Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Internet and the Shifting Grounds of Knowledge

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Internet and the Explosion of Knowledge The impact of information technology revolution has been so globally comprehensive that all the available tools of academic inquiry – media theory, cultural studies, political economy, philosophy etc. – have been employed to study them and we have a vast literature addressing this issue. What is conspicuous by its relative absence is any concerted attempt to understand the explosion in the field of knowledge and major changes in the rules of the knowledge game as a result of the Internet revolution. This is despite the fact that such an inquiry was inaugurated even before the advent of world wide web by the well-known French philosopher Lyotard in this book ‘The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge’ in the early eighties. “As the economy becomes postindustrial, the culture becomes postmodern” was the formulation Lyotard advances his enquiry from. He went on to analyze the transformations of knowledge in the wake of new information technologies. At the level of practice, however, the academic world is abuzz with the impact of the restructuring that is going on accompanying the information revolution and is plagued by enormous anxieties regarding a whole range of issues from diluting of standards to subjection of researchers to the management. Outside the academia, however, the theme of ‘knowledge’ and ‘explosion of knowledge’ has been circulating widely in the spheres of media, economy, politics and society. ‘Knowledge society’, knowledge economy, knowledge management, dot the pages of policy documents, conferences, blogs, mailing lists etc. With the emergence of open source software and the attempts to apply its underlying philosophy to other fields, the idea of ‘knowledge commons’ has become the repository of utopian longings as well as inspiration for practical efforts to open up access to knowledge and advance cooperative models of knowledge production. In this whole discourse of ‘knowledge’ it is understood implicitly that computers and Internet are going to play a central role in the organization of knowledge globally and that they are already doing so to a great extent. This state of affairs can be understood on the assumption that the meaning of knowledge itself has changed in the transition to the information age. That is why one can often find the argument that what has changed with the Internet is merely the communication of knowledge and the assertions to the effect that information is not knowledge. The conception of knowledge that the university is built upon is no longer the same in the realm of the Internet and in some sense information is indeed knowledge. In the proposed paper, we seek to explore the new conception of knowledge that is in the making in the era of pervasive information technology. For example, what kind of knowledge does software constitute? Software is merely a ‘tool’, or a technique, if seen from the old perspective. But construction of software constitutes one of the most important knowledge activities for the connected world. Or, what is the knowledge that knowledge management speaks of and seeks to manage? We will try to look at the range of knowledge activities that take place in and through the Internet to explore whether the contours of a newly emerging conception of knowledge can be discerned. In the process we will attempt to clarify in what sense can the ‘digital information’ be considered to be knowledge. It is our understanding that only when armed with such a clarity on the question of the relationship of knowledge and information, can we approach the question of the significance of the ‘explosion’ of knowledge seen to be occurring with the rise of the new information technologies. We examine whether we can characterize the transition that has taken place in the conceptions of knowledge as a transition from science to information, i.e., as a transition from knowledge as representation to representations and organization of knowledge. In this paper, we examine some of the consequences of this transition on the world of knowledge.

References (6)

  1. i Nicolas Gulhot : Paideia 2.0. http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/knowledgerules/2008/03/10/paideia-20/ This is a contribution on the blog 'Knowledge Rules' [http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/knowledgerules/], a good site for reflections on our theme. ii Quoted by Mirowski on p. 5
  2. iii Quoted by Mirowski p. 15
  3. iv Philip Mirowski: Machine Dreams: Economics becomes a cyborg science, Cambridge University Press, 2002. v J. David Bolter: Turing's Man: Western Culture In the Computer Age, Penguin, 1986. vi Hans Jonas: "Cybernetics and Purpose" in The Phenomenon of Life: Towards a philosophical biology. vii Karl Polanyi: The Great Transformation: The political and economic origins of our time, Beacon Press, 2001. First published in 1944.
  4. viii New Command and the Knowledge Question, Invitation for contributions to a workshop on "Virtuality and Knowledge In Society" held at World Social Forum, Karachi. [http://www.vidyaashram.org/dialogues.html] ix Also see the World Bank report to which Guilhot also refers: Constructing Knowledge Societies http://www- wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2002/11/01/000094946_021022042031
  5. /Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf x See the Edufactory website www.edu-factory.org for contributions to extended round of debates on the 'conflict and transformations of the university'.
  6. xi See a set of attempts at such knowledge dialogues at the Vidya Ashram Website www.vidyaashram.org