Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

DisProt: the Database of Disordered Proteins

2007, Nucleic Acids Research

https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKL893

Abstract

The Database of Protein Disorder (DisProt) links structure and function information for intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). Intrinsically disordered proteins do not form a fixed three-dimensional structure under physiological conditions, either in their entireties or in segments or regions. We define IDP as a protein that contains at least one experimentally determined disordered region. Although lacking fixed structure, IDPs and regions carry out important biological functions, being typically involved in regulation, signaling and control. Such functions can involve high-specificity low-affinity interactions, the multiple binding of one protein to many partners and the multiple binding of many proteins to one partner. These three features are all enabled and enhanced by protein intrinsic disorder. One of the major hindrances in the study of IDPs has been the lack of organized information. DisProt was developed to enable IDP research by collecting and organizing knowledge regarding the experimental characterization and the functional associations of IDPs. In addition to being a unique source of biological information, DisProt opens doors for a plethora of bioinformatics studies. DisProt is openly available at

References (40)

  1. Fischer,E. (1894) Einfluss der configuration auf die wirkung derenzyme. Ber. Dt. Chem. Ges., 27, 2985-2993.
  2. Koshland,D.E., Jr, Ray,W.J., Jr and Erwin,M.J. (1958) Protein structure and enzyme action. Fed. Proc., 17, 1145-1150.
  3. Xie,L. and Bourne,P.E. (2005) Functional coverage of the human genome by existing structures, structural genomics targets, and homology models. PLoS. Comput. Biol., 1, e31.
  4. Landsteiner,D.P. (1936) The Specificity of Serological Reactions. Dover, New York.
  5. Pauling,L. (1940) A theory of the structure and process of formation of antibodies. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 62, 2643-2657.
  6. Karush,F. (1950) Heterogeneity of the binding sites of bovine serum albumin. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 72, 2705-2713.
  7. Armstrong,C.M. and Bezanilla,F. (1972) Inactivation of the sodium channel: II. Gating current experiments. J. Gen. Physiol., 70, 567-590.
  8. Schulz,G.E. (1979) Nucleotide binding proteins. In Balaban,M. (ed.), Molecular Mechanisms of Biological Recognition. Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, New York, pp. 79-94.
  9. Holt,C. and Sawyer,L. (1993) Caseins as rheomorphic proteins: interpretation of primary and secondary structures of the alphaS1-, beta-and kappa-caseins. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 89, 2683-2692.
  10. Weinreb,P.H., Zhen,W., Poon,A.W., Conway,K.A. and Lansbury,P.T., Jr (1996) NACP, a protein implicated in Alzheimer's disease and learning, is natively unfolded. Biochemistry, 35, 13709-13715.
  11. Wright,P.E. and Dyson,H.J. (1999) Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J. Mol. Biol., 293, 321-331.
  12. Dunker,A.K., Brown,C.J., Lawson,J.D., Iakoucheva,L.M. and Obradovic,Z. (2002) Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry, 41, 6573-6582.
  13. Ruzza,P., Donella-Deana,A., Calderan,A., Filippi,B., Cesaro,L., Pinna,L.A. and Borin,G. (1996) An exploration of the effects of constraints on the phosphorylation of synthetic protein tyrosine kinase peptide substrates. J. Pept. Sci., 2, 325-338.
  14. Dunten,R.L. and Cohen,R.E. (1989) Recognition of modified forms of ribonuclease A by the ubiquitin system. J. Biol. Chem., 264, 16739-16747.
  15. Cox,C.J., Dutta,K., Petri,E.T., Hwang,W.C., Lin,Y., Pascal,S.M. and Basavappa,R. (2002) The regions of securin and cyclin B proteins recognized by the ubiquitination machinery are natively unfolded. FEBS Lett., 527, 303-308.
  16. Yoshida,Y., Adachi,E., Fukiya,K., Iwai,K. and Tanaka,K. (2005) Glycoprotein-specific ubiquitin ligases recognize N-glycans in unfolded substrates. EMBO Rep., 6, 239-244.
  17. Pawson,T. and Scott,J.D. (1997) Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. Science, 278, 2075-2080.
  18. Kuriyan,J. and Cowburn,D. (1997) Modular peptide recognition domains in eukaryotic signaling. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 26, 259-288.
  19. Yaffe,M.B. (2002) Phosphotyrosine-binding domains in signal transduction. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3, 177-186.
  20. Puntervoll,P., Linding,R., Gemund,C., Chabanis-Davidson,S., Mattingsdal,M., Cameron,S., Martin,D.M., Ausiello,G., Brannetti,B., Costantini,A. et al. (2003) ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3625-3630.
  21. Neduva,V. and Russell,R.B. (2005) Linear motifs: evolutionary interaction switches. FEBS Lett., 579, 3342-3345.
  22. Spolar,R.S. and Record,M.T., Jr (1994) Coupling of local folding to site-specific binding of proteins to DNA. Science, 263, 777-784.
  23. Kriwacki,R.W., Hengst,L., Tennant,L., Reed,S.I. and Wright,P.E. (1996) Structural studies of p21Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1 in the free and Cdk2-bound state: conformational disorder mediates binding diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 11504-11509.
  24. Bustos,D.M. and Iglesias,A.A. (2006) Intrinsic disorder is a key characteristic in partners that bind 14-3-3 proteins. Proteins, 63, 35-42.
  25. Dunker,A.K. and Obradovic,Z. (2001) The protein trinity-linking function and disorder. Nat. Biotechnol., 19, 805-806.
  26. Uversky,V.N. (2002) Natively unfolded proteins: a point where biology waits for physics. Protein Sci., 11, 739-756.
  27. Romero,P.R., Zaidi,S., Fang,Y.Y., Uversky,V.N., Radivojac,P., Oldfield,C.J., Cortese,M.S., Sickmeier,M., LeGall,T., Obradovic,Z. et al. (2006) Alternative splicing in concert with protein intrinsic disorder enables increased functional diversity in multicellular organisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 8390-8395.
  28. Jin,Y. and Dunbrack,R.L., Jr (2005) Assessment of disorder predictions in CASP6. Proteins, 61 (Suppl. 7), 167-175.
  29. Wang,G., Jin,Y. and Dunbrack,R.L., Jr (2005) Assessment of fold recognition predictions in CASP6. Proteins, 61 (Suppl. 7), 46-66.
  30. Tompa,P. (2002) Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci., 27, 527-533.
  31. Mohan,A., Oldfield,C.J., Radivojac,P., Vacic,V., Cortese,M.S., Dunker,A.K. and Uversky,V.N. (2006) Analysis of Molecular Recognition Features (MoRFs). J. Mol. Biol., 362, 1043-1059.
  32. Gunasekaran,K., Tsai,C.J. and Nussinov,R. (2004) Analysis of ordered and disordered protein complexes reveals structural features discriminating between stable and unstable monomers. J. Mol. Biol., 341, 1327-1341.
  33. Khan,A.N. and Lewis,P.N. (2005) Unstructured conformations are a substrate requirement for the Sir2 family of NAD-dependent protein deacetylases. J. Biol. Chem., 280, 36073-36078.
  34. Beltrao,P. and Serrano,L. (2005) Comparative genomics and disorder prediction identify biologically relevant SH3 protein interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol., 1, e26.
  35. D792 Nucleic Acids Research, 2007, Vol. 35, Database issue 35. Fuxreiter,M., Simon,I., Friedrich,P. and Tompa,P. (2004) Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 338, 1015-1026.
  36. Obenauer,J.C., Cantley,L.C. and Yaffe,M.B. (2003) Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3635-3641.
  37. Rost,B. and Liu,J. (2003) The PredictProtein server. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3300-3304.
  38. Rost,B., Yachdav,G. and Liu,J. (2004) The PredictProtein server. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, W321-W326.
  39. Ferron,F., Longhi,S., Canard,B. and Karlin,D. (2006) A practical overview of protein disorder prediction methods. Proteins, 65, 1-14.
  40. Weathers,E.A., Paulaitis,M.E., Woolf,T.B. and Hoh,J.H. (2006) Insights into protein structure and function from disorder-complexity space. Proteins, 65, in press.