Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Towards player-driven procedural content generation

2012, Proceedings of the 9th …

https://doi.org/10.1007/S11257-010-9078-0

Abstract

Generating immersive game content is one of the ultimate goals for a game designer. This goal can be achieved by realizing the fact that players' perception of the same game differ according to a number of factors including: players' personality, playing styles, expertise and culture background. While one player might find the game immersive, others may quit playing as a result of encountering a seemingly insoluble problem. One promising avenue towards optimizing the gameplay experience for individual game players is to tailor player experience in real-time via automatic game content generation. Specifying the aspects of the game that have the major influence on the gameplay experience, identifying the relationship between these aspect and each individual experience and defining a mechanism for tailoring the game content according to each individual needs are important steps towards player-driven content generation.

References (26)

  1. REFERENCES
  2. G. Andrade, G. Ramalho, H. Santana, and V. Corruble. Automatic computer game balancing: a reinforcement learning approach. In Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS, pages 1111-1112. ACM, 2005.
  3. D. Charles and M. Black. Dynamic player modeling: A framework for player-centered digital games. In Proc. of the International Conference on Computer Games: Artificial Intelligence, Design and Education, pages 29-35, 2004.
  4. M. Csikszentmihalyi. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. Jossey-Bass, 25th anniversary edition, 2000.
  5. E. Hudlicka. Affective computing for game design. In GAMEON-NA'08: Proceedings of the 4th Intl. North American Conference on Intelligent Games and Simulation, pages 5-12, Montreal, Canada, 2008.
  6. S. Kazmi and I. Palmer. Action recognition for support of adaptive gameplay: A case study of a first person shooter. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2010:1, 2010.
  7. I. Leite, A. Pereira, S. Mascarenhas, G. Castellano, C. Martinho, R. Prada, and A. Paiva. Closing the loop: from affect recognition to empathic interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Affective interaction in natural environments, AFFINE, pages 43-48. ACM, 2010.
  8. T. Malone. What makes computer games fun? (abstract only). In Proceedings of the joint conference on Easier and more productive use of computer systems. (Part -II): Human interface and the user interface -Volume 1981, CHI '81, pages 143-. ACM, 1981.
  9. O. Missura and T. Gartner. Player Modeling for Intelligent Difficulty Adjustment. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Discovery Science, DS '09, pages 197-211. Springer-Verlag, 2009.
  10. C. Pedersen, J. Togelius, and G. N. Yannakakis. Modeling player experience for content creation. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 2(1):54-67, 2010.
  11. R. W. Picard. Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1997.
  12. N. Shaker, S. Asteriadis, G. Yannakakis, and K. Karpouzis. A game-based corpus for analysing the interplay between game context and player experience. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pages 547-556, 2011.
  13. N. Shaker, J. Togelius, G. N. Yannakakis, B. Weber, T. Shimizu, T. Hashiyama, N. Sorenson, P. Pasquier, P. Mawhorter, G. Takahashi, G. Smith, and R. Baumgarten. The 2010 Mario AI championship: Level generation track. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and Games, 2011.
  14. N. Shaker, G. Yannakakis, and J. Togelius. Digging deeper into platform game level design: session size and sequential features. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Applications of Evolutionary Computation (EvoApplications). Springer LNCS, 2012.
  15. N. Shaker, G. N. Yannakakis, and J. Togelius. Towards Automatic Personalized Content Generation for Platform Games. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE). AAAI Press, 2010.
  16. N. Shaker, G. N. Yannakakis, and J. Togelius. Feature Analysis for Modeling Game Content Quality. In IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games (CIG), 2011.
  17. R. Srikant and R. Agrawal. Mining sequential patterns: Generalizations and performance improvements. pages 3-17, 1996.
  18. K. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary computation, pages 99-127, 2002.
  19. J. Togelius, R. De Nardi, and S. Lucas. Towards automatic personalised content creation for racing games. In Computational Intelligence and Games, 2007. CIG 2007. IEEE Symposium on, pages 252-259. IEEE, 2007.
  20. J. Togelius, G. N. Yannakakis, K. O. Stanley, and C. Browne. Search-based procedural content generation. In Proceedings of EvoApplications, volume 6024. Springer LNCS, 2010.
  21. G. Yannakakis and J. Hallam. Real-time Game Adaptation for Optimizing Player Satisfaction. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 1(2):121-133, June 2009.
  22. G. Yannakakis, H. Lund, and J. Hallam. Modeling children's entertainment in the playware playground. In IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games, pages 134-141. IEEE, 2006.
  23. G. N. Yannakakis, M. Maragoudakis, and J. Hallam. Preference learning for cognitive modeling: a case study on entertainment preferences. Trans. Sys. Man Cyber. Part A, 39:1165-1175, November 2009.
  24. G. N. Yannakakis, H. P. Martnez, and A. Jhala. Towards affective camera control in games. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 20:313-340, 2010. 10.1007/s11257-010-9078-0.
  25. G. N. Yannakakis and J. Togelius. Experience-Driven Procedural Content Generation. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2011.
  26. M. J. Zaki. Spade: An efficient algorithm for mining frequent sequences. Mach. Learn., 42:31-60, January 2001.