Improving the design-construction interface
1998, … of the 6th Annual Meeting of the …
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
In building projects customer requirements, constructive aspects and quality standards are defined during the design phase. However, this important phase is usually carried out with little interaction between the construction and design teams causing many problems during construction such us: incomplete designs, change orders, rework, construction delays, etc.




Related papers
Despite the fact that there is a common sense in several published research about the importance of the design's contribution to quality improvement, the design concept itself has not been properly analyzed by many authors. Almost all these works present many factors related only to the building characteristics as a product, not as a complex process. This work discusses the potential contribution of design to quality and how it could be more effective, or rather how building design procedure must be organized and considered as a part of the project plan to achieve the best quality results. For this purpose, a casestudy is presented as a referential portrait. The clients satisfaction factors, involving mainly the needs of customers, construction companies and investors, are analyzed under a contemporary and systematic point of view. On the basis of this analysis, a proposal of guidelines will be briefly described in order to approximate the production and the design objectives, which will consequently change the design team arrangement and the design coordination and control methods.
Over the last years, in Brazil, no matter if pushed on by competitiveness or searching for certification, contractors have worked very hard on process standardisation and quality systems implementation. As a result, the request for design management has grown and architects and design engineers have been encouraged to change organisational models aiming to accomplish such new and large market requirements. This scenery allowed a new outlook into client-designer relationship, thus renewing the most usually adopted concepts and practices of the sector.
Frontiers in Engineering and Built Environment, 2021
PurposeQuality in the construction industry is an important issue yet ignored during the initial stages of the life cycle of a project, that is, the design and construction stage. The contribution of stakeholders, especially the architects is generally suspended though it has huge significance in terms of cost and time related to quality. This research endeavors to examine the issues related to the design and construction stages of the project from architects' purview, to understand the relative importance of these issues in the Indian construction industry.Design/methodology/approachThe study of qualitative data conducted formed a basis for online quantitative data collection that was further analyzed with the help of cross-tabulation and multiple correspondence analysis methods.FindingsThe study concludes that the budget of a project is a corresponding factor related to quality concern for architects. The study also established that the quality issues corresponding to high bud...
This paper explores and classifies current approaches to evaluating quality in design/build (DB) proposals. It does so by a thorough content analysis of 78 requests for proposal (RFPs) for public DB projects with an aggregate contract value of over $3.0 billion advertised between 1997 and 2002. In most DB projects, the owner requires the DB contractor to establish a firm-fixed price on a project that has not yet been designed. Usually, the owner also fixes the project delivery period. In the traditional design/bid/build (DBB) system, quality is fixed through the plans and specifications. Thus, in DBB, with schedule and quality fixed, the cost of construction is the factor in which the owner seeks competition. Conversely, in DB, with cost and schedule fixed, the scope and hence the level of quality is the main element of competition. This paper identifies the six owner approaches to articulating DB quality specified program, performance criteria, specification, and warranty. These are important for DB contractors to understand so that they can craft their proposal in a manner that is both responsive to the owners’ requirements and consistent with the owner’s system to make the best value contract award decision. CE Database subject headings: Design/build; Quality control; Construction industry; Highway construction.
The quality of design and documentation has a major influence on the overall performance and efficiency of construction projects. As designers provide the graphic and written representations which allow contractors and subcontractors to transform concepts and ideas into physical reality, it is the efficiency with which this transformation occurs that determines the level of project performance and efficiency achieved.
"Design Management is an increasingly important function in the construction industry. Design management is being done by construction companies because of the failure of other existing systems to achieve proper integration of the design and construction processes. Initial results from a three-year empirical study of the practice of design management in an international construction company have been compared to conceptions devised from literature in order to describe the design management practices. This is being done in order to provide a foundation, which can be used to generate better co-ordinated design and construction in complex one-off engineering projects. Three conceptions of design management: design management as “integrators of design and construction”; design management as “managers”; and design management as “meta designers” were devised from literature and compared to several case studies conducted on a variety of projects. Early results indicate that during the operational stages of a project design management in the company can be better conceived as “meta designers” rather than as “managers”. The design management personnel were responsible for designing a system, which made stakeholders the co-developers or co-designers; they did tasks that designers are responsible for in smaller projects, but which inevitably get lost in larger projects; and they dealt with issues arising from the integration of design and construction."
This paper explores and classifies current approaches to evaluating quality in design/build (DB) proposals. It does so by a thorough content analysis of 78 requests for proposal (RFPs) for public DB projects with an aggregate contract value of over $3.0 billion advertised between 1997 and 2002. In most DB projects, the owner requires the DB contractor to establish a firm-fixed price on a project that has not yet been designed. Usually, the owner also fixes the project delivery period. In the traditional design/bid/build (DBB) system, quality is fixed through the plans and specifications. Thus, in DBB, with schedule and quality fixed, the cost of construction is the factor in which the owner seeks competition. Conversely, in DB, with cost and schedule fixed, the scope and hence the level of quality is the main element of competition. This paper identifies the six owner approaches to articulating DB quality requirements in their RFPs. The six approaches are quality by qualifications, evaluated program, specified program, performance criteria, specification, and warranty. These are important for DB contractors to understand so that they can craft their proposal in a manner that is both responsive to the owners' requirements and consistent with the owner's system to make the best value contract award decision.
2002
The design model, hitherto adopted by building companies, is sequential, lacks coordination and, most of the time is disengaged from the production process. It is now undergoing reformulation because of the intense concern with quality in this sector. Building companies are beginning to admit the importance of the production chain, with design acting as an element which preempts problems on the building site. The design process management assumes large importance in lean construction: adopting constructability principles; minimizing waste and reducing time. In this field of action, the design for production has been put to use by building companies to improve the production process, since it holds the necessary elements. Inserted in the design process, it seeks to support continuous improvement on building sites. The present work intends to evaluate the importance of the design for production in the design process management, checking its validation while being a support element to ...
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2011
PurposeAs the construction industry strives for closer integration of the participants, more responsibility for the management of the detailed design process is being directed to main contractors and combined with their existing duties of managing the construction and pre‐construction processes. Crucially, this necessitates successful management of the interface between these processes, and this paper seeks to investigate a conceptual view of that interface to provide a foundation for improving understanding of it.Design/methodology/approachRecent and current literature is examined, and various theoretical backgrounds for the design and the construction processes are reviewed. The consequences for the understanding of the interface are discussed. The significance of conceptual frameworks is also reviewed.FindingsA significant difference is identified in the published work between the theoretical understandings of the construction and design processes. From this a conceptual framewor...

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
References (5)
- Alarcón, L.F. (1994). "Lean Construction, the Application of the New Production Philosophy in Construction." In Spanish: "Construcción sin Pérdidas, la Aplicación de Nuevas Filosofías de Producción en la Construcción." Boletín de Información Tecnológica, 1 (2) 42-46, Santiago de Chile, November.
- Figari, C. (1996). A Diagnosis of Quality in the Chilean Construction Industry. In Spanish: Diagnóstico de la Calidad en la Construcción Chilena. M.S. Thesis, Dept. of Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago,Chile.
- Huovila, P., Koskela, L., and Lautanala, M. (1997). "Fast or Concurrent: The Art of Getting Construction Improved." in Lean Construction, Alarcón, L.F. (editor), A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 143-159.
- Mardones, D. (1997). Evaluation of the Design-Construction Interface in Building Projects, Recommendations for Design Quality Assurance. In Spanish: Evaluación de la Interfase Diseño Construcción en Obras de Edificación: Recomendaciones para Asegurar la Calidad de los Diseños. M.S. Thesis, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Universidad de Chile.
- Undurraga, M. (1996). "Construction Productivity and Housing Financing." In Spanish: "La Productividad en la Construcción y Financiamiento de Vivienda." Seminar and Workshop Interamerican Housing Union, Ciudad de México, D.F., México, 28-29 October.