Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Geospatial Analysis and Living Urban Geometry

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8572-6_17

Abstract

This essay outlines how to incorporate morphological rules within the exigencies of our technological age. We propose using the current evolution of GIS (Geographical Information Systems) technologies beyond their original representational domain, towards predictive and dynamic spatial models that help in constructing the new discipline of “urban seeding”. We condemn the high rise tower block as an unsuitable typology for a living city, and propose to re-establish human-scale urban fabric that resembles the traditional city. Pedestrian presence, density, and movement all reveal that open space between modernist buildings is not urban at all, but neither is the open space found in today’s sprawling suburbs. True urban space contains and encourages pedestrian interactions, and has to be designed and built according to specific rules. The opposition between traditional self-organized versus modernist planned cities challenges the very core of the urban planning discipline. Planning has to be re-framed from being a tool creating a fixed future to become a visionary adaptive tool of dynamic states in evolution. Chapter in: Bin Jiang and Xiaobai Angela Yao, Editors, Geospatial Analysis and Modeling of Urban Structure and Dynamics, Springer, New York, 2009. A Portion of this essay was published in Italian as "Edilizia: piazza pulita delle archistar che hanno sinistrato le nostre città", Il Domenicale, Anno 8, Numero 13 (28 marzo 2009), page 3.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. Urban seeding redefines urban planning as an adaptive, participatory process for dynamic city evolution.
  2. GIS technologies enhance predictive modeling of urban dynamics and self-organization in spatial structures.
  3. Modernist planning has failed to create human-scale, livable urban environments, resulting in dead spaces.
  4. Traditional urban forms encourage social interactions and community, contrasting with sterile, isolated modernist designs.
  5. Successful urbanism integrates diverse functions and fosters pedestrian-friendly networks to support vibrant city life.

References (25)

  1. Christopher Alexander, S. Ishikawa, M. Silverstein, M. Jacobson, I. Fiksdahl-King & S. Angel (1977) A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press, New York, USA. Christopher Alexander, Hajo Neis, Artemis Anninou & Ingrid King (1987) A New Theory of Urban Design, Oxford University Press, New York, USA. Mike Batty (2002) "A decade of GIS: what next?", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Volume 29, pages 157-158.
  2. Mike Batty (2008) "Whither network science?", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Volume 35, pages 569-571.
  3. Mike Batty & Paul A. Longley (1994) Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function, Academic Press, London, UK.
  4. Cristoforo S. Bertuglia & Luca Staricco (2000) Complessità, Autoorganizzazione, Città, Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy (in Italian).
  5. Stefano Boccaletti, Vito Latora, Yamir Moreno, Martin Chavez & Dong-Uk Wang (2006) "Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics", Physics Reports, Volume 424, pages 175-308.
  6. Michele Campagna, editor (2005) GIS for Sustainable Development, CRC Press, London, UK. Gianfranco Caniggia & Gian Luigi Maffei (2001) Architectural Composition and Building Typology, Alinea Editrice, Florence, Italy. Steve Carver (2001) "Public participation using web-based GIS", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Volume 28, pages 803-804.
  7. Jean-Paul Donnay, Mike J. Barnsley & Paul A. Longley, editors (2001) Remote Sensing and Urban Analysis, Taylor and Francis, London, UK. Nickolas L. Faust (1995) "The virtual reality of GIS", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Volume 22, pages 257-268.
  8. Jan Gehl (1996) Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space, Arkitektens Forlag, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  9. Barbara Golicnik (2007) "GIS behavior mapping for provision of interactive empirical knowledge", in: Kevin Thwaites, Ombretta Romice, Sergio Porta & Micheal Greaves, editors (2007) Urban Sustainability Through Environmental Design: approaches to time, people and place responsive urban spaces, Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, UK, pages 136-140.
  10. Mark Granovetter (1973) "The strength of Weak Ties", American Journal of Sociology, Volume 78, pages 1360-1380.
  11. Rick Hall (2008) "Planning for Walkable Streets", Chapter 5.5 of: New Urbanism & Beyond: Designing Cities for the Future, Tigran Haas, Editor, Rizzoli, New York, pages 153-157.
  12. Alexander Harris (2008) "Complex Systems Theories for Understanding" <www.iaacblog.com/complexsystems/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/final-complex- systems.pdf>.
  13. Allan B. Jacobs, Elizabeth Macdonald & Yodan Rofè (2003) The Boulevard Book: History, Evolution, Design of Multiway Boulevards, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. Bin Jiang & Christophe Claramunt (2002) "Integration of space syntax into GIS: new perspectives for urban morphology", Transactions in GIS, Volume 6, pages 295-309.
  14. Stephen R. Kellert, Judith Heerwagen & Martin Mador, Editors (2008) Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, John Wiley, New York, USA. Léon Krier (1998) Architecture: Choice or Fate, Andreas Papadakis Publisher, Windsor, UK. Kevin Lynch (1981) A Theory of Good City Form, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  15. Nicola Marzot (2002) "The Study of Urban Form in Italy", Urban Morphology, Volume 6, Number 2, pages 59-73.
  16. Josep Oliva-i-Casas (2001) Confusion in Urban Design, Techne Press, Amsterdam, Holland. Sergio Porta (1999) "The Community and Public Spaces", Futures, Volume 31, pages 437-456.
  17. Sergio Porta (2008) "The World's Longest Mistake? Sustainable Urban Design and the Renovation of Social Housing Estates", Urban Scrawl, Issue 2, pages 18-21 <humanspacelab.com/UploadedFiles/PA2008_05.pdf>.
  18. Sergio Porta, Vito Latora & Paolo Crucitti (2006) "The network analysis of urban streets: a primal approach", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Volume 33, pages 705-725.
  19. Nikos A. Salingaros (2005) Principles of Urban Structure, Techne Press, Amsterdam, Holland.
  20. Nikos A. Salingaros, David Brain, Andrés M. Duany, Michael W. Mehaffy & Ernesto Philibert-Petit (2006) "Favelas and Social Housing: The Urbanism of Self-Organization", Presented at the Brazilian and Ibero-American Congress on Social Housing, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2006.
  21. Nikos A. Salingaros & Kenneth G. Masden II (2008) "Neuroscience, the Natural Environment, and Building Design", Chapter 5 of: Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life, edited by Stephen R. Kellert, Judith Heerwagen, and Martin Mador, John Wiley, New York, USA, pages 59-83.
  22. Hillel Schocken (2003) "Intimate Anonymity: Breaking the Code of the Urban Genome", INTBAU Essays, Volume 1, Number 5 <www.intbau.org/essay5.htm>. Senseable City Lab (2006) Real Time Rome, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge Massachusetts, USA. <http://senseable.mit.edu/realtimerome/>. Lucien Steil, Nikos A. Salingaros & Michael W. Mehaffy (2008) "Growing Sustainable Suburbs: An Incremental Strategy for Reconstructing Sprawl", Chapter 10.2 of: New Urbanism & Beyond: Designing Cities for the Future, Tigran Haas, Editor, Rizzoli, New York, USA, pages 262-274.
  23. Kevin Thwaites & Ian Simkins (2007) Experiential Landscape: An Approach to People, Place and Space, Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, UK.
  24. Daniel F. Wagner (1997) "Cellular automata and geographic information systems", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Volume 24, pages 219-234.
  25. William H. Whyte (1988) City: Rediscovering the Center, Doubleday, New York, USA.