Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Development of a mixed control volume – Finite element method

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPFLUID.2010.09.026

Abstract

In this paper we attack the problem of devising a finite volume method for computational fluid dynamics and related phenomena which can deal with complex geometries while attaining high-orders of accuracy and spectral convergence at a reasonable computational cost. As a first step towards this end, we propose a control volume finite element method for the solution of the advection–diffusion equation. The numerical method and its implementation are carefully tested in the paper where h- and p-convergence are checked by comparing numerical results against analytical solutions in several relevant test-cases. The numerical efficiency of a selected set of operations implemented is estimated by operation counts, ill-conditioning of coefficient matrices is avoided by using an appropriate distribution of interpolation points and control-volume edges.

References (16)

  1. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover; 1972.
  2. Baliga BR, Patankar SV. A control volume finite-element method for two- dimensional fluid flow and heat transfer. Numer Heat Transfer, Part B 1983;6:245-61.
  3. Banaszek J. Comparison of control volume and Galerkin finite element methods for diffusion-type problems. Numer Heat Transfer, Part B 1989;16:59-78.
  4. Comini G, Del Giudice S, Nonino C. Energy balances in CVFEM and GFEM formulations of convection-type problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 1996;39:2249-63.
  5. Comini G, Minkowycz WJ, Shyy W. General algorithms for the finite element solution of incompressible flow problems using primitive variables. In: Minkowycz WJ, Sparrow EM, editors. Advances in numerical heat transfer. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis; 1997.
  6. Gooch CO, Van Altena M. A high-order-accurate unstructured mesh finite- volume scheme for the advection-diffusion equation. J Comput Phys 2002;181:729-52.
  7. Hildebrand FB. Introduction to numerical analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Dover; 1974.
  8. Horn RA, Johnson CR. Matrix analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
  9. Hughes TJR, Engel G, Mazzei L, Larson MG. The continuous Galerkin method is locally conservative. J Comput Phys 2000;163:467-88.
  10. Karniadakis GE, Sherwin SJ. Spectral/hp element methods for CFD. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  11. Kr ˇı `z ˇek M. Superconvergence phenomena in the finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 1994;116:157-63.
  12. Martinez MJ. Comparison of Galerkin and control volume finite element for advection-diffusion problems. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2006;50: 347-76.
  13. Quarteroni A. Numerical models for differential problems. 2nd ed. Italia, Milano: Springer-Verlag; 2009.
  14. Stenberg R, Suri M. Mixed hp finite element methods for problems in elasticity and Stokes flow. Numer Math 1996;72:367-89.
  15. Zhang M, Shu CW. An analysis of three different formulations of the discontinuous Galerkin method for diffusion equations. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 2003;13:395-413.
  16. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL. The finite element method, vol. 1. Elsevier; 2000.