Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Perceptually-motivated audio morphing: brightness

Abstract

A system for morphing the brightness of two sounds independently from their other perceptual or acoustic attributes was coded, based on the Spectral Modelling Synthesis additive/residual model. A Multidimensional Scaling analysis of listening test responses showed that the brightness control was perceptually independent from the other controls used to adjust the morphed sound. A Timbre Morpher, providing perceptually meaningful controls for additional timbral attributes, can now be considered for further work.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What was the effect of manipulating the spectral centroid on perceived brightness?add

The study finds that manipulating the spectral centroid allows listeners to perceive tonal brightness changes, confirming a unidimensionality in the morphing process.

How does the new morphing system compare to existing audio morphers?add

The research reveals that traditional audio morphers lack perceptual control, while the new spectral centroid morpher permits targeted brightness manipulation.

What listeners' experience was reported during the morphing tests?add

Listeners found it challenging to distinguish between stimuli due to noise in perception, impacting differentiation accuracy.

Which audio sources were used for testing the brightness morphing system?add

Testing utilized synthetic sawtooth and triangle waves, allowing a controlled comparison of harmonic structures.

What methodology was employed to analyze listener responses in the study?add

Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) analysis quantified listener ratings, demonstrating a good fit with a 2-D representation.

References (13)

  1. M. Slaney, M. Covell, and B. Lassiter. Automatic Audio Morphing. In Proc. ICASSP, Atlanta, Georgia, 1996.
  2. B Holloway, E Tellman, L Haken. Timbre Morphing of Sounds with Unequal Numbers of Features. AES Journal, Vol 43, no 9, pp 678-689. 1995
  3. Minna Ilmoniemi, Vesa Välimäki, Minna Huotilainen. Subjective Evaluation of Musical Instrument Timbre Modifications. Joint Baltic- Nordic Acoustics Meeting 8-10 June 2004, Mariehamn, Åland. 2004.
  4. V Menon, D Levitin, B Smith, A Lembke,. B Karsnow, D Glazer, G lover, SMcAdams. Neural Correlates of Timbre Change in Harmonic Sounds. Dept of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences. Stanford University, California, 94305. 2001.
  5. S McAdams, S Winsberg, S Donnadieu, S De Soete, J Krimphoff. Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificies, and latent subject classes. Psychol Res: 58 pp 177-192. 1995.
  6. X Serra. Musical Sound Modelling With Sinusoids Plus Noise. Published in Musical Signal Processing, Swets & Zeitlinger. 1997
  7. J.H. Halberstein. Recursive, complex Fourier analysis for real-time applications. Proc. IEEE, Vol.54, no.6, p 903 1966.
  8. J Allen. Short Term Spectral Analysis, Synthesis, and Modification by Discrete Fourier Transform. IEEE Trnasactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 25(3): pp235-238. 1977.
  9. T Quatieri, R McAulay. Speech analysis/synthesis based on a sinusoidal representation. MIT Lincoln, 1985.
  10. X Serra, J Bonada. Sound Transformations Based on the SMS High Level Attributes. Audiovisual Institute, Pompeu Fabra University
  11. T Neher, T.Brookes & F.Rumsey, "A Hybrid Technique for Validating Unidimensionality of Perceptual Variation in a Spatial Auditory Stimulus Set", Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 54(4), April 2006, p259-275
  12. J Hair, R Anderson, R Tatham, W Black. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 1998.
  13. S. S. Schiffman, M. L. Reynolds and F. W. Young, Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications. Academic Press, New York. 1981.