Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

ON THE RECONSTRUCTION OF SEMANTIC DATA IN RASTER MAP IMAGES

Abstract

Raster map images consist of a set of layers depicted in arbitrary color. There exist strong correspondence between the color o the layer and its semantic meaning. Often there is a need to separate or extract semantic layers from the maps. The separation results in severe artifacts in places where semantic layers would overlap (e.g. elevations lines drawn on top of the topographic map). In the current work, we design the technique to reconstruct the semantic layers from the color layers resulting from the image separation process. The proposed technique provides good visual quality of the reconstructed image layers, and can therefore be applied for selective layer removal/extraction, which is often necessary in map processing and analyzing applications. It improves the accuracy of the data analysis and measurement tasks. It also alleviates compression deficiency of reconstructed layers versus corrupted ones with lossless compression algorithms (ITU Group 4, PNG, JBIG). The technique requires few computation resources and can therefore be successfully used in mobile computers and terminals.

References (18)

  1. Fox E.A., et al. (Eds.), 1995. "Digital Libraries". [Special issue of] Communications of the ACM 38 (4).
  2. NLS: National Land Survey of Finland, Opastinsilta 12 C, P.O.Box 84, 00521 Helsinki, Finland. http://www.nls.fi/index_e.html.
  3. Fränti P., Ageenko E., Kopylov P., Gröhn S. and Berger F., 2004. "Compression of map images for real-time applications", Image and Vision Computing, 22 (13), November 2004, pp. 1105-1115.
  4. Pitas, I., Venetsanopoulos A.N., 1990. Nonlinear digital filters: principles and applications, Boston, Mass.: Kluwer.
  5. Dougherty E.R., Astola J. (eds), 1997. Nonlinear Filters for Image Processing, SPIE Optical Engineering Press.
  6. Serra J., 1982. Image Analysis and Mathematical morphology. London: Academic Press.
  7. Matheron G., 1975. Random Sets and Integral Geometry, J. Wiley & Sons, New York.
  8. Dougherty E.R., 1992, Optimal mean-square n-observation digital morphological filters. Part I: Optimal binary filters, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 55, pp. 36-54.
  9. Heijmans H.J.A.M., 1994, Morphological image operators. Boston: Academic Press.
  10. Ting D., Prasada B., 1980. Digital Processing Techniques for Encoding of Graphics. Proceedings of IEEE, 68 (7), pp. 757-769.
  11. Wah, F.M., 1986, A binary image preprocessor for document quality improvement and data reduction, Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing-ICASSP'86, pp. 2459-2462.
  12. Zhang Q., Danskin J.M., 1996. Bitmap reconstruction for document image compression. SPIE Proc. Multimedia Storage, Archiving Systems, Boston, MA, USA, Vol. 2916, pp.188-199.
  13. Ping Z., Lihui C., Alex K.C., 2000. Text document filters using morphological and geometrical features of characters, Proc. Int. Conf on Signal Processing-ICSP'00, pp. 472-475.
  14. Randolph T.R., Smith M.J.T., 2001. Enhancement of fax documents using a binary angular representation, Proc. Int. Symposium on Intelligent Multimedia, Video and Signal Processing, Hong Kong China, 2-4 May 2001, pp. 125-128.
  15. Zheng Q., Kanungo T., 2001. Morphological degradation models and their use in document image restoration, University of Maryland, USA, Technical Report, LAMP-TR-065 CAR-TR-962 N660010028910/IIS9987944.
  16. Ageenko E., Fränti P., 2000. Context-based filtering of document images, Pattern Recognition Letters, 21 (6-7), Elsevier Science, pp, 483-491.
  17. Kolesnikov A., Fränti P., 2005. Data reduction of large vector graphics, Pattern Recognition, 38(3), pp 381-394.
  18. Ageenko E. and Podlasov A., 2005, "Rapid implementation of image processing algorithms with ImageJ", Proc. IADIS Informatics International Conference (I2005), within the IADIS Virtual Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (MCCSIS 2005), April 11-29, to appear.