Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

A Scalable Collaborative Filtering Based

Abstract

Recommender systems help to overcome the organized as follows. Section II provides a brief overview of problem of information overload on the Internet by providing collaborative filtering. In Section III, we present related works.

References (22)

  1. J Breese, D Hecherman, C Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference performance of the system under dynamic situation i.e. when on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco :Morgan Kaufmann, more and more users are entered into the system after initial pp. 43-52, 1998. clustering we have varied the ratio of no of base users to no of [2] Choochart Haruechaiyasak, Chatchawal Tipnoe, Sarawoot Kongyoung, incremental users and calculated the MAE in each case. The Chaianun Damrongrat, Niran Angkawattanawit, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service result of our experiment has been shown in Table 2 and (EEE'05),pp. 768-771,2005.
  2. D. Billsus and M. Pazzani, "A Personal News Agent that Talks, Learns as well as item clusters is taken as 10 and results are and Explains", Third Intern. Conf on Autonomous Agents (Agents '99), calculated for neighborhood size 30 and 40 respectively. The Seattle, Washington, 1999.
  3. Fabrizio Sebastiani, Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization, MAE calculated for the situation when all users were added to ACM Computing Surveys, 34(l),ppl-47, 2002. the system before initial clustering (100/0) is compared with
  4. J. Herlocker, J. Konstan, L. Terveen, and J. Riedl. Evaluating three dynamic situations with Base/Incremental user ratio Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. ACM Transactions on 80/20, 60/40 and 30/70 respectively. Information Systems, pp.5-53, ACM Press,2004.
  5. Khanh Quan Truong, Ishikawa Fuyuki and Honiden Shinichi, Improving Accuracy of Recommender System by Clustering Items Based on Stability of No of User Clusters=10 User Similarity, International Conference on Computational Intelligence for No of Item Clusters=10 Modelling Control and Automation,and International Conference on Base User/ Neighborhood Neighborhood Intelligent Agents,Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA- Incr. User Size=30 Size=40 IAWTIC'06),2006
  6. M. Pazzani, J. Muramatsu, D. Billsus, "Syskil & Webert: Identifying
  7. Interesting Web Sites", AAAI-96, pp.54-61, 1996.
  8. M. Pazzani, J. Muramatsu, D. Billsus, "Syskil & Webert: Identifying Interesting Web Sites", AAAI-96, pp.54-61, 1996.
  9. Partha Sarathi chakraborty, A Multi-Clustering Recommender System 30/70
  10. Using Collaborative Filtering, Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Sciences(ICWS 2009), 2009.
  11. Table 2 -Result of comparison between three dynamic
  12. P. Resnick and H. R. Varian. Recommender systems. Special issue of situation and the situation when all users were added to the Communications of the ACM,pp.56-58, March 1997. system before initial clustering
  13. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.1994. GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Work Conference. Chapel Hill, NC.,1994.
  14. R. J. Mooney, L. Roy, "Content-Based Book Recommend-ingUsing Learning for Text Categorization", Fifth ACM Conf. on Digital Libraries, 2000.
  15. Sarwar, B.M., Karypis, G., Konstan, J.A. and Riedl, J. 2000a. Application of Dimensionality Reduction in Recommender System -A Case Study. In ACM WebKDD 2000 Web Mining for E-commerce Workshop,2000. 1528 2009 IEEE Internactionalz Advance Computing Conference (IACC 2009)j
  16. B Sarwar, G Karypis, J Ried. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th international World Wide Web conference,pp.285-295,2001.
  17. Schafer B., Konstan J., Riedl J., Recommender Systems in E-Commerce. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 1999.
  18. Shardanand, U. and Maes, P. Social Information Filtering: Algorithms for Automating "Word of Mouth". In Proceedings of CHI., Denver, CO pp. 210- 217,1995.
  19. Wujian Yang, Zebing Waug and Mingyu You, An improved Collaborative Filtering Method for Recommendiations' Generation, In Proceedings of IEEE International Conierence on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,2004
  20. Feng Zhang, Hui-you Chang, A Collaborative Filtering Algorithm Employing Genetic Clustering to Ameliorate the Scalability Issue, In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE'06),2006
  21. Liang Zhang, Bo Xiao, Jun Guo, Chen Zhu, A Scalable Collaborative Filtering Algorithm Based On Localized Preference, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Kunming, 2008
  22. T. M. Cover. Rates of convergence for nearest neighbor procedures, Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 413- 415, Hawaii,1968. 2009 IEEE Inxternational Advanxce Computing Conference (IACC 2009)j