Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Toward semantic interoperability of electronic health records

2012

https://doi.org/10.1109/TITB.2011.2180917

Abstract

Although the goal of achieving semantic interoperability of electronic health records (EHRs) is pursued by many researchers, it has not been accomplished yet. In this paper, we present a proposal that smoothes out the way toward the achievement of that goal. In particular, our study focuses on medical diagnoses statements. In summary, the main contributions of our ontology-based proposal are the following: first, it includes a canonical ontology whose EHR-related terms focus on semantic aspects. As a result, their descriptions are independent of languages and technology aspects used in different organizations to represent EHRs. Moreover, those terms are related to their corresponding codes in well-known medical terminologies. Second, it deals with modules that allow obtaining rich ontological representations of EHR information managed by proprietary models of health information systems. The features of one specific module are shown as reference. Third, it considers the necessary mapping axioms between ontological terms enhanced with so-called path mappings. This feature smoothes out structural differences between heterogeneous EHR representations, allowing proper alignment of information.

References (28)

  1. V. N. Stroetman, Ed., D. Kalra, P. Lewalle, A. Rector, J. M. Rodrigues, K. A. Stroetmann, G. Surjan, B. Ustun, M. Virtanen, and P. E. Zanstra, "Semantic interoperability for better health and safer healthcare," Eur. 6 http://www.levenshtein.net/ 7 wordnet.princeton.edu/ 8 http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/
  2. Electronic Health Record Communication Part 1: Reference Model, ISO 13606-1, 2008.
  3. HL7-CDA. (2011). [Online]. Available: http://www.hl7.org
  4. P. Schloeffel, T. Beale, G. Hayworth, S. Heard, and H. Leslie, "The re- lationship between CEN 13606, HL7 and openEHR," presented at the Health Informat. Conf., Sydney, Australia, 2006.
  5. V. Kashyap and A. P. Sheth, "Semantic and schematic similarities between database objects: A context based approach," Very Large Databases J., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 276-304, 1996.
  6. Web Ontology Language. World Wide Web Consortium. (2009). [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/
  7. M. Uschold and M. Gruninger, "Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications," Knowl. Eng. Rev., vol. 11, pp. 93-136, 1996.
  8. T. Beale and S. Heard, "An ontology-based model of clinical information," in Proc. 12th World Congr. Health (Med.) Informat.-Build. Sustainable Health,, Brisbane, Australia, 2007, pp. 760-764.
  9. C. Wroe, "Is semantic web technology ready for healthcare?," Paper pre- sented at the 3rd Eur. Semant. Web Conf., Budva, Montenegro, Jun. 2006
  10. J. H. Weber-Jahnke and J. Williams, "The smart internet as a catalyst for health care reform," in Smart Internet-Current Research and Future Applications, 2010, pp. 27-48.
  11. R. Krummenacher, E. P. B. Simperl, D. Cerizza, E. D. Valle, L. J. B. Nixon, and D. Foxvog, "Enabling the European patient summary through triplespaces," Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 95, no. 2-S1, pp. 33-43, 2009.
  12. O. Kilic and A. Dogac, "Achieving clinical statement interoperability using R-MIM and archetype-based semantic transformations," IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 467-477, 2009.
  13. V. Bicer, O. Kilic, A. Dogac, and G. B. Laleci, "Archetype-based semantic interoperability of web service messages in the health care domain," Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1-22, 2005.
  14. C. Martínez-Costa, M. M. Tortosa, and J. T. Fernández-Breis, "An ap- proach for the semantic interoperability of ISO EN 13606 and openEHR archetypes," J. Biomed. Informat., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 736-746, 2010.
  15. L. Lezcano, M.-Á. Sicilia, and C. Rodríguez-Solano, "Integrating reason- ing and clinical archetypes using OWL ontologies and SWRL rules," J. Biomed. Informat., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 343-353, 2011.
  16. The openEHR Foundation. Archetype Definition Language. (2007). [Online]. Available: http://www.openehr.org/releases/1.0.2/architecture/ am/adl.pdf
  17. B. Prados-Suarez, C. Molina, M. Prados, and C. Peña, "On the use of an ontology to improve the interoperability and accesibility of the electron- ical health records (ehr)," in Proc. Int. Workshop Semant. Interoperabil., Rome, Italy, Jan. 2011, pp. 73-81.
  18. R. Hedayat, "Semantic web technologies in the quest for compatible dis- tributed health records," Department of Information Technology, Uppsala Univ. Uppsala, Sweden, White Paper, Mar. 2010.
  19. L. González, G. Llambías, and P. Pazos, "Towards an e-health integration platform to support social security services," presented at the 6th Int. Policy Res. Conf. Soc. Security, Luxembourg, Sep. 2010.
  20. SNOMED. (2011). [Online]. Available:http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/
  21. LOINC. (2011). [Online]. Available: http://loinc.org/
  22. P.-A. Champin, G.-J. Houben, and P. Thiran, "Cross: An OWL wrapper for reasoning on relational databases," in Conceptual Modeling-ER 2007 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series), vol. 4801, C. Parent, K.- D. Schewe, V. C. Storey, and B. Thalheim, Eds. New York: Springer- Verlag, 2007, pp. 502-517.
  23. J. M. Blanco, A. Illarramendi, and A. Goñi, "Building a federated rela- tional database system: An approach using a knowledge-based system," Int. J. Cooperat. Inf. Syst., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 415-456, 1994.
  24. J. M. Blanco, A. Goñi, and A. Illarramendi, "Mapping among knowledge bases and data repositories: Precise definition of its syntax and semantics," Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 275-301, 1999.
  25. J. Euzenat and P. Shvaiko, Ontology Matching. New York: Springer- Verlag, 2007.
  26. SWRL. (2011). [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/Submission/ SWRL/
  27. S. Muggleton, "Inductive logic programming," New Generat. Comput., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 295-318, 1991.
  28. Authors' photographs and biographies not available at the time of publication.