Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Censuses, Population: Comparative International Aspects

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.41004-4

Abstract

In most countries around the world, the population census is a crucial tool of governance, providing vital information about a country's size, spatial distribution, and socio-demographic characteristics. This article identifies some of the defining characteristics of the population census and explores variations in census practices in an international context. The expansion in the conceptualization of the census, combined with the introduction of technological innovations in data capture, coding, and dissemination, has both complicated and enriched the possibilities for comparative census analysis in the regional and global contexts.

References (31)

  1. Anderson, M.J., Fienberg, S.E., 2001. Who Counts?: The Politics of Census-Taking in Contemporary America. Russell Sage Foundation Publications, New York.
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012. Fact Sheet: eCensus Take-up Rates. http:// www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/censushome.nsf/home/factsheetsecensus? opendocument&navpos¼450 (accessed 13.04.13.).
  3. Bailar, Barbara A., 2001. Censuses: comparative international aspects. In: Smelser, N.J., Baltes, P.B. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1595-1599.
  4. Bell, M., Muhidin, S., 2009. Cross-National Comparisons of Internal Migration. Human Development Research Paper 2009/30. United Nations Development Programme, New York.
  5. Bentley, M., Mattingly, T., Hough, C., Bennett, C., 2003. Census Quality Survey to Evaluate Responses to the Census 2000 Question on Race: An Introduction to the Data. Census 2000 Evaluation.
  6. Bryan, T., Heuser, R., 2004. Collection and processing of demographic data. In: Siegel, J., Swanson, D. (Eds.), The Methods and Materials of Demography, second ed. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 43-63.
  7. Coleman, D., 2013. The twilight of the census. Population and Development Review 38, 334-351.
  8. Dugmore, K., Furness, P., Leventhal, B., Moy, C., 2011. Beyond the 2011 census in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Market Research 53 (5), 619-650.
  9. Eurostat, 2011. Methodologies and Working Papers. EU Legislation on the 2011 Population and Housing Censuses: Explanatory Notes.
  10. Ewbank, Douglas C., 1981. Age Misreporting and Age-Selective Underenumeration: Sources, Patterns, and Consequences for Demographic Analysis. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  11. Jones, N.A., Smith, A.S., Black, A.A., Hawaiian, N., Indian, A., 2001. The Two or More Races Population, 2000, vol. 8(2). US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
  12. Lenk, M., 2008. Methods of Register-based Census in Austria. Statistik Austria, Wien.
  13. Mather, M., Pollard, K.M., Jacobsen, L., 2011. First Results from the 2010 Census. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC.
  14. Morning, A., 2008. Ethnic classification in global perspective: a cross-national survey of the 2000 census round. Population Research and Policy Review 27 (2), 239-272.
  15. Prewitt, Kenneth, 2003. Politics and Science in Census Taking. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
  16. Shryock, H., Siegel, J., Larmon, E., 1971. The Methods and Materials of Demography. US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Washington, DC.
  17. Simon, P., 2007. "Ethnic" Statistics and Data Protection in the Council of Europe Countries. European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, Strasbourg.
  18. Skerry, P., 2000. Counting the Census?: Race, Group Identity, and the Evasion of Politics. No. 56. Brookings Institution Press.
  19. Statistics New Zealand, 2012. Transforming the New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings: Issues, Options and Strategies. Statistics New Zealand, Wellington, NZ.
  20. Stukel, D., 2008. Projected Census Dates, Funding Requirements and Sources, and Technical Assistance Needs for the 2010 Round of Population and Housing Censuses. United Nations Statistics Division, New York.
  21. United Nations, 1998. Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, New York.
  22. United Nations, 2008. Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses, Revision 2. Series M No. 67/Rev.2. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, New York.
  23. United Nations, 2009a. Census Data Capture Methodology Technical Report. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, New York.
  24. United Nations, 2009b. Handbook on Population and Housing Census Editing, Revision 1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division, New York.
  25. United Nations, 2009c. Post Enumeration Surveys Operational Guidelines Technical Report. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division, New York.
  26. United Nations, 2010. Report on the Results of a Survey on Census Methods Used by Countries in the 2010 Census Round. United Nations Statistics Division, New York.
  27. United Nations, 2012. Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Eightieth Session, 13 February-9 March 2012. General Assembly Official Records Sixty-seventh Session Supplement No. 18 (A/67/18).
  28. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, 2006. Conference of European statisticians recommendations for the 2010 censuses of population and housing. United Nations, New York and Geneva.
  29. UNECE Secretariat, 2010. Main results of the UNECE-UNSD survey on the 2010-2011 round of censuses in the UNECE region. United Nations Economic and Social Council, Geneva.
  30. U.S. Census, 2010. The Development and Sensitivity Analysis of the 2010 Demographic Analysis Estimates by the Demographic Analysis Research Team. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
  31. Valente, P., 2010. Census taking in Europe: how are populations counted in 2010? Population & Societies 467, 1-4.