Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Personalized Instruction of Physical Skills with a Social Robot

Abstract

While robots have been used extensively for the purpose of teaching symbolic knowledge, using robots to teach or refine motor skills of humans, such as swinging a bat, or shooting a basketball, is underserved. Robots are uniquely well situated to observe physical movements, identify problems, prioritize which problems to address first, and to patiently communicate personalized advice to the student. We propose an architecture to coach physical skills, and focus on the second and third of these challenges-identifying problems with the movements , and prioritizing which to address first-as applied to the domain of shooting a basketball. We present a supervised learning approach to prioritize which problems to work on, and propose the design of several user studies that will determine the effectiveness of the algorithm .

References (10)

  1. Bainbridge, W. A.; Hart, J.; Kim, E. S.; and Scassellati, B. 2008. The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. In The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2008, 701- 706. Munich, Germany: IEEE.
  2. Bobbert, M. F.; Hoogendoorn, M.; van Soest, A. J.; Ste- bletsova, V.; and Treur, J. 2013. Ambient support by a personal coach for exercising and rehabilitation. In Human Aspects in Ambient Intelligence. Springer. 89-106.
  3. Feil-Seifer, D., and Mataric, M. J. 2005. Defining socially assistive robotics. In International Conference on Rehabili- tation Robotics, 465-468. IEEE.
  4. Grer, B.; Salah, A.; and Akn, H. 2013. A robotic fitness coach for the elderly. In Augusto, J.; Wichert, R.; Collier, R.; Keyson, D.; Salah, A.; and Tan, A.-H., eds., Ambient Intelli- gence, volume 8309 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing. 124-139.
  5. Leite, I.; Castellano, G.; Pereira, A.; Martinho, C.; and Paiva, A. 2012. Long-term interactions with empathic robots: Evaluating perceived support in children. In Ge, S.; Khatib, O.; Cabibihan, J.-J.; Simmons, R.; and Williams, M.-A., eds., Social Robotics, volume 7621 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 298-307.
  6. Leyzberg, D.; Spaulding, S.; Toneva, M.; and Scassellati, B. 2010. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cog- nitive learning gains. In 34th Annual Conference of the Cog- nitive Science Society, Cog. Sci. '12.
  7. Leyzberg, D.; Spaulding, S.; and Scassellati, B. 2014. Per- sonalizing robot tutors to individuals' learning differences. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Con- ference on Human-robot Interaction, HRI '14, 423-430. Bielefeld, Germany: ACM.
  8. Ros, R.; Baroni, I.; and Demiris, Y. 2014. Adaptive hu- manrobot interaction in sensorimotor task instruction: From human to robot dance tutors. Robotics and Autonomous Sys- tems.
  9. Volpe, B.; Krebs, H.; Hogan, N.; Edelstein, L.; Diels, C.; and Aisen, M. 2000. A novel approach to stroke reha- bilitation robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 54(10):1938-1944.
  10. Wade, E.; Parnandi, A.; Mead, R.; and Matari, M. 2011. Socially assistive robotics for guiding motor task practice. Paladyn 2(4):218-227.