Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Integrated Systems for Inducing Spatio-Temporal Process Models.

Abstract

Quantitative modeling plays a key role in the natural sciences, and systems that address the task of inductive process modeling can assist researchers in explaining their data. In the past, such systems have been limited to data sets that recorded change over time, but many interesting problems involve both spatial and temporal dynamics. To meet this challenge, we introduce SCISM, an integrated intelligent system which solves the task of inducing process models that account for spatial and temporal variation. We also integrate SCISM with a constraint learning method to reduce computation during induction. Applications to ecological modeling demonstrate that each system fares well on the task, but that the enhanced system does so much faster than the baseline version.

References (15)

  1. Arrigo, K. R.; van Dijken, G. L.; and Bushinsky, S. 2008. Primary production in the southern ocean, 1997-2006. Jour- nal of Geophysical Research 113:C08004.
  2. Asgharbeygi, N.; Langley, P.; Bay, S.; and Arrigo, K. 2006. Inductive revision of quantitative process models. Ecologi- cal Modelling 194:70-79.
  3. Bradley, E.; Easley, M.; and Stolle, R. 2001. Reasoning about nonlinear system identification. Artificial Intelligence 133:139 -188.
  4. Bridewell, W., and Langley, P. 2010. Two kinds of knowl- edge in scientific discovery. Topics in Cognitive Science 2:36-52.
  5. Bridewell, W., and Todorovski, L. 2007. Learning declara- tive bias. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Interna- tional Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, 63-77.
  6. Bridewell, W.; Langley, P.; Todorovski, L.; and Džeroski, S. 2008. Inductive process modeling. Machine Learning 71:1-32.
  7. Bunch, D. S.; Gay, D. M.; and Welsch, R. E. 1993. Algorithm 717: Subroutines for maximum likelihood and quasi-likelihood estimation of parameters in nonlinear re- gression models. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Soft- ware 19:109-130.
  8. Heath, M. T. 2001. Scientific Computing. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  9. Langley, P.; Sánchez, J.; Todorovski, L.; and Džeroski, S. 2002. Inducing process models from continuous data. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 347-354. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  10. Langley, P.; Shiran, O.; Shrager, J.; Todorovski, L.; and Po- horille, A. 2006. Constructing explanatory process models from biological data and knowledge. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 37:191-201.
  11. Srinivasan, A. 2004. The Aleph Manual. Technical Report, Computing Laboratory, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  12. Todorovski, L., and Džeroski, S. 1997. Declarative bias in equation discovery. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning, 376-384. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
  13. Todorovski, L.; Bridewell, W.; Shiran, O.; and Langley, P. 2005. Inducing hierarchical process models in dynamic do- mains. In Proceedings of the Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 892-897. Pittsburgh: AAAI Press.
  14. Todorovski, L. 2003. Using domain knowledge for auto- mated modeling of dynamic systems with equation discov- ery. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  15. Zador, A., and Koch, C. 1994. Linearized models of cal- cium dynamics: Formal equivalence to the cable equation. Journal of Neuroscience 14:4705-4715.