Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Picking reference events from tense trees

1990, Proceedings of the workshop on Speech and Natural Language - HLT '90

https://doi.org/10.3115/116580.116597

Abstract

Despite numerous investigations into English tense-aspect semantics, the problem of formally interpreting tense and aspect remains in large part unsolved. A formal solution requires (a) a well-defined mapping from a subset of English covering the most common tense-aspect constructions (including embedded tensed clauses) to a formal meaning representation, and (b) a well-defined denotational semantics for the meaning representation, which accords with speakers' intuitions about the original text. We propose a simple structure called a tense tree (or a set of connected tense trees) as a basis for interpreting tense-aspect constructions and some time adverbials in a context-dependent way. The de-indexicalization process simultaneously transforms tense trees and logical forms, the former in accord with simple recursion equations and the latter in accord with formal equivalences between context-indexed and context-independent logical forms. The rules have been implemented, and yield meaning representations in a formal episodic logic for narrative understanding.

References (19)

  1. Allen, J. Natural
  2. Barwise, J. The Situation in Logic. CSLI: Stanford, CA, 1989.
  3. Davidson, D. "The logical form of action sentences." In D. Davidson and G. Harman, eds., The Logic of Gram- mar, 235-245, Dickenson, Encino, CA, 1975.
  4. Dowty, D. "Tense, time adverbs and compositional se- mantic theory." Ling. and Phil., 5:23-55, 1982.
  5. Harman, G. "Logical form." In D. Davidson and G. Har- man, eds., The Logic of Grammar, 289-307, Dickenson, Encino, CA, 1975.
  6. Hinrichs, E. W.. "Tense, quantifiers, and contexts." Comput. Ling., 14(2):3-14, 1988.
  7. Hobbs, J. R., "Coherence and coreference', Cog. Sci., 3(1):67-82, 1979.
  8. Leech, G. Meaning and the English Verb (2nd edition), Longman, London, 1987.
  9. McCawley, J.D., "Notes on the English present perfect", Australian J. of Ling., 1:81-90, 1981.
  10. Moens, M. and Steedman, M. "Temporal ontology and temporal reference." Comput. Ling., 14(2):15-28, 1988.
  11. Passonneau, R.J., "A computational model of the se- mantics of tense and aspect." Comput. Ling. 14(2):44- 60, 1988.
  12. Partee, B., "Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English." J. of Phil., 70: 601-609, 1973.
  13. Reichenbach, H. Elements of Symbolic Logic. Macmillan, New York, NY, 1947.
  14. Richards, B., "Tenses, temporal quantifiers and seman- tic innocence", in E. LePore (ed.), New Directions in Semantics, 337-384, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1987.
  15. Schubert, L. K. and Hwang, C. H. "An episodic knowl- edge representation for narrative texts." In 1st Inter. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR89), 444-458, Toronto, Canada, May 15- 18, 1989.
  16. Schubert, L. K. and Hwang, C. H. "An episodic knowl- edge representation for narrative texts." TR 345, U. of Rochester, Rochester, NY, May 1990.
  17. Schubert, L. K. and Pelletier, F. J. "From English to logic: context free computation of 'conventional' logi- cal translations." American J. of Comp. Ling., 8:26-44, 1982. Also in Readings in Natural Language Processing, B. Grosz, K. Jones and B. Webber, eds., 293-311, Mor- gan Kaufman, Los Altos, CA, 1986.
  18. Schubert, L. K. and Pelletier, F. J. "Generically speak- ing, or, using discourse representation theory to in- terpret generics." In G. Chierchia, B. Partee, and R. Turner, editors, Property Theory, Type Theory, and Semantics, V.2: Semantic Issues, 193-268. Kluwer Aca- demic Publ., Boston, MA, 1989.
  19. Webber, B. L. "Tense as discourse anaphor." Comput. Ling., 14(2):61-73, 1988.