Automated Syntactic Medation for Web Service Integration
2006
Abstract
As the Web Services and Grid community adopt Semantic Web technology, we observe a shift towards higherlevel workflow composition and service discovery practices. While this provides excellent functionality to non-expert users, more sophisticated middleware is required to hide the details of service invocation and service integration. An investigation of a common Bioinformatics use case reveals that the execution of high-level workflow designs requires additional processing to harmonise syntactically incompatible service interfaces. In this paper, we present an architecture to support the automatic reconciliation of data formats in such Web Service worklflows. The mediation of data is driven by ontologies that encapsulate the information contained in heterogeneous data structures supplying a common, conceptual data representation. Data conversion is carried out by a Configurable Mediator component, consuming mappings between XML schemas and OWL ontologies. We describe our system and give examples of our mapping language against the background of a Bioinformatics use case.
References (13)
- R. Akkiraju, J. Farrell, J.Miller, M. Nagarajan, M. Schmidt, and A. S. K. Verma. Web service semantics -WSDL-S. Technical report, UGA-IBM, 2005.
- T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American, pages 34 -43, 2001.
- S. Bowers and B. Ludascher. An ontology-driven frame- work for data transformation in scientific workflows. In Intl. Workshop on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (DILS'04), 2004.
- C. Goble, S. Pettifer, R. Stevens, and C. Greenhalgh. Knowl- edge Integration: In silico Experiments in Bioinformatics. In I. Foster and C. Kesselman, editors, The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure Second Edition. Mor- gan Kaufmann, November 2003.
- D. Hull, R. Stevens, and P. Lord. Describing web services for user-oriented retrieval. 2005.
- F. Leymann. Web services flow language (WSFL 1.0), May 2001.
- P. Lord, P. Alper, C. Wroe, and C. Goble. Feta: A light- weight architecture for user oriented semantic service dis- covery. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications: Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, pages 17 -31, Jan. 2005.
- D. Martin, M. Burstein, G. Denker, J. Hobbs, L. Kagal, O. Lassila, D. McDermott, S. McIlraith, M. Paolucci, B. Par- sia, T. Payne, M. Sabou, E. Sirin, M. Solanki, N. Srinivasan, and K. Sycara. OWL-S: Semantic markup for web service. Technical report, The OWL Services Coalition, 2003.
- L. Moreau, Y. Zhao, I. Foster, J. Voeckler, and M. Wilde. XDTM: the XML Dataset Typing and Mapping for Speci- fying Datasets. In Proceedings of the 2005 European Grid Conference (EGC'05), Amsterdam, Nederlands, Feb. 2005.
- P. F. Patel-Schneider, P. Hayes, and I. Horrocks. OWL web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. Technical report, W3C, 2004.
- D. Roman, H. Lausen, and U. Keller. D2v1.0. web ser- vice modeling ontology (WSMO), September 2004. WSMO Working Draft.
- J. F. Sowa and J. A. Zachman. Extending and formalizing the framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst. J., 31(3):590-616, 1992.
- R. Stevens, C. Goble, N. W. Paton, S. Bechhofer, G. Ng, P. Baker, and A. Brass. Complex Query Formulation Over Diverse Information Sources in TAMBIS. In Z. Lacroix and T. Critchlow, editors, Managing Scientific Data. Morgan Kaufmann, May 2003.