour's key descriptive claim has two parts. The first is that the construction of " modernism " is an instance of a human sense-making process that is perpetually present and has never changed, and therefore modernism's essential property, i.e. its claim to be a radical break with the past, is false. The second part is that this break is achieved by the privileging of a process of purification (i.e. the maintenance of the separation of Nature and Culture) at the expense of acknowledging the complementary process of mediation/translation, and as a result modernism cannot " see " itself clearly enough to tell that it is not a radical break with the past. Thus, we never have been (and never could be) " modern. " His normative assertion as a consequence is that by making transparent the denied construction of modernity (and its ongoing-ness) we will gain modernity's benefits without suffering its losses. Latour undertakes an investigation of the relationship between the epistemology and ontology of modernism. What Latour offers as an alternative is akin to a meta-ontology that hopes to makes sense of this process. Unmediated access to the world is impossible because it is, in essence, not " out there " to be accessed. Thus, there is a kind of ontological necessity that exists as a function of the reality of epistemological 1 Latour, Bruno (1993), We have never been modern, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

References (7)

  1. Latour, Bruno (1993), We have never been modern, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  2. Serres, Michel (1987), Statues, Paris: Francois Bourin.
  3. Geertz, Clifford (1973), The interpretation of cultures; selected essays, New York,: Basic Books.
  4. Callon, Michel (1992), "Techno-economic networks and irreversibility," in A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination, ed. John Law, vol. 38, pp. 132- 64. 38. Routledge Sociologial Review Monograph.
  5. Newman, M. E. J. (2003), "The Structure and Function of Complex Networks," SIAM Review 45, pp. 167-256.
  6. Scott, John (2000), Social Network Analysis : A Handbook, 2nd ed. London ; Thousands Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.
  7. Eliot, T.S. (1943), "Little Gidding V," in Four Quartets.