Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Collective Intention Recognition and Elder Care

Abstract

The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we present a new method for collective intention recognition based on mainstream philosophical accounts. Second , we extend our previous Elder Care system with collective intention recognition ability for assisting a couple of elderly people. The previous system was just capable of individual intention recognition, and so it has now been enabled to deal with situations where the elders intend to do things together.

References (19)

  1. Baral, C.; Gelfond, M.; and Rushton, N. 2009. Proba- bilistic reasoning with answer sets. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 9(1):57-144.
  2. Bratman, M. E. 1992. Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review 101(2):327-341.
  3. Cesta, A., and Pecora, F. 2004. The robocare project: In- telligent systems for elder care. In AAAI Fall Symposium on Caring Machines: AI in Elder Care.
  4. Devaney, M., and Ram, A. 1998. Needles in a haystack: plan recognition in large spatial domains involving multi- ple agents. In Procs. 15th national conference on Artificial intelligence. AAAI.
  5. Geib, C. W. 2002. Problems with intent recognition for elder care. In Procs. AAAI Workshop Automation as Care- giver.
  6. Han, T. A.; Ramli, C. K.; and Damásio, C. V. 2008. An im- plementation of extended p-log using xasp. In Procs. Intl. Conf. Logic Programming (ICLP08), 739-743. Springer LNCS 5366.
  7. Heinze, C. 2003. Modeling Intention Recognition for In- telligent Agent Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
  8. Kanno, T., N. K. F. K. 2003. A method for team inten- tion inference. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 33(4):393-413.
  9. Mileo, A.; Merico, D.; and Bisiani., R. 2008. A logic programming approach to home monitoring for risk pre- vention in assisted living. In Procs. Intl. Conf. Logic Pro- gramming (ICLP08), 145-159. Springer LNCS 5366.
  10. Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Infer- ence. Cambridge U.P. Pereira, L. M., and Han, T. A. 2009a. Elder care via inten- tion recognition and evolution prospection. In 18th Intl. Conf. on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP'09).
  11. Pereira, L. M., and Han, T. A. 2009b. Evolution prospec- tion in decision making. Intelligent Decision Technologies 3(3):157-171.
  12. Pereira, L. M., and Han, T. A. 2009c. Intention recog- nition via causal bayes networks plus plan generation. In Progress in Artificial Intelligence, Procs. 14th Portuguese Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (EPIA'09), 138-149. Springer LNAI 5816.
  13. Pereira, L. M., and Han, T. A. 2010. Intention recognition with evolution prospection and causal bayesian networks. In Computational Intelligence for Engineering Systems 3: Emergent Applications. Springer. (forthcoming).
  14. Searle, J. R. 1990. Collective intentions and actions. In Intentions in Communication. 401-616.
  15. Searle, J. R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
  16. Sukthankar, G., and Sycara, K. 2008. Robust and efficient plan recognition for dynamic multi-agent teams. In Procs. Intl. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'08), 1383-1388.
  17. Sukthankar, G. R. 2007. Activity Recognition for Agent Teams. Ph.D. Dissertation, Robotics Institute School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University. Tomasello, M. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. MIT Press.
  18. Tuomela, R., and Miller, K. 1988. We-intentions. Philo- sophical Studies 53:367-390.
  19. Tuomela, R. 2005. We-intentions revisited. Philosophical Studies 125(3):327-369.