Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Method
Results and Discussion
Keyword Analysis
Conclusions
References
All Topics
Agriculture
Agribusiness

TREND OF 100 TOP-CITED ARTICLES ON AGRICULTURAL RISK

Profile image of Nader Ale Ebrahim نادر آل ابراهیمNader Ale Ebrahim نادر آل ابراهیمProfile image of Mohd Mansor IsmailMohd Mansor Ismail

Abstract

This study reviews the trend of top-cited risk publications in the field of agricultural economics. The publication data are downloaded from the database of Science Citation Index (SCI) Web of Science. Citation analysis and statistical methods are used for nominating and exploring the bibliometric dimensions of the top-cited articles such as top authors, journals, trends of publication and the performance of institutes and countries. The results display a negative impact of collaboration of authors and countries on citation, which contradicts the trends in the other fields of study. The results provide a better understanding of trends in agricultural risk and agricultural economics research, and indicate the direction for future studies.

Related papers

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION (2008-2017) : A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY
MANOJ K U M A R VERMA

Indian Jourrnal of Information Library and Society, 2018

The present study aims to analyse the publication pattern of the Journal of Agricultural Extension during the period of 2008-2017 on the basis of bibliometric parameters. There are a total of 303 articles published in the journal during 10 years period i.e. 2008-2017 with 0.33 average author productivity and a maximum number of articles 47 (15.51%) published in the year 2017. The publication pattern of the journal is collaborative research and 97(32.01%) articles published in joint authorship followed by three authors with 92 (30.36%) articles publications and the average degree of collaboration is 0.9. Nigeria got the first rank with 289 contributions followed by Kenya with 3 contributions and occupied the second rank

View PDFchevron_right
A Bibliometric Analysis of International Journal of Agriculture Sciences (2009-2014).
Sapan Shah

Present paper presents a bibliometric analysis of 81 articles published in six volumes of 'International Journal of Agriculture Sciences' during 2009-2014. All contributions of research papers have been carefully examined to ascertain the year wise distribution of articles, authorship pattern, geographical distribution of contributions, country wise contribution, prolific contributors of articles, average number of references per article, form of documents referred to and age of references, etc. It has been found that majority of the articles published in 'International Journal of Agriculture Sciences' are an outcome of the collaborative research, the degree of collaboration is 0.8765 which clearly indicates the dominance of collaborative research upon individual contributions. Journals are the primary sources of references used for writing research papers/ articles. A list of most frequently referred journals has also been compiled to identify the core journals used by scientists for writing research papers/ articles.

View PDFchevron_right
A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Risks in the Poultry Farming Industry: Trends, Themes, Collaborations, and Technology Utilization
Kamal Imran Mohd Sharif

International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications

This paper explores the risks prevalent in the poultry farming industry, drawing upon an extensive examination conducted by researchers over the past decade. Employing a bibliometric analysis approach, a comprehensive search of the Scopus database was conducted using relevant keywords related to poultry farming risk and technology utilization. The search spanned from 2002 to 2022, yielding 345 pertinent documents. This study presents an overview of the current state of publications concerning poultry farming risk and its intersection with technology utilization. It delves into citation patterns, prevalent themes, and authorship analysis, focusing on the role of technology in mitigating risks. The comprehensive citation analysis highlights the impact of technology-related studies in the field. Frequency analysis employed Microsoft Excel, while VOSviewer facilitated data visualization. Harzing's Publish or Perish software was used for citation metrics and analysis. The findings reveal a consistent increase in publications on risk in poultry farming since 2002, particularly in relation to technology utilization. The United States emerges as the most active country in this area of research, with Wageningen University from the Netherlands identified as the most prolific institution contributing significantly to risk in poultry farming research, including technology applications. The research involved 32 scholars from 70 different countries and 32 distinct institutions, reflecting the multi-authorship and multicultural nature of the research. It is important to note that this paper focuses solely on the Scopus database, while future researchers may consider alternative databases for new studies, recognizing the expanding role of technology in addressing risks in the poultry farming industry.

View PDFchevron_right
Evaluating and Comparing the Quality of the Agronomy and Crop Science Journals Using Bibliometric Indicators
Md Safiqur Rahaman

science and technology libraries, 2023

The field of agronomy and crop science plays a crucial role in ensuring global food security and sustainable agricultural practices. In the realm of scholarly publications, bibliometric indicators have emerged as invaluable tools for quantifying and comparing the impact, reach, and significance of such contributions. Various bibliometric indicators were employed for the study, including Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Score, Cite Score, and h-index. To accomplish this, we compiled a roster of 90 agronomy and crop science journals using the Journal Citation Report (JCR) within the Web of Science (WOS), journal metrics from the Scopus database (Cite Score and SNIP), and h5-index from Google Scholar. The SCImago Journal Ranking (SJR) was obtained from its official website. Subsequently, we conducted Bivariate Pearson's (r) and Spearman's (ρ) correlation coefficient tests to assess ranking correlations. The study revealed notable positive correlations particularly, a strong Pearson's (r) correlation evident between the Impact Factor (JIF) and both the Cite Score (CS) and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicators, yielding values of (r = 0.962) and (r = 0.932), respectively. Interestingly, despite the distinct mathematical foundations underpinning the various citation-based bibliometric indices scrutinized, our findings underscored their robust correlations when it comes to ranking agronomy and crop science journals.

View PDFchevron_right
Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment: Methodological Guidance for Practitioners
Stephen D'Alessandro

2016

View PDFchevron_right
Journals Published in Agricultural Field in The Last Five Years Bibliometric Analysis
Malik Yılmaz, Muhammet Ünal Arvas

Today, scientific publications published in every field offer important contributions to both scientific activities and technological developments. As a matter of fact, access to information is fast and easy, and scientific activities can be observed and analyzed. The bibliometry, which performs the quantitative analysis of scientific publications, enables the analysis of publications published in a particular discipline or in all disciplines, as well as a general structure of the discipline in question. In this study, the development of agricultural and related published articles in WOS and Scopus database within five years is explained by bibliometric analysis. In this context, the results of the surveys on the subject of agriculture in WOS and Scopus were limited to five years. The obtained data were transferred to Excel and their graphics were prepared. In addition, data were analyzed in Bibexcel program for analyzing the number of authors of multi-author articles of this data. The findings were evaluated and evaluations were made about publications published in the literature related to agriculture within five years.

View PDFchevron_right
Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Specification and Estimation of Production Risk, Risk Preferences and Technical
Erny Sirappa

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

View PDFchevron_right
Citation Analysis of Dissertations and Theses Submitted to the Department of Agricultural Economics And Extension, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria
Joseph Fasae
View PDFchevron_right
Exploring Recent Trends in Agricultural Economics with a Focus on Agritech and Agribusiness
Loso Judijanto

West Science Interdisciplinary Studies

This research presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of current trends in agricultural economics with a specific emphasis on agritech and agribusiness. Leveraging advanced bibliometric tools, the study explores co-authorship networks, citation patterns, and thematic clusters within the scholarly literature. Key findings highlight influential authors, seminal publications, and emerging themes. The analysis sheds light on the evolving landscape of agricultural economics, emphasizing the transformative influences of technology and evolving business models. The results contribute to a nuanced understanding of the interdisciplinary nature of agricultural economics, offering valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners navigating the complexities of modern agriculture.

View PDFchevron_right
Ranking of 25 Agricultural Economics Departments and Their Faculties by Citation Counts, 1966-1988
Dale W Adams

1990

View PDFchevron_right

References (37)

  1. Aksnes, D.W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers, Research Evaluation 12, 159-170.
  2. Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M.A., Danaee, M., Mohammadjafari, M., Zavvari, A., Shakiba, M. and Shahbazi- Moghadam, M. (2014). Equality of Google Scholar with Web of Science Citations: Case of Malaysian Engineering Highly Cited Papers, Modern Applied Science 8, 63-69.
  3. Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M.A., Habibi Tanha, F., Gholizadeh, H. and Motahar, S.M. (2014). Visibility and Citation Impact, International Education Studies 7, 120-125.
  4. Ale Ebrahim, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M.A., Habibi Tanha, F., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S.M. and Ordi, A. (2013). Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency, International Education Studies 6, 93-99.
  5. Bajwa, R., Yaldram, K. and Rafique, S. (2013). A scientometric assessment of research output in nanoscience and nanotechnology: Pakistan perspective, Scientometrics 94, 333-342.
  6. Brandt, J.S., Downing, A.C., Howard, D.L., Kofinas, J.D. and Chasen, S.T. (2010). Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 203, 355. e351-355. e357.
  7. Breustedt, G., Bokusheva, R. and Heidelbach, O. (2008). Evaluating the potential of index insurance schemes to reduce crop yield risk in an arid region, Journal of Agricultural Economics 59, 312-328.
  8. Canas-Guerrero, I., Mazarron, F.R., Calleja-Perucho, C. and Pou-Merina, A. (2014). Bibliometric analysis in the international context of the "Construction & Building Technology" category from the Web of Science database, Construction And Building Materials 53, 13-25.
  9. Cao, Y., Zhou, S.X. and Wang, G.B. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of global laparoscopy research trends during 1997- 2011, Scientometrics 96, 717-730.
  10. ^(eds.) (Year). Ethics of scientific publication: (Mal)-practices and Consequentialism, Proceedings of the Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on; 23-24 May 2014 2014.
  11. Chiu, W.-T. and Ho, Y.-S. (2007). Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research, Scientometrics 73, 3-17.
  12. Chuang, K.-Y., Wang, M.-H. and Ho, Y.-S. (2011). High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information, Scientometrics 87, 551-562.
  13. Chuang, K.Y., Wang, M.H. and Ho, Y.S. (2011). High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information, Scientometrics 87, 551-562.
  14. Dillon, A., Mueller, V. and Salau, S. (2011). Migratory Responses to Agricultural Risk in Northern Nigeria, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93, 1048-1061.
  15. Engler-Palma, A. and Hoag, D.L. (2007). Accounting for risk and stability in technology adoption, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie 55, 365-379.
  16. Fooladi, M., Salehi, H., Yunus, M.M., Farhadi, M., Aghaei Chadegani, A., Farhadi, H. and Ale Ebrahim, N. (2013). Do Criticisms Overcome the Praises of Journal Impact Factor?, Asian Social Science 9, 176-182.
  17. Gambelli, D., Solfanelli, F. and Zanoli, R. (2014). Feasibility of risk-based inspections in organic farming: results from a probabilistic model, Agricultural Economics 45, 267-277.
  18. Garfield, E. (1990). KEYWORDS PLUS-ISI'S BREAKTHROUGH RETRIEVAL METHOD. 1. EXPANDING YOUR SEARCHING POWER ON CURRENT-CONTENTS ON DISKETTE, Current Contents 32, 5-9.
  19. Gedeon, J., Shamlaye, C., Myers, G.J. and Bovet, P. (2013). Epidemiology and public health research productivity in Africa, International journal of epidemiology 42, 913-913.
  20. Hilmer, C.E. and Lusk, J.L. (2009). Determinants of citations to the agricultural and applied economics association journals, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 31, 677-694.
  21. Ho, Y.-S. (2012). Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 20, 478-488.
  22. Ho, Y.S. (2014). Classic articles on social work field in Social Science Citation Index: a bibliometric analysis, Scientometrics 98, 137-155.
  23. Horowitz, J.K. and Carson, R.T. (1991). A CLASSIFICATION TREE FOR PREDICTING CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR RISK REDUCTION, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 1416-1421.
  24. Jones, K. and Evans, K. (2013). Good Practices for Improving Citations to your Published Work, University of BATH, pp 2.
  25. Kear, R. and Colbert-Lewis, D. (2011). Citation searching and bibliometric measures: Resources for ranking and tracking, College & Research Libraries News 72, 470-474.
  26. Kirsten, J.F. (2011). Agricultural economics scholarship in South Africa at the crossroads: Is it time for a national institute of food, agricultural and resource economics?, Agrekon 50, 124-144.
  27. Krause, K. (2009). Increasing your Article's Citation Rates, Open Access Week., (Serial online). Available from URL: http://works.bepress.com/kate_krause/12/ [accessed 28 May 2013].
  28. Nikolic, N., Bagliniere, J.L., Rigaud, C., Gardes, C., Masquilier, M.L. and Taverny, C. (2011). Bibliometric analysis of diadromous fish research from 1970s to 2010: a case study of seven species, Scientometrics 88, 929-947.
  29. Parker, J., Doulman, D. and Collins, J. (2010). Citation analysis for the 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, Marine Policy 34, 139-144.
  30. Perry, G.M. (2012). WAEA presidential address deciding where to publish: Some observations on journal impact factor and article influence score, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 37, 335-348.
  31. Priem, J. (2013). Scholarship: Beyond the paper, Nature 495, 437-440.
  32. Purcell, W.D. and Hudson, W.T. (2003). Risk sharing and compensation guides for managers and members of vertical beef alliances, Review of Agricultural Economics 25, 44-65.
  33. Serra, T., Zilberman, D. and Gil, J.M. (2008). Differential uncertainties and risk attitudes between conventional and organic producers: the case of Spanish arable crop farmers, Agricultural Economics 39, 219-229.
  34. Shotton, D. (2013). Publishing: Open citations, Nature 502, 295-297.
  35. Tan, J., Fu, H.-Z. and Ho, Y.-S. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of research on proteomics in Science Citation Index Expanded, Scientometrics 98, 1473-1490.
  36. Yeager, E.A. (2011). Impact of risk on cost and revenue efficiencies.
  37. Zyoud, S.H., Al-Jabi, S.W., Sweileh, W.M. and Awang, R. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of toxicology research productivity in Middle Eastern Arab countries during a 10-year period (2003-2012), Health Research Policy and Systems 12, 13.

Related papers

Going Beyond Impact Factors: A Survey-based Journal Ranking by Agricultural Economists
Ernst Berg

Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2011

A consistent and comprehensive ranking of journals relevant for agricultural economists cannot rely on impact factors for at least two major reasons: (i) the scientific database by Thomson Reuters, on which the standard impact factor is based, includes only a very limited number of relevant journals; (ii) the standard impact factor cannot be compared across research fields of different sizes. Survey-based journal rankings may overcome these problems. We report on such a survey-based ranking initiated by the Agricultural Economics Associations of Germany and Austria. Results of the ranking and a classification of journals, i.e. a rating, are provided for 160 selected journals. Scientific quality is assessed by an index based on the researchers' perception of the quality standards of each journal and of the quality of its published articles. The survey-based ranking allows a much more comprehensive and consistent ranking than the impact factor, as specific agricultural economics journals can be directly compared with neighbouring economic and interdisciplinary journals to which agricultural economists submit their work. The low impact factors of core agricultural economics journals are put into perspective. The scientific quality of the top agricultural economics journals is assessed as being rather high and above most of the 1 Roland Herrmann is with the Institute relevant interdisciplinary journals from agricultural and food sciences that are typically characterised by higher impact factors. Agricultural economists' perceptions on the scientific quality of the journals vary more across journals than perceptions of their relevance.

View PDFchevron_right
Assessing the Usefulness of Publications by Agricultural Economists Through Citations
Dale W Adams

1985

View PDFchevron_right
Citations, Research and Agricultural Economists in 25 Universities, 1966-1990
Dale W Adams

1992

View PDFchevron_right
Risk in Agriculture: Proceedings of the Tenth Agriculture Sector Symposium
Peter Hazell

1991

All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing November 1991 These symposium proceedings are not a formal publication of the World Bank and are circulated to encourage discussion and comment and to communicate information quickly to the development community; citation and the use of these proceedings should take account of their provisional character. To present the results of research with the least possible delay, the typescript has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts, and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author(s) and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Requests for permission to reproduce portions of it should be sent to Director, Publications Department, at the address shown in the copyright notice above. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally give permission promptly and, when the reproduction is for noncommercial purposes, without asking a fee. Permission to photocopy portions for classroom use is not required, though notification of such use having been made will be appreciated. The complete backlist of publications from the World Bank is shown in the annual Index of Publications, which contains an alphabetical title list (with full ordering information) and indexes of subjects, authors, and countries and regions. The latest edition is available free of charge from the

View PDFchevron_right
Mapping in the Topic of Mathematical Model in Paddy Agricultural Insurance Based on Bibliometric Analysis: A Systematic Review Approach
Noriszura Ismail

Computation, 2022

Bibliometric analysis is the quantitative study of bibliographic material. In this paper, a systematic review of papers, authors, and journals is carried out. This is necessary to determine and set targets to be achieved in further research. The main objective of this study is to identify some of the most relevant research and the latest trends according to the information found in the Google Scholar, Publish or Perish, Science Direct, and Dimension databases. The methods used are classification, analysis of the most cited journals of all time, and the most prolific and influential authors. The results are information on the number of papers, citations, researchers, h-index, g-index, major reference journals, and visualization of research roadmaps for the topic of agricultural insurance mathematical models. The research findings identify the core themes, which are used as research gaps for future research.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Agriculture
  • PRODUCTION RISKS
  • Citation Analysis
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved