Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

DESIGN VS. RE-DESIGN AND HOW TO INNOVATE

Abstract

Responsive to the challenges of modern times, designers and educators see the need to re-examine their role and responsibility. Several of them adopted human-centered approaches that make the user and the process of interacting and experiencing products their primary focus. To sustain these approaches requires extended theoretical knowledge and a sensibility for complex phenomenon such as human cognitive processes, user behavior and attitudes. Therefore, some schools added courses such as material cultures, eco-design, sociology, anthropology or cognitive psychology to their repertoire. Nonetheless, concerns are being raised about students’ ability to assimilate and apply these notions. Others question if human-centered design really produce significantly different results and if traditional teaching methods are still valid. A design studio has been dedicated to examine these questions and let students compare an object-focused design approach with a human centered approach in which the user and the contextual environment play a central role. The studio not only lets students explore advantages and limits of both approaches and scrutinize the pertinence of their results, it also allows educators to assess the assimilation of theoretical knowledge. The paper describes the experimental setup of the studio as well as its outcome, and stresses the need for raising awareness of how results can vary depending on how problems are being approached. The observations made during the studio contribute to the discussion on changing design practices, which support more than redesign, suggesting context-sensitive design approaches that rather promote design and innovation

References (8)

  1. Caron A.H. and Caronia L. Moving Cultures, Mobil Communication in Everyday Life, 2007 (McGill-Queen's University Press, Canada).
  2. Cumulus, International Association of Universities and Colleges of Art, Design and Media, Kyoto Design declaration 2008, www.cumulusassociation.org
  3. Sanders E. From User-Centered to Participatory Design Approaches. In Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections, 2002, (edited by J. Frascara, Taylor & Francis Inc.)
  4. Sanders, E. How applied ethnography can improve your NPD research process. In Visions, 2002, http://www.pdma.org/visions/apr02/applied.html
  5. Carroll J. Ed. Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology system development. 1995, (New York, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York).
  6. Buchenau M. and Suri J. F. Experience Prototyping. In: Proceedings of DIS00: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, 2000, ACM Press, 424 -433.
  7. Michl J. On Seeing Design as Redesign. An Exploration of a Neglected Problem in Design Education. Scandinavian Journal of Design History, 2002, (12): 7-23, Oslo School of Architecture, Norway, www.designaddict.com/essais/michl.html
  8. Leblanc T. Evolved Design Thinking and the Impact on Education and Practice. In New Perspectives in Design Education, E&PDE 2008, V 1, Barcelona, September 2008, pp. 547-552, (editors Clark A. et al, publisher Artyplan Global Printers Ltd. Spain).