Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Future directions for intergroup contact theory and research

2008, International Journal of Intercultural Relations

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINTREL.2007.12.002

Abstract

Intergroup contact theory and research has received renewed interest in recent years. And this new work has led to rapid advances. This paper summarizes this progress and points to four future directions for further advances. (1) There is a continuing need to specify the processes of intergroup contact that explain its many effects. This is a call for continued efforts to determine the many mediators and moderators that are involved.

References (82)

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  2. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(7), 751-758.
  4. Batson, C. D., Lishner, Cook, J., & Sawyer, S. (2005). Similarity and nurturance: Two possible sources of empathy for strangers. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), 15-25.
  5. Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., & Imhoff, H. J. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105-118.
  6. Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
  7. Blalock, H. (1972). Social statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  8. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Lickel, B. (2000). Stigma, threat and social interactions. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 307-333). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  9. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 253-267.
  10. Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 263-289.
  11. Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255-343.
  12. Butler, J. S., & Wilson, K. L. (1978). The American Soldier revisited: Race relations and the military. Social Science Quarterly, 59(3), 451-467.
  13. Chavous, T. M. (2005). An intergroup contact-theory framework for evaluating racial climate in predominantly college campuses. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(3, 4), 239-257.
  14. Christ, O., Mansel, J., Wagner, U., Asbrock, F., Schleuter, E., & Pettigrew, T. F. (under review-a). Emotions as determinants of prejudice and discrimination.
  15. Christ, O., Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Wagner, U., Hughes, J., & Cairns, E (under review-b). The precarious benefits of indirect intergroup contact: Direct contact is necessary for enduring prejudice reduction.
  16. Dixon, J. A., Durrheim, K., & Tredoux, C. (2005). Beyond the optimal strategy: A ''reality check'' for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697-711.
  17. Eller, A. L., & Abrams, D. (2003). 'Gringos' in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 55-75.
  18. Eller, A. L., & Abrams, D. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew's reformulated intergroup contact model and the Common Ingroup Model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts European. Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229-256.
  19. Gudykunst, W. B. (1985). A model of uncertainty reduction in intercultural encounters. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 79-97.
  20. Gurin, P., Dey, E. I., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330-366.
  21. Gurin, P., Lehman, J. S., & Lewis, E. (2004). Defneding diversity: Affirmative action at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  22. Hamberger, J., & Hewstone, M. (1997). Inter-ethnic contact as a predictor of blatant and subtle prejudice: Test of a model in four West European countries. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 173-190.
  23. Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from physiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889-898.
  24. Heitmeyer, W. (Ed.). (2004). Deutsche Zustande. Folge 3 [The German situation, Part 3.] Frankfurt am Main. Germany: Suhrkamp Verlag.
  25. Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). Some of my best friends: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412-424.
  26. Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact: Panacea for prejudice? Psychologist, 16, 352-355.
  27. Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., Hamberger, J., & Niens, U. (2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of ''The Troubles'' in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62(1), 99-120.
  28. Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., Paolini, S., McLernon, F., Crisp, R. J., et al. (2004). Intergroup contact in a divided society: Challenging segregation in Northern Ireland. In D. Abrams, J. M. Marques, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 265- 292). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  29. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
  30. Irish, D. P. (1952). Reactions of Caucasian residents to Japanese-American neighbors. Journal of Social Issues, 8, 10-17.
  31. Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710.
  32. Kelman, H. (in press). Bridging individual and social change in international conflict: Contextual social psychology in action. In U. Wagner, L. Tropp, G Finchilescu, & C. Tredoux (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  33. Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1255- 1266.
  34. Lee, B. A., Farrell, C. R., & Link, B. G. (2004). Revisiting the contact hypothesis: The case of public exposure to homelessness. American Sociological Review, 69, 40-63.
  35. Levin, S., van Laar, C., & Sidanius, J. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 76-92.
  36. McClenahan, C., Cairns, E., Dunn, S., & Morgan, V. (1996). Intergroup friendships: Integrated and desegregated schools in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 549-558.
  37. McFarland, S. (1999). Is authoritarianism sufficient to explain individual differences in prejudice? Unpublished paper delivered at the Oxford, England meeting of the European Association for Experimental Social Psychology.
  38. McGarry, J., & O'Leary, B. (1995). Explaining Northern Ireland: Broken images. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  39. Mendes, W. B., Blascovich, J., Lickel, B., & Hunter, S. (2002). Challenge and threat during social interaction with and black men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 939-952.
  40. Miller, D. A., Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2004). Effects of intergroup contact and Political predispositions on prejudice: The role of intergroup emotions. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 221-237.
  41. Niens, U., Cairns, E., & Hewstone, M. (2002). Contact and conflict in Ireland. In O. Hargie & D. Dickson (Eds.), Research the troubles: social science perspectives on the Northern Ireland conflict (pp. 123-140). Edinburgh, Scotland: Mainstream Publishing.
  42. Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. R. (under review). From intergroup contact to intergroup closeness: Stress-reducing effects of cross-ethnic friendship. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
  43. Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, & Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770-786.
  44. Pettigrew, T. F. (1967). The consequences of racial isolation in the public schools: Another look. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, National conference on equal educational opportunity in America's Cities (pp. 692-722). Washington, DC, US: Government Printing Office.
  45. Pettigrew, T. F. (1969). Racially separate or together? Journal of Social Issues, 25(1), 43-69.
  46. Pettigrew, T. F. (1991). The importance of cumulative effects: A neglected emphasis of Sherif's work. In D. Granberg & G. Sarup (Eds.), Social judgment and intergroup relations: Essays in honor of Muzafer Sherif (pp. 89-103). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  47. Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-185.
  48. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
  49. Pettigrew, T. F. (2006). Commentary: The advantages of multi-level approaches. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 615-620.
  50. Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation International. Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(4), 41-425.
  51. Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J., Christ, O., & Wagner, U. (under review-a). Why does authoritarianism predict prejudice? The mediators of a global phenomenon.
  52. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751- 783.
  53. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (in press). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology.
  54. Pettigrew, T. F., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (under review-b). The contrasting contexts of positive and negative intergroup contact.
  55. Phinney, J. S., Ferguson, D. L., & Tate, J. D. (1997). Intergroup attitudes among ethnic minority adolescents: A causal model. Child Development, 68, 955-969.
  56. Powers, D. A., & Ellison, C. G. (1995). Interracial contact and Black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces, 74, 205-226.
  57. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2006). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved August 21, 2006 at http://www.psych.ku/preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
  58. Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2007). Negotiating interracial interactions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 316-320.
  59. Shelton, J. N., & Richeson, J. A. (2006). Ethnic minorities' racial attitudes and contact experiences with people. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12(1), 149-164.
  60. Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., & Salvatore, J. (2005). Expecting to be the target of prejudice: Implications for interethnic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(9), 1189-1202.
  61. Shelton, J. N., Richeson, J. A., Salvatore, J., & Trawalter, S. (2005). Ironic effects of racial bias during interracial interactions. Psychological Science, 16(5), 397-402.
  62. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  63. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  64. Sidanius, J., van Laar, C., Levin, S., & Sinclair, S. (2004). Ethnic enclaves and the dynamics of social identity on the college campus: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(1), 96-110.
  65. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  66. Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Ervin, K. S., Jackson, L. A., et al. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and s. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242-1254.
  67. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157-175.
  68. Stephan, W. G., Stephan, C. W., & Gudykunst, W. B. (1999). Anxiety in intergroup relations: A comparison of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 613-628.
  69. Tropp, L. R. (2003). The psychological impact of prejudice: Implications for intergroup contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 131- 149.
  70. Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005a). Differential relationships between intergroup contact and affective and cognitive dimensions of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1145-1158.
  71. Tropp, L. R., & Pettigrew, T. F. (2005b). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 651-653.
  72. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Pettigrew, T. F., Christ, O., Wolf, C., Petzel, T., et al. (2004). The role of perceived importance in intergroup contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 211-227.
  73. Van Laar, C., Levin. S., & Sidanius, J. (in press). Ingroup and outgroup contact: A longitudinal study of the effects of cross-ethnic friendships. Roommate relationships and participation in segregated organizations. In U. Wagner, L. Tropp, G. Finchilescu, & C. Tredoux (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  74. Van Laar, C., Levin, S., Sinclair, S., & Sidanius, J. (2005). The effect of university roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(4), 329-345.
  75. Vescio, T. K., Sechrist, G. B., & Paolucci, M. P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455-472.
  76. Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 37-54.
  77. Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T. F., Stellmacher, J., & Wolf, C. (2007). Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(4), 380-390.
  78. Wagner, U., van Dick, R., Pettigrew, T. F., & Christ, O. (2003). Ethnic prejudice in East and West Germany: The explanatory power of intergroup contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 22-36.
  79. Williams, R. M., Jr (1947). The reduction of intergroup tensions. New York: Social Science Research Council.
  80. Wilson, T. C. (1996). Prejudice reduction or self-selection? A test of the contact hypothesis. Sociological Spectrum, 16, 43-60.
  81. Wright, S. C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73-90.
  82. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(Monograph Supplement, No. 2, part 2), 1-27.