Aggregation Issues in Cognitive Mapping
https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00076Abstract
Cognitive mapping involves the description of the way individuals store and process geographic information. Typically, cognitive mapping data are derived from individual responses and then analyzed in one of three ways: (1) the individual data sets are analyzed separately and only pooled for comparison (disaggregation); (2) the individual data sets are averaged and then analyzed (collective aggregation); or (3) the individual data sets are analyzed and the results averaged (individual aggregation). This paper compares the latter two aggregation strategies for analyzing cognitive mapping data using data collected in a large-scale study of students' configurational knowledge of the city of Swansea in the United Kingdom. It is contended that the aggregation strategy adopted will have a fundamental effect upon the conclusions drawn from a study.
References (32)
- Alker, H. S. 1969. A typology of ecological fallacy. In Quantitative Ecological Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. M. Dogan and S. Rokan, 69-86. London: MIT Press.
- Brofenbrenner, U. 1979. The Ecology of Human De- velopment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bryant, K. J. 1984. Methodological convergence as an issue within environmental cognition research. Journal of Environmental Psychology 4: 43-60.
- Cadwallader, M. T. 1976. Cognitive distance in in- traurban space. In Environmental Knowing, ed. G. T. Moore and R. G. Golledge, 316-24. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
- Curtis, A., and A. S. Fotheringham. 1995. Large scale information surfaces: An analysis of city name re- calls in the United States. Geoforum 26: 65-78.
- Downs, R. M., and D. Stea. 1973a. Theory. In Image and Environment, ed. R. M. Downs and D. Stea, 8-26. Chicago: Aldine.
- ---. 1973b. Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and products. In Image and Environment, ed. R. M. Downs and D. Stea, 8-26. Chicago: Aldine.
- Evans, G. W., D. G. Marrero, and P. A. Butler. 1981. Environmental learning and cognitive mapping. Environment and Behavior 13: 83-104.
- Ewing, G. O. 1981. On the sensitivity of conclusions about the bases of cognitive distance. Professional Geographer 35: 311-14.
- Fotheringham, A. S., and D. W. S. Wong. 1991. The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate sta- tistical analysis. Environment and Planning A 23: 1,025-44.
- Fotheringham, A. S., P. A. Densham, and A. Curtis. 1995. The zone definition problem in location- allocation modeling. Geographical Analysis 27: 61-77.
- Gehlke, C. E., and K. K. Biehl. 1934. Certain effects of grouping upon the size of the correlation coeffi- cient in census tract material. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Supplement 29: 169-70.
- Golledge, R. G., and R. J. Stimson. 1987. Analytical Behavioral Geography. London: Croom Helm.
- Golledge, R. G., T. R. Smith, J. W. Pellegrino, S. Doherty, and S. P. Marshall. 1985. A conceptual model and empirical analysis of children's acquisi- tion of spatial knowledge. Journal of Environmental Psychology 5: 125-52.
- Gould, P. 1975. Acquiring spatial information. Eco- nomic Geography 51: 87-99.
- ---. 1976. Cultivating the garden: A commentary and critique on some multidimensional specula- tions. In Spatial Choice and Spatial Behavior, ed. R. G. Golledge and G. Rushton, 83-91. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
- Harman, E. J., and J. F. Betak. 1976. Behavioral geog- raphy, multidimensional scaling and the mind. In Spatial Choice and Spatial Behavior, ed. R. G. Golledge and G. Rushton, 3-22. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
- Johnston, R. J., D. Gregory, and D. M. Smith, eds. 1991. Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Kitchin, R. M. 1994a. Cognitive maps: What are they and why study them? Journal of Environmental Psy- chology 14: 1-19.
- ---. 1994b. CMAP (Cognitive Mapping Analysis Package). Public Domain Software, University of Wales Swansea.
- Kitchin, R. M., and R. D. Jacobson. Forthcoming. Techniques to collect and analyze the cognitive map knowledge of people with visual impairments or blindness: Issues of validity. Journal of Visual Impair- ment and Blindness.
- Lloyd, R. 1989. Cognitive maps: Encoding and decod- ing information. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 79(1): 101-24.
- Lloyd, R., and C. Heivly. 1987. Systematic distortions in urban cognitive maps. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77: 191-207.
- MacKay, D. B. and R. W. Olshavsky. 1975. Cognitive maps of retail locations: An investigation of some basic issues. Journal of Consumer Research 2: 197-205.
- Magana, J. R., G. W. Evans, and A. K. Romney. 1981. Scaling techniques in the analysis of envi- ronmental cognition data. Professional Geographer 33: 294-301.
- McNamara, T. P., J. K. Hardy, and S. C. Hirtle. 1989. Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cog- nition 15: 271-87.
- Neprash, J. A. 1934. Some problems in the correlation of spatially distributed variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Supplement 29: 167-68.
- Newcombe, N. 1985. Methods for the study of spatial cognition. In The Development of Spatial Cognition, ed. R. Cohen, 1-12. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Openshaw, S. 1983. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. CATMOG Series #38. London: Institute of British Geographers.
- Tobler, W. R. 1965. Computation of the corre- spondence of geographic patterns. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association 15: 131-39.
- Turk, A. G. 1990. Towards an understanding of hu- man-computer interaction aspects of geographic information systems. Cartography 19: 31-60.
- Waterman, S., and D. Gordon. 1984. A quantitative- comparative approach to analysis of distortion in mental maps. Professional Geographer 36: 326-37.