Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Conjunctive queries for a tractable fragment of OWL 1.1

2007, The Semantic Web

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_23

Abstract

Despite the success of the Web Ontology Language OWL, the development of expressive means for querying OWL knowledge bases is still an open issue. In this paper, we investigate how a very natural and desirable form of queries-namely conjunctive ones-can be used in conjunction with OWL such that one of the major design criteria of the latter-namely decidability-can be retained. More precisely, we show that querying the tractable fragment EL ++ of OWL 1.1 is decidable. We also provide a complexity analysis and show that querying unrestricted EL ++ is undecidable.

References (14)

  1. Chandra, A.K., Merlin, P.M.: Optimal implementation of conjunctive queries in relational data bases. In Hopcroft, J.E., Friedman, E.P., Harrison, M.A., eds.: Proc. 9th annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'77), ACM Press (1977) 77-90
  2. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tessaris, S., Tobies, S.: How to decide query containment under constraints using a description logic. In Parigot, M., Voronkov, A., eds.: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Logic for Programming and Automated Reasoning (LPAR 2000). Volume 1955 of LNAI., Springer (2000) 326-343
  3. Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: A decomposition rule for decision procedures by resolution-based calculi. In: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (LPAR 2004). (2005) 21-35
  4. Ortiz, M.M., Calvanese, D., Eiter, T.: Data complexity of answering unions of conjunctive queries in SHIQ. In: Proc. 2006 Description Logic Workshop (DL 2006), CEUR Electronic Workshop Proceedings, http://ceur-ws.org/ (2006)
  5. Ortiz, M.M., Calvanese, D., Eiter, T.: Characterizing data complexity for conjunctive query answering in expressive description logics. In: Proc. 21st Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'06). (2006)
  6. Glimm, B., Horrocks, I., Lutz, C., Sattler, U.: Conjunctive query answering for the descrip- tion logic SHIQ. In: Proc. 21st Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-07), Hy- derabad, India (2007) Available at http://www.ijcai.org/papers07/contents.php.
  7. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the EL envelope. In: Proc. 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-05), Edinburgh, UK, Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers (2005)
  8. Krisnadhi, A., Lutz, C.: Data complexity in the EL family of DLs. In: Proc. DL 2007, CEUR Electronic Workshop Proceedings (2007)
  9. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Decidability of SHIQ with complex role inclusion axioms. In Gottlob, G., Walsh, T., eds.: Proc. 18th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), Acapulco, Mexico, Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers (2003) 343-348
  10. Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The even more irresistible SROIQ. In: Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2006), AAAI Press (2006) 57-67
  11. Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S.: Conjunctive queries for EL with role composition. Techni- cal report, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Germany (2007) Available at http://www.aifb. uni-karlsruhe.de/Publikationen/showPublikation?publ_id=1463.
  12. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Data complexity of query answering in description logics. In: Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006). (2006) 260-270
  13. Dantsin, E., Eiter, T., Gottlob, G., Voronkov, A.: Complexity and expressive power of logic programming. ACM Computing Surveys 33 (2001) 374-425
  14. Kozen, D.: Lower bounds for natural proof systems. In: Proc. 18th Symp. on the Foundations of Computer Science. (1977) 254-266