Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Towards capturing representative AS-level Internet topologies

2004, Computer Networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMNET.2003.03.001

Abstract

Recent studies on AS-level Internet connectivity have attracted considerable attention. These studies have exclusively relied on BGP data from the Oregon route-views [University of Oregon Route Views Project, http:// www.routeviews.org] to derive some unexpected and intriguing results. The Oregon route-views data sets reflect AS peering relationships, as reported by BGP, seen from a handful of vantage points in the global Internet. The possibility that these data sets may provide only a very sketchy picture of the complete inter-AS connectivity of the Internet has received little scrutiny. By augmenting the Oregon route-views data with BGP summary information from a large number of Internet Looking Glass sites and with routing policy information from Internet Routing Registry (IRR) databases, we find that (1) a significant number of existing AS peering relationships remain hidden from most BGP routing tables, (2) the AS peering relationships with tier-1 ASs are in general more easily observed than those with nontier-1 ASs, and there are at least about 40% more AS peering relationships in the Internet than commonly-used BGP-derived AS maps reveal (but only about 4% more ASs). These findings point out the need for continuously questioning the applicability and completeness of data sets at hand when establishing the generality of any particular Internet-specific observation and for assessing its (in)sensitivity to deficiencies in the measurements.

References (36)

  1. M. Faloutsos, P. Faloutsos, C. Faloutsos, On power-law relationships of the Internet topology, in: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, 1999.
  2. A.-L. Barab asi, R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science 286 (1999) 509-512.
  3. R. Albert, A.-L. Barab asi, Topology of evolving networks: local events and universality, Physical Review Letters 85 (2000) 5234-5237.
  4. A. Medina, A. Lakhina, I. Matta, J. Byers, BRITE: an approach to universal topology generation, in: Proceedings of MASCOTS, 2001.
  5. C.R. Palmer, J.G. Steffan, Generating network topologies that obey power laws, in: Proceedings of the Global Internet Symposium, Globecom2000, 2000.
  6. C. Jin, Q. Chen, S. Jamin, Inet: Internet topology generator, Technical Report UM-CSE-TR-433-00, Uni- versity of Michigan, EECS Department, Available from <http://topology.eecs.umich.edu/inet> 2000.
  7. H. Tangmunarunkit, R. Govindan, S. Shenker, D. Estrin, The impact of policy on Internet paths, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2001.
  8. H. Tangmunarunkit, R. Govindan, S. Shenker, Internet path inflation due to policy routing, in: Proceedings of SPIE ITCom, 2001.
  9. L. Gao, F. Wang, The extent of AS path inflation by routing policies, in: Proceedings of IEEE Global Internet Symposium, 2002.
  10. K. Park, H. Lee, On the effectiveness of route-based packet filtering for distributed DoS attack prevention in power- law Internets, in: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, 2001.
  11. Y. Chu, S. Rao, H. Zhang, A case for end system multicast, in: Proceedings of ACM Sigmetrics, 2000.
  12. National Laboratory for Applied Network Research, NLANR RouteViews archive, Available from <http:// moat.nlanr.net/Routing/rawdata>.
  13. Y. Rekhter, T. Li, A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), RFC 1771, March 1995.
  14. R. Govindan, A. Reddy, An analysis of inter-domain topology and route stability, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 1997.
  15. A. Broido, K. Claffy, Internet topology: connectivity of IP graphs, in: Proceedings of SPIE ITCom, 2001.
  16. S. Yook, H. Jeong, A.-L. Barab asi, Modeling the InternetÕs large-scale topology, 2001, preprint.
  17. W. Willinger, R. Govindan, S. Jamin, V. Paxson, S. Shenker, Scaling phenomena in the Internet: critically examining criticality, Proceedings of the National Acad- emy of Sciences 99 (2002) 2573-2580.
  18. Swiss Network Operators Group, Available from <http:// www.swinog.ch/tools.html>.
  19. A. Broido, K. Claffy, Analysis of BGP data from Oregon route views, in: Workshop on Network-Related Data Management, NRDM 2001.
  20. H. Chang, R. Govindan, S. Jamin, S. Shenker, W. Willinger, Towards capturing representative AS-level Internet topologies, Technical Report UM-CSE-TR-454- 02, University of Michigan, EECS Department, 2002.
  21. L. Subramanian, S. Agarwal, J. Rexford, R. H. Katz, Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from multiple van- tage points, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2002.
  22. L. Gao, On inferring autonomous system relationships on the Internet, in: Proceedings of IEEE Global Internet Symposium, 2000.
  23. E. Chen, J. Stewart, A Framework for Inter-domain Route Aggregation, RFC 2519, February 1999.
  24. P. Traina, D. McPherson, J. Scudder, Autonomous System Confederations for BGP, RFC 3065, February 2001.
  25. W. B. Norton, Interconnection strategies for ISPs, unpub- lished manuscript, 2001.
  26. Traceroute.org, Public route server and looking glass list, Available from <http://www.traceroute.org/>.
  27. Merit Network, Internet routing registry, Available from <http://www.irr.net>.
  28. C. Alaettinoglu, C. Villamizar, E. Gerich, D. Kessens, D. Meyer, T. Bates, D. Karrenberg, M. Terpstra, Routing Policy Specification Language (RPSL), RFC 2622, June 1999.
  29. R. Govindan, C. Alaettinoglu, G. Eddy, D. Kessens, S. Kumar, W. Lee, An architecture for stable, analyzable Internet routing, IEEE Network 13 (1) (1999) 29- 35.
  30. K. Oberman, J. Haas, Route registry: who uses them? Posting to the NANOG mailing list, October 2000.
  31. London Internet Exchange (LINX), Memorandum of understanding, Available from <http://www.linx.net/join- ing/mou.thtml>.
  32. CERN Internet eXchange Point (CIXP), Technical oper- ational environment and principles, Available from <http://wwwcs.cern.ch/public/services/cixp/cernixp.tech- nical.html>.
  33. Internet Neutral Exchange (INEX), Memorandum of understanding, Available from <http://www.inex.ie/inex- mou.html>.
  34. S. McCreary, B. Woodcock, PCH RouteViews archive, Available from <http://www.pch.net/documents/data/rout- ing-tables>.
  35. Merit Network, Internet routing registry mirror site, Available from <ftp://ftp.radb.net/routing.arbiter/radb/ dbase/>.
  36. A. Lakhina, J. Byers, M. Crovella, P. Xie, Sampling biases in IP topology measurements, in: Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2003.