Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Characterization of data retention faults in DRAM devices

2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT)

https://doi.org/10.1109/DFT.2014.6962069

Abstract

Dynamic random access memory (DRAM) is the most widely used type of memory in the consumer market today, and it's still widely used for mass memories for space application. Even though accurate tests are performed by vendors to ensure high reliability, DRAM errors continue to be a common source of failures in the field. Recent large-scale studies reported how most of the errors experienced by DRAM subsystem are due to faults repeating on the same memory address but occurring only under specific condition.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. DRAM data retention faults primarily result from hard errors, particularly under high temperature conditions.
  2. Retention time decreases exponentially with temperature; a 5°C increase causes a 50% reduction in retention time.
  3. The study empirically identifies four key factors impacting DRAM retention time, enhancing fault detection strategies.
  4. Variable retention time (VRT) complicates fault detection; testing must be prolonged to capture low retention states.
  5. Data background significantly affects retention time; multiple backgrounds should be tested for comprehensive fault coverage.

References (18)

  1. B. Schroeder, E. Pinheiro, and W.-D. Weber, "Dram errors in the wild: A large-scale field study," SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 193-204, Jun. 2009. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2492101.1555372
  2. A. A. Hwang, I. A. Stefanovici, and B. Schroeder, "Cosmic rays don't strike twice: Understanding the nature of dram errors and the implications for system design," SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 111-122, Mar. 2012. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2189750.2150989
  3. X. Li, M. C. Huang, K. Shen, and L. Chu, "A realistic evaluation of memory hardware errors and software system susceptibility," in Proceedings of the 2010 USENIX Conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference, ser. USENIXATC'10. Berkeley, CA, USA: USENIX Association, 2010, pp. 6-6. [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1855840.1855846
  4. A. Avizienis, J.-C. Laprie, B. Randell, and C. Landwehr, "Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing," Dependable and Secure Computing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11-33, Jan 2004.
  5. SMART Modular Technologies, "Single-bit-errors. a memory module supplier's perspective on cause, impact and detection," 2010.
  6. JEDEC, "Synchronous dynamic random access memory (sdram)."
  7. K. Saino, S. Horiba, S. Uchiyama, Y. Takaishi, M. Takenaka, T. Uchida, Y. Takada, K. Koyama, H. Miyake, and C. Hu, "Impact of gate-induced drain leakage current on the tail distribution of dram data retention time," in Electron Devices Meeting, 2000. IEDM '00. Technical Digest. International, Dec 2000, pp. 837-840.
  8. M. Chang, J. Lin, S. Shih, T.-C. Wu, B. Huang, J. Yang, and P.-I. Lee, "Impact of gate-induced drain leakage on retention time distribution of 256 mbit dram with negative wordline bias," Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1036-1041, April 2003.
  9. A. Weber, A. Birner, and W. Krautschneider, "Data retention analysis on individual cells of 256mb dram i n 110nm technology," in Solid- State Device Research Conference, 2005. ESSDERC 2005. Proceedings of 35th European, Sept 2005, pp. 185-188.
  10. K. Kim and J. Lee, "A new investigation of data retention time in truly nanoscaled drams," Electron Device Letters, IEEE, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 846-848, Aug 2009.
  11. A. J. Van de Goor and I. Schanstra, "Address and data scrambling: causes and impact on memory tests," in Electronic Design, Test and Applications, 2002. Proceedings. The First IEEE International Workshop on, 2002, pp. 128-136.
  12. T. Hamamoto, S. Sugiura, and S. Sawada, "On the retention time dis- tribution of dynamic random access memory (dram)," Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1300-1309, Jun 1998.
  13. D. Yaney, C. Y. Lu, R. A. Kohler, M. J. Kelly, and J. Nelson, "A meta- stable leakage phenomenon in dram charge storage -variable hold time," in Electron Devices Meeting, 1987 International, vol. 33, 1987, pp. 336- 339.
  14. P. Restle, J. W. Park, and B. F. Lloyd, "Dram variable retention time," in Electron Devices Meeting, 1992. IEDM '92. Technical Digest., International, Dec 1992, pp. 807-810.
  15. B. Oh, H.-J. Cho, H. Kim, Y. Son, T. Kang, S. Park, S. Jang, J.- H. Lee, and H. Shin, "Characterization of an oxide trap leading to random telegraph noise in gate-induced drain leakage current of dram cell transistors," Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1741-1747, June 2011.
  16. H. Kim, B. Oh, K. Kim, S.-Y. Cha, J.-G. Jeong, S.-J. Hong, J.-H. Lee, B.- G. Park, and H. Shin, "Random telegraph signal-like fluctuation created by fowler-nordheim stress in gate induced drain leakage current of the saddle type dynamic random access memory cell transistor," Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 49, no. 9, p. 094102, Sep. 2010.
  17. Y. Nakagome, M. Aoki, S. Ikenaga, M. Horiguchi, S. Kimura, Y. Kawamoto, and B. Kiyoo Itoh, "The impact of data-line interference noise on dram scaling," Solid-State Circuits, IEEE Journal of, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1120-1127, Oct 1988.
  18. J. Liu, B. Jaiyen, Y. Kim, C. Wilkerson, and O. Mutlu, "An experimental study of data retention behavior in modern dram devices: Implications for retention time profiling mechanisms," SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 60-71, Jun. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2508148.2485928