Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Experimental Setup
Analytical Methods
Conclusions
References
All Topics
Earth Sciences

pH-dependent reactive transport of uranium(VI) in unsaturated sand

Profile image of Burcu UyusurBurcu Uyusur

2014, Journal of Soils and Sediments

https://doi.org/10.1007/S11368-014-1018-X
visibility

…

description

14 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Purpose Uranium contamination of subsurface environments was once thought to be an isolated occurrence, mostly at production sites. But recent evidence has shown that the presence of uranium in phosphate fertilizers has caused massive amounts of this element to be released worldwide. Concerns are related to uranium movement to groundwater supplies and its significant toxicological risks to human populations. Information is direly needed on how geochemical processes control uranium transport in the vadose zone. Materials and methods Laboratory experiments were performed to investigate the effects of the pH of the soil solution on the reactive transport of uranium(VI) in the vadose zone. The uranium solution was prepared by dilution of a 10 −3 M stock solution of uranium perchlorate, (UO 2 (ClO 4 ) 2 ), with DI water. Two U(VI) solutions were prepared at concentrations of 2×10 −6 M at pH 6 and 11 and were percolated under steady-state conditions through columns filled with sand. The convective-dispersion equation (CDE) was used to analyze the tracer and uranium breakthrough curves resulting from the column experiments. The program CXTFIT was used to estimate the transport parameters of equilibrium and nonequilibrium (i.e., two-site and mobile-immobile) models applied to the experimental data. Results and discussion Comparison of U(VI) breakthrough behavior at pH 6 with that of a nonreactive tracer indicated that U(VI) transport was significantly retarded, and about 52 % of the added U(VI) adsorbed to the quartz sand, likely in the cationic forms UO 2 OH + and UO 2 2 + . The adsorption was reversible upon the addition of deionized water. At pH 11, the U(VI) breakthrough curve increased gradually and reached a plateau value C/C 0 oscillating between 72 and 82 %. Upon reaction, Si was released from the dissolution of quartz sand, which allowed the possible transport of U(VI) following precipitation of a U(VI) containing solid, such as uranyl-silicate minerals, or sorption of U(VI) onto silica colloids. Twosite and mobile-immobile (MIM) models suggested an influence of either rate-limited mass transfer processes or immobile/mobile water partitioning in U(VI) reactive transport.

Related papers

Study of Sorption-Retarded U(VI) Diffusion in Hanford Silt/Clay Material
William Ball

Environmental Science & Technology, 2009

A diffusion cell method was applied to measure the effective pore diffusion coefficient (D p ) for U(VI) under strictly controlled chemical conditions in a silt/clay sediment from the U.S. Department of Energy Hanford site, WA. "Inward-flux" diffusion studies were conducted in which [U(VI)] in both aqueous and solid phases was measured as a function of distance in the diffusion cell under conditions of constant concentration at the cell boundaries. A sequential extraction method was developed to measure sorbed contaminant U(VI) in the solid phase containing extractable background U(VI). The effect of sorption kinetics on U(VI) interparticle diffusion was evaluated by comparing sorption-retarded diffusion models with sorption described either as equilibrium or intraparticle diffusion-limited processes. Both experimental and modeling results indicated that (1) a single pore diffusion coefficient can simulate the diffusion of total aqueous U(VI), and (2) the local equilibrium assumption (LEA) is appropriate for modeling sorption-retarded diffusion under the given experimental conditions. D p of 1.6-1.7 × 10 -6 cm 2 /s was estimated in aqueous solution at pH 8.0 and saturated with respect to calcite, as relevant to some subsurface regions of the Hanford site.

View PDFchevron_right
Interactions of aqueous U(VI) with soil minerals in slightly alkaline natural systems
Nikolla Qafoku

Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2008

Uranium (U) is a common contaminant at numerous surface and subsurface sites in proximity to areas involved with weapons manufacturing and atomic energy related activities. This paper covers some important aspects of the aqueous hexavalent uranium [U(VI)] interactions with soil minerals that are present in contaminated soils and sediments. The retention of U via interactions with soil minerals has significant consequences for the prediction of its short-and long-term behavior in soils and geological systems. Studies of the nature and type of these interactions have provided the necessary evidence for assessing the geochemical behavior of U in natural systems under different physical, biogeochemical, hydrological, and reducing or oxidizing conditions. Over the last 20 years, aqueous U(VI): soil mineral interactions have been studied by geochemists, soil chemists, clay and soil mineralogists, and the progress in some areas is remarkable. Although a mechanistic description and understanding of the complex interactions involving U and soil minerals in natural systems is currently difficult, results from carefully designed and executed field and laboratory experiments with these materials have improved our understanding of the heterogeneous system's behavior and U contaminant mobility and transport. There are, however, areas that warrant further exploration and study. Numerous research publications were reviewed in this paper to present recent important findings to reveal the current level of the understanding of the U(VI) interactions with soil minerals, and to provide ideas for future needs and research directions.

View PDFchevron_right
Transport of U(VI) through sediments amended with phosphate to induce in situ uranium immobilization
Zheming Wang

Water Research, 2015

In situ immobilization Reactive transport Sequential extractions CXTFIT a b s t r a c t Phosphate amendments can be added to U(VI)-contaminated subsurface environments to promote in situ remediation. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of phosphate addition on the transport of U(VI) through contaminated sediments. In batch experiments using sediments (<2 mm size fraction) from a site in Rifle, Colorado, U(VI) only weakly adsorbed due to the dominance of the aqueous speciation by CaeU(VI)carbonate complexes. Column experiments with these sediments were performed with flow rates that correspond to a groundwater velocity of 1.1 m/day. In the absence of phosphate, the sediments took up 1.68e1.98 mg U/g of sediments when the synthetic groundwater influent contained 4 mM U(VI). When U(VI)-free influents were then introduced with and without phosphate, substantially more uranium was retained within the column when phosphate was present in the influent. Sequential extractions of sediments from the columns revealed that uranium was uniformly distributed along the length of the columns and was primarily in forms that could be extracted by ion exchange and contact with a weak acid. Laser induced fluorescence spectroscopy (LIFS) analysis along with sequential extraction results suggest adsorption as the dominant uranium uptake mechanism. The response of dissolved uranium concentrations to stopped-flow events and the comparison of experimental data with simulations from a simple reactive transport model indicated that uranium adsorption to and desorption from the sediments was not always at local equilibrium. ScienceDirect j ou rnal h ome pag e: www.elsevier.com/loca te/watres w a t e r r e s e a r c h 6 9 ( 2 0 1 5 ) 3 0 7 e3 1 7 http://dx.

View PDFchevron_right
Geochemical Control on Uranium(IV) Mobility in a Mining-Impacted Wetland
Yuheng Wang, Rizlan Bernier-latmani

Environmental Science & Technology, 2014

Wetlands often act as sinks for uranium and other trace elements. Our previous work at a mining-impacted wetland in France showed that a labile noncrystalline U(IV) species consisting of U(IV) bound to Al−P−Fe−Si aggregates was predominant in the soil at locations exhibiting a Ucontaining clay-rich layer within the top 30 cm. Additionally, in the porewater, the association of U(IV) with Fe(II) and organic matter colloids significantly increased U(IV) mobility in the wetland. In the present study, within the same wetland, we further demonstrate that the speciation of U at a location not impacted by the clay-rich layer is a different noncrystalline U(IV) species, consisting of U(IV) bound to organic matter in soil. We also show that the clay-poor location includes an abundant sulfate supply and active microbial sulfate reduction that induce substantial pyrite (FeS 2 ) precipitation. As a result, Fe(II) concentrations in the porewater are much lower than those at clay-impacted zones. U porewater concentrations (0.02−0.26 μM) are also considerably lower than those at the clay-impacted locations (0.21−3.4 μM) resulting in minimal U mobility. In both cases, soil-associated U represents more than 99% of U in the wetland. We conclude that the low U mobility reported at clay-poor locations is due to the limited association of Fe(II) with organic matter colloids in porewater and/or higher stability of the noncrystalline U(IV) species in soil at those locations.

View PDFchevron_right
Equilibrium isotherm and kinetics modeling of U(VI) adsorption by natural soil systems
Dr. Sabyasachi Rout

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2014

This research examined the adsorption capability of natural soils of different origin for U(VI) at soilwater interface and the mechanism involved. Adsorption kinetics study indicates that adsorption followed the pseudo-second order kinetics irrespective of soil types and was not solely controlled by the diffusion step rather surface complexation and ion-exchange plays major role. Study of adsorption isotherms indicates adsorption involves chemisorption and soil with high Fe and Mn content better fit to Langmuir model. The study provides a better insight for site selection for radioactive waste (uranium) disposal facilities as well as soil suitable for back fill or permeable reactive barrier to inhibit migration of U(VI).

View PDFchevron_right
Uranium diffusion and time‐dependent adsorption–desorption in soil: a model and experimental testing of the model
Andrea Boghi

European Journal of Soil Science

Highlights  We developed a model of U diffusion and reaction in soil on scales relevant to uptake by plant roots.  We tested the model against measured diffusion profiles and obtained excellent agreement.  The kinetics of U adsorption-desorption reactions are important.  Reaction kinetics measured in shaken suspensions or flow-through systems are likely to be misleading.

View PDFchevron_right
Influence of acidic and alkaline waste solution properties on uranium migration in subsurface sediments
Nikolla Qafoku

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2013

This study shows that acidic and alkaline wastes co-disposed with uranium into subsurface sediments have significant impact on changes in uranium retardation, concentration, and mass during downward migration. For uranium co-disposal with acidic wastes, significant rapid (i.e., hours) carbonate and slow (i.e., 100 s of hours) clay dissolution resulted, releasing significant sediment-associated uranium, but the extent of uranium release and mobility change was controlled by the acid mass added relative to the sediment proton adsorption capacity. Mineral dissolution in acidic solutions (pH 2) resulted in a rapid (b 10 h) increase in aqueous carbonate (with Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ ) and phosphate and a slow (100 s of hours) increase in silica, Al 3+ , and K + , likely from 2:1 clay dissolution. Infiltration of uranium with a strong acid resulted in significant shallow uranium mineral dissolution and deeper uranium precipitation (likely as phosphates and carbonates) with downward uranium migration of three times greater mass at a faster velocity relative to uranium infiltration in pH neutral groundwater. In contrast, mineral dissolution in an alkaline environment (pH 13) resulted in a rapid (b10 h) increase in carbonate, followed by a slow (10 s to 100 s of hours) increase in silica concentration, likely from montmorillonite, muscovite, and kaolinite dissolution. Infiltration of uranium with a strong base resulted in not only uranium-silicate precipitation (presumed Na-boltwoodite) but also desorption of natural uranium on the sediment due to the high ionic strength solution, or 60% greater mass with greater retardation compared with groundwater. Overall, these results show that acidic or alkaline co-contaminant disposal with uranium can result in complex depth-and time-dependent changes in uranium dissolution/precipitation reactions and uranium sorption, which alter the uranium migration mass, concentration, and velocity.

View PDFchevron_right
Modeling uranium transport in acidic contaminated groundwater with base addition
Scott Brooks

Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011

This study investigates reactive transport modeling in a column of uranium(VI)-contaminated sediments with base additions in the circulating influent. The groundwater and sediment exhibit oxic conditions with low pH, high concentrations of NO 3 − , SO 4 2− , U and various metal cations. Preliminary batch experiments indicate that additions of strong base induce rapid immobilization of U for this material. In the column experiment that is the focus of the present study, effluent groundwater was titrated with NaOH solution in an inflow reservoir before reinjection to gradually increase the solution pH in the column. An equilibrium hydrolysis, precipitation and ion exchange reaction model developed through simulation of the preliminary batch titration experiments predicted faster reduction of aqueous Al than observed in the column experiment. The model was therefore modified to consider reaction kinetics for the precipitation and dissolution processes which are the major mechanism for Al immobilization. The combined kinetic and equilibrium reaction model adequately described variations in pH, aqueous concentrations of metal cations (Al, Ca, Mg, Sr, Mn, Ni, Co), sulfate and U(VI). The experimental and modeling results indicate that U(VI) can be effectively sequestered with controlled base addition due to sorption by slowly precipitated Al with pH-dependent surface charge. The model may prove useful to predict field-scale U(VI) sequestration and remediation effectiveness.

View PDFchevron_right
Uranium Diffusion in Soil and Rocks
Charles Shackelford

The results of a study undertaken to review the process of diffusion of uranium in soils and rocks are presented and discussed. After some background on the geochemistry of uranium and the different definitions for the diffusion coefficient in porous media, i.e. D * , D e , D a , values of D * , D e , and/or D a from the literature are summarized, analyzed and discussed. Diffusion of uranium in compacted bentonite is shown to increase semilog linearly with an increase in porosity (decrease in dry density), and appears to be significantly slower than that in other soils, probably due to the existence of semipermeable membrane behavior and interparticle/intraparticle diffusion as an attenuation mechanism. The effect of attenuation is shown to increase the variability in D a relative to that in either D * or D e , and the variability in D * , D e , and D a is shown to be greater in compacted bentonite than in unfractured biotitic granite, likely due to a more homogeneous pore structure and a lesser attenuation capacity for the biotitic granite. Overall, the typical preference for reporting only D a values is shown to severely restrict the usefulness of the literature on the subject.

View PDFchevron_right
Reactive Transport of U and V from Abandoned Uranium Mine Wastes
Sumant Avasarala

Environmental science & technology, 2017

The reactive transport of uranium (U) and vanadium(V) from abandoned mine wastes collected from the Blue Gap/Tachee Claim-28 mine site in Arizona was investigated by integrating flow-through column experiments with reactive transport modeling, and electron microscopy. The mine wastes were sequentially reacted in flow-through columns at pH 7.9 (10 mM HCO) and pH 3.4 (10 mM CHCOOH) to evaluate the effect of environmentally relevant conditions encountered at Blue Gap/Tachee on the release of U and V. The reaction rate constants (k) for the dissolution of uranyl-vanadate (U-V) minerals predominant at Blue Gap/Tachee were obtained from simulations with the reactive transport software, PFLOTRAN. The estimated reaction rate constants were within 1 order of magnitude for pH 7.9 (k= 4.8 × 10mol cms) and pH 3.4 (k= 3.2 × 10mol cms). However, the estimated equilibrium constants (K) for U-V bearing minerals were more than 6 orders of magnitude different for reaction at circumneutral pH (K= 10) ...

View PDFchevron_right

References (107)

  1. Abdelouas A, Lutze W, Nuttall E (1998) Chemical reactions of uranium in ground water at a mill tailings site. J Contam Hydrol 34:343-361
  2. Aharoni C, Sparks DL (1991) Kinetics of soil chemical processes -A theoretical treatment. In: Sparks DL, Suarez DL (eds) Rate of soil chemical processes. Soil Sci Soc Am Spec Publ 27, Soil Sci Soc Am Inc, Madison, WI, pp 1-18
  3. Andersson K, Torstenfelt B, Allard B (1982) Sorption behavior of long- lived radionuclides in igneous rock. In: International Atomic Energy Agency, the Commission of the European Communities and the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (ed) Environmental migration of long-lived radionuclides, Vienna, Austria, pp 111-131
  4. Arai Y, Marcus MK, Tamura N, Davis JA, Zachara JM (2007) Spectroscopic evidence for uranium bearing precipitates in vadose zone sediments at the Hanford 300-area site. Environ Sci Technol 41:4633-4639
  5. Arnold T, Zorn T, Bernhard G, Nitsche H (1998) Sorption of uranium(VI) onto phyllite. Chem Geol 151:129-141
  6. Arnold T, Zorn T, Zänker H, Bernhard G, Nitsche H (2001) Sorption behavior of U(VI) on phyllite: experiments and modeling. J Contam Hydrol 47:219-231
  7. Artinger R, Rabung T, Kim JI, Sachs S, Schmeide K, Heise KH, Bernhard G, Nitsche H (2002) Humic colloid-borne migration of uranium in sand columns. J Contam Hydrol 58:1-12
  8. Baik MH, Hahn PS (2001) Experimental study on uranium sorption onto silica colloids: effects of geochemical parameters. J Korean Nucl Soc 33:261-269
  9. Ball MC, Brown DS, Perkins LJ (1997) Diffuse layers on the surface of mineral quartz. J Mater Chem 7:365-368
  10. Bargar JR, Reitmeyer R, Lenhart JJ, Davis JA (2000) Characterization of U(VI)-carbonato ternary complexes on hematite: EXAFS and elec- trophoretic mobility measurements. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64: 2737-2749
  11. Barnett MO, Jardine PM, Brooks SC, Selim HM (2000) Adsorption and transport of uranium(VI) in subsurface media. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64: 908-917
  12. Bethke CM (1996) Geochemical reaction modeling. Concepts and appli- cations. Oxford University Press, New York Bethke CM (2002) The Geochemist's Workbench® 4.0. University of Illinois, Urbana
  13. Bickmore BR, Nagy KL, Young JS, Drexler JW (2001) Nitrate-cancrinite precipitation on quartz sand in simulated Hanford tank solutions. Environ Sci Technol 35:4481-4486
  14. Bickmore BR, Nagy KL, Gray AK, Brinkerhoff AR (2006) The effect of Al(OH)4-on the dissolution rate of quartz. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:290-305
  15. Cameron DA, Klute A (1977) Convective-dispersive solute transport with a combined equilibrium and kinetic adsorption model. Water Resour Res 19:718-724
  16. Catalano JG, McKinley JP, Zachara JM, Heald SM, Smith SC, Brown GE (2006) Changes in uranium speciation through a depth sequence of contaminated Hanford sediments. Environ Sci Technol 40:2517- 2524
  17. Chen G, Flury M (2005) Retention of mineral colloids in unsaturated porous media as related to their surface properties. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 256:207-216
  18. Cheng T, Barnett MO, Roden EE, Zhuang J (2007) Reactive transport of uranium(VI) and phosphate in a goethite-coated sand column: an experimental study. Chemosphere 68:1218-1223
  19. Coats KH, Smith BD (1964) Dead-end pore volume and dispersion in porous media. Soc Petrol Eng J 4:73-84
  20. Contardi JS, Turner DR, Ahn TM (2001) Modeling colloid transport for performance assessment. J Contam Hydrol 47:323-333
  21. Crançon P, van der Lee J (2003) Speciation and mobility of uranium(VI) in humic-containing soils. Radiochim Acta 91:673-9
  22. Crançon P, Pili E, Charlet L (2010) Uranium facilitated transport by water-dispersible colloids in field and soil columns. Sci Total Environ 408:2118-2128
  23. CXTFIT/EXCEL (2013) CXTFIT code in excel. http://web.ornl.gov/ ~t6g/cxtfit/ (accessed 26 July 2014)
  24. Fortner JA, Mertz CJ, Goldberg MM, Seifert S (2002) Characteristics of aqueous colloids generated by corrosion of metallic uranium fuel. ANL/CMT/CP-106586. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne. http://www.ipd.anl.gov/anlpubs/2002/09/44366.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2013
  25. Fox PM, Davis JA, Zachara JM (2006) The effect of calcium on aqueous uranium(VI) speciation and adsorption to ferrihydrite and quartz. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:1379-1387
  26. Gabriel U, Gaudet J-P, Spadini L, Charlet L (1998) Reactive transport of uranyl in agoethite column: an experimental and modelling study. Chem Geol 151:107-128
  27. Gamerdinger AP, Kaplan DI, Wellman DM, Serne RJ (2001a) Two- region flow and rate-limited sorption of uranium (VI) during trans- port in unsaturated silt loam. Water Resour Res 37:3147-3153
  28. Gamerdinger AP, Kaplan DI, Wellman DM, Serne RJ (2001b) Two- region flow and decreased sorption of uranium (VI) during transport in Hanford groundwater and unsaturated sands. Water Resour Res 37:3155-3162
  29. Giblin AM (1980) The role of clay adsorption in genesis of uranium ores. In: Ferguson J, Goleby AB (eds) Uranium in the Pine Creek geo- syncline. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 521-529
  30. Handley-Sidhu S, Bryan ND, Worsfold PJ, Vaughan DJ, Livens FR, Keith-Roach MJ (2009) Corrosion and transport of depleted urani- um in sand-rich environments. Chemosphere 77:1434-1439
  31. Ho CH, Miller NH (1986) Adsorption of uranyl species from bicarbonate solution onto hematite particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 110:165-171
  32. Huber F, Lützenkirchen J (2009) Uranyl retention on quartz-new ex- perimental data and blind prediction using an existing surface com- plexation model. Aquat Geochem 15:443-456
  33. Jada A, Ait Akbour R, Douch J (2006) Surface charge and adsorption from water onto quartz sand of humic acid. Chemosphere 64:1287-1295
  34. Jones TE, Wood MI, Corbin RA, Simpson BC (2001) Preliminary inventory estimates for single-shell tank leaks in B, BX, and BY tank farms. RPP-7389. CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc, Richland
  35. Kaplan DI, Serne RJ (1995) Distribution coefficient values describing iodine, neptunium, selenium, technetium, and uranium sorption to Hanford sediments. PNL-10379, SUP. 1. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland
  36. Kaplan DI, Gervais TL, Krupka KM (1998) Uranium(VI) sorption to sediments under high pH and ionic strength conditions. Radiochim Acta 80:201-211
  37. Ku TL, Luo S, Goldstein SJ, Murrell MT, Chu WL, Dobson PF (2009) Modeling non-steady state radioisotope transport in the vadose zone-a case study using uranium isotopes at Peña Blanca, Mexico. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:6052-6064
  38. Larson LN, Stone JJ (2011) Sediment-bound arsenic and uranium within the Bowman-Haley Reservoir, North Dakota. Water Air Soil Pollut 219:27-42
  39. Leduc LG, Ferroni GD, Trevors JT (1997) Resistance to heavy metals in different strains of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 13:453-455
  40. Lenhart JJ, Honeyman BD (1999) Uranium(VI) sorption to hematite in the presence of humic acid. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:2891-901
  41. Lesher EK, Honeyman BD, Ranville JF (2013) Detection and character- ization of uranium-humic complexes during 1D transport studies. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 109:127-142
  42. Liu C, Zachara JM, Qafoku O, McKinley JP, Heald SM, Wang Z (2004) Dissolution of uranyl microprecipitates in subsurface sediments at Hanford site, USA. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:4519-4537
  43. Liu CX, Zachara JM, Yantasee W, Majors PD, McKinley JP (2006) Microscopic reactive diffusion of uranium in the contaminated sediments at Hanford, United States. Water Resour Res 42:15
  44. Liu C, Shi Z, Zachara JM (2009) Kinetics of uranium(VI) desorption from contaminated sediments: effect of geochemical conditions and model evaluation. Environ Sci Technol 43:6560-6566
  45. Lu L, Conca J, Parker GR, Leonard PA, Moore B, Strietelmeier B, Triay IR (2000) Adsorption of actinides onto colloids as a function of time, temperature, ionic strength, and colloid concentration. Report LA-UR-00-51-21. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos
  46. Ma R, Zheng C, Prommer H, Greskowiak J, Liu C, Zachara J, Rockhold M (2010) A field-scale reactive transport model for U(VI) migration influenced by coupled multirate mass transfer and surface complex- ation reactions. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2009WR008168
  47. Ma R, Zheng C, Liu C, Greskowiak J, Prommer H, Zachara J (2014a) Assessment of controlling processes for field-scale uranium reactive transport under highly transient flow conditions. Water Resour Res 50:1006-1024
  48. Ma R, Liu C, Greskowiak J, Prommer H, Zachara J, Zheng C (2014b) Influence of calcite on uranium(VI) reactive transport in the groundwater-river mixing zone. J Contam Hydrol 156:27-37
  49. Malin JN, Geiger FM (2010) Uranyl adsorption and speciation at the fused silica/water interface studied by resonantly enhanced second harmonic generation and the χ 3 method. J Phys Chem A 114:1797-1805
  50. Mashal K, Harsh JB, Flury M, Felmy AR, Zhaq H (2004) Colloid formation in Hanford sediments reacted with simulated tank waste. Environ Sci Technol 38:5750-5756
  51. McKinley JP, Zachara JM, Liu C, Heald SC, Prenitzer BI, Kempshall BW (2006) Microscale controls on the fate of contaminant uranium in the vadose zone, Hanford site, Washington. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 70:1873-1887
  52. McKinley JP, Zachara JM, Wan J, McCready DE, Heald SM (2007a) Geochemical controls on contaminant uranium in vadose Hanford formation sediments at the 200 area and 300 area, Hanford site, Washington. Vadose Zone J 6:1004- 1017
  53. McKinley JP, Zachara JM, Smith SC, Liu C (2007b) Cation exchange reactions controlling desorption of 90 Sr 2+ from coarse-grained con- taminated sediments at the Hanford site, Washington. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:305-325
  54. Mertz CJ, Fortner JA, Tsai Y (2003) Understanding the behavior and stability of some uranium mineral colloids. In: Finch RJ, Bullen DB (eds) Scientific basis for nuclear waste management XXVI, vol 757. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Warrendale, pp 489-496
  55. Mibus J, Sachs S, Pfingsten W, Nebelung C, Bernhard G (2007) Migration of uranium(IV)/(VI) in the presence of humic acids in quartz sand: a laboratory column study. J Contam Hydrol 89:199- 217
  56. Mihalik J, Tlustos P, Szakova J (2011) The impact of an abandoned uranium mining area on the contamination of agricultural land in its surroundings. Water Air Soil Pollut 215:693-700
  57. Miller AW, Rodriguez DR, Honeyman BD (2013a) Simplified behaviors from increased heterogeneity: I. 2-D uranium transport experiments at the decimeter scale. J Contam Hydrol 148:39-50
  58. Miller AW, Rodriguez DR, Honeyman BD (2013b) Simplified be- haviors from increased heterogeneity: II. 3-D uranium transport at the decimeter scale and intertank comparisons. J Contam Hydrol 148:51-66
  59. Missana T, García-Gutiérrez M, Alonso Ú (2004) Kinetics and irrevers- ibility of cesium and uranium sorption onto bentonite colloids in a deep granitic environment. Appl Clay Sci 26:137-150
  60. Moyes LN, Parkman RH, Charnock JM, Vaughan DJ, Livens FR, Hughes CR, Braithwaite A (2000) Uranium uptake from aqueous solution by interaction with goethite, lepidocrocite, muscovite, and mackinawite: an X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. Environ Sci Technol 34:1062-1068
  61. Nielsen DR, van Genuchten MT, Biggar JW (1986) Water flow and solute transport processes in the unsaturated zone. Water Resour Res 22: 89S-108S
  62. Nkedi-Kizza P, Biggar JW, Selim HM, van Genuchten MT, Wierenga PJ, Davidson JM, Nielsen DR (1984) On the equivalence of two con- ceptual models for describing ion exchange during transport through an aggregated oxisol. Water Resour Res 20:1123-1130
  63. Parker JC, van Genuchten MTh (1984) Determining transport parameters from laboratory and field tracer experiments. Bull 84-3, Va Agric Exp St, Blacksburg
  64. Phillippi JM, Loganathan VA, McIndoe MJ, Barnett MO, Clement TP, Roden EE (2007) Theoretical solid/solution ratio effects on adsorp- tion and transport: uranium(VI) and carbonate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:329-335
  65. Prikryl JD, Jain A, Turner DR, Pabalan RT (2001) UraniumVI sorption behavior on silicate mineral mixtures. J Contam Hydrol 47:241-253
  66. Qafoku NP, Ainsworth CC, Szecsody JE, Qafoku OS (2004) Transport- controlled kinetics of dissolution and precipitation in the sediments under alkaline and saline conditions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68: 2981-2995
  67. Qafoku NP, Zachara JM, Liu C, Gassman PL, Qafoku OS, Smith SC (2005) Kinetic desorption and sorption of U(VI) during reactive transport in a contaminated Hanford sediment. Environ Sci Technol 39:3157-3165
  68. Read D, Lawless TA, Sims RJ, Butter KR (1993) Uranium migration through intact sandstone cores. J Contam Hydrol 13:277-289
  69. Redden G, Bargar J, Bencheikh-Latmani R (2001) Citrate enhanced uranyl adsorption on goethite: an EXAFS analysis. J Colloid Interface Sci 244:211-219
  70. Reich T, Moll H, Arnold T, Denecke MA, Hennig C, Geipel G, Bernhard G, Nitsche H, Allen PG, Bucher JJ, Edelstein NM, Shuh DK (1998) An EXAFS study of uranium(VI) sorption onto silica gel and ferrihydrite. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 96:237-243
  71. Rimstidt JD, Barnes HL (1980) The kinetics of silica-water reactions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 44:1683-1699
  72. Rod KA, Um W, Flury M (2010) Transport of strontium and cesium in simulated Hanford tank waste leachate through quartz sand under saturated and unsaturated flow. Environ Sci Technol 44: 8089-8094
  73. Rod KA, Wellman DM, Flury M, Pierce EM, Harsh JB (2012) Diffuse release of uranium from contaminated sediments into capillary fringe pore water. J Contam Hydrol 140-141:164-172
  74. Salter PF, Ames LL, McGarrah JE (1981) The sorption behavior of selected radionuclides on Columbia River basalts, RHO-BWI-LD- 48. Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland
  75. Schnug E, Lottermoser BG (2013) Fertilizer-derived uranium and its threat to human health. Environ Sci Technol 47:2433-2434
  76. Selim HM, Davidson JM, Mansell RS (1976) Evaluation of a two-site adsorption-desorption model for describing solute transport in soils. In Proc Summer Computer Simulation Conf, Washington, DC
  77. Serne RJ, Clayton RE, Kutnyakov IV, Last GV, LeGore VL, Wilson TC, Schaef HT, O'Hara MJ, Wagnon KB, Lanigan DC, Brown CF, Williams BA, Lindenmeier CW, Orr RD, Burke DS, Ainsworth CC (2002) Characterization of vadose zone sediment: borehole 41- 09-39 in the S-SX waste management area, PNNL-13757-3. U.S. Department of Energy, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland
  78. Shang J, Liu C, Wang Z, Zachara JM (2011) Effect of grain size on uranium(VI) surface complexation kinetics and adsorption additiv- ity. Environ Sci Technol 45:6025-6031
  79. Shang J, Liu C, Wang Z, Zachara J (2014) Long-term kinetics of uranyl desorption from sediments under advective conditions. Water Resour Res 50:855-870
  80. Sheppard MI, Thibault DH (1988) Migration of technetium, iodine, neptunium, and uranium in the peat of two minerotrophic mires. J Environ Qual 17:644-653
  81. Sims R, Lawless TA, Alexander JL, Bennett DG, Read D (1996) Uranium migration through intact sandstone: effect of pollutant concentration and the reversibility of uptake. J Contam Hydrol 21:215-228
  82. Stoliker DL, Kent DB, Zachara JM (2011) Quantifying differences in the impact of variable chemistry on equilibrium uranium(VI) adsorption properties of aquifer sediments. Environ Sci Technol 45:8733-8740
  83. Stoliker DL, Liu C, Kent DB, Zachara JM (2013) Characterizing particle- scale equilibrium adsorption and kinetics of uranium(VI) desorption from U-contaminated sediments. Water Resour Res 49:1163-1177
  84. Stubbs JE, Veblen LA, Elbert DC, Zachara JM, Davis JA, Veblen DR (2009) Newly recognized hosts for uranium in the Hanford Site vadose zone. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:1563-1576
  85. Tang G, Mayes MA, Parker JC, Jardine PM (2010) CXTFIT/Excel-a modular adaptable code for parameter estimation, sensitivity analy- sis and uncertainty analysis for laboratory or field tracer experi- ments. Comput Geosci 36:1200-1209
  86. Tompson AFB, Hudson GB, Smith DK, Hunt JR (2006) Analysis of radionuclide migration through a 200-m vadose zone following a 16-year infiltration event. Adv Water Resour 29:281-292
  87. Toride N, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MT (1999) The CXTFIT code for estimating transport parameters from laboratory or field tracer ex- periments. Version 2.1, Research Report No. 137. U.S. Salinity Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Riverside
  88. Um W, Wang Z, Serne RJ, Williams BD, Brown CF, Dodge CJ, Francis AJ (2009) Uranium phases in contaminated sediments below Hanford's U tank farm. Environ Sci Technol 43:4280-4286
  89. Um W, Icenhower JP, Brown CF, Serne RJ, Wang Z, Dodge CJ, Francis AJ (2010a) Characterization of uranium-contaminated sediments from beneath a nuclear waste storage tank from Hanford, Washington: implications for contaminant transport and fate. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:1363-1380
  90. Um W, Zachara JM, Liu C, Moore DA, Rod KA (2010b) Resupply mechanism to a contaminated aquifer: a laboratory study of U(VI) desorption from capillary fringe sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 74:5155-5170
  91. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1999) Understanding variation in partition coefficient, Kd, values: volume II. Review of geochemistry and available Kd values for cadmium, cesium, chro- mium, lead, plutonium, radon, strontium, thorium, tritium (3H), and uranium. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation. EPA 402-R-99-004B http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/ kdreport/vol2/402-r-99-004b.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2013
  92. van Genuchten MT, Wagenet RJ (1989) Two-site/two-region models for pesticide transport and degradation: theoretical development and analytical solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1303-1310
  93. van Genuchten MT, Wierenga PJ (1976) Mass transfer studies in sorbing porous media: I. Analytical solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 40:473-481
  94. Viani BE, Torretto PC (1998) Sorption and transport of uranium on hematite. UCRL-ID-129848, YMP Milestone Report SPL3BM4 - 1997. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore
  95. Waite TD, Davis JA, Payne TE, Waychunas GA, Xu N (1994) Uranium(VI) adsorption to ferrihydrite: application of a surface complexation model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58:5465- 5478
  96. Wang G, Um W (2012) Mineral dissolution and secondary precipitation on quartz sand in simulated Hanford tank solutions affecting sub- surface porosity. J Hydrol 472-473:159-168
  97. Wang Z, Zachara JM, Gassman PL, Liu C, Qafoku O, Yantasee W, Catalano JG (2005) Fluorescence spectroscopy of U(VI)-silicates and U(VI)-contaminated Hanford sediment. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:1391-1403
  98. Wellman DM, Gamerdinger AP, Kaplan DI, Serne RJ (2008) Effect of particle-scale heterogeneity on uranium(VI) transport in unsaturated porous media. Vadose Zone J 7:67-78
  99. Williams BA, Brown CF, Um W, Nimmons MJ, Peterson RE, Bjornstad BN, Lanigan DC, Serne RJ, Spane FA, Rockhold ML (2007) Limited field investigation report for uranium con- tamination in the 300 area, 300-FF-5 operable unit, Hanford Site, Washington. PNNL-16435. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland
  100. Yabusaki SB, Fang Y, Waichler SR (2008) Building conceptual models of field-scale uranium reactive transport in a dynamic vadose zone- aquifer-river system. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/ 2007WR006617
  101. Yabusaki SB, Fang Y, Williams KH, Murray CJ, Ward AL, Dayvault RD, Waichler SR, Newcomer DR, Spane FA, Long PE (2011) Variably saturated flow and multicomponent biogeochemical reactive trans- port modeling of a uranium bioremediation field experiment. J Contam Hydrol 126:271-290
  102. Yin J, Haggerty R, Stoliker DL, Kent DB, Istok JD, Greskowiak J, Zachara JM (2011) Transient groundwater chemistry near a river: effects on U(VI) transport in laboratory column experiments. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2010WR009369
  103. Zachara JM, Ainsworth CC, McKinley JP, Murphy EM, Westall JC, Rao PSC (1992) Subsurface chemistry of organic ligand-radionuclide mixtures. In: Pacific Northwest Laboratory Annual Report for 1991 to the DOE Office of Energy Research Part 2: Environmental Science, PNL-8000 Pt. 2. Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, pp 1-12
  104. Zänker H, Hüttig G, Arnold T, Nitsche H (2006) Formation of iron- containing colloids by the weathering of phyllite. Aquat Geochem 12:299-325
  105. Zheng Z, Wan J (2005) Release of contaminant U(VI) from soils. Radiochim Acta 93:211-217
  106. Zhuang J, Flury M, Jin Y (2003) Colloid-facilitated Cs transport through water-saturated Hanford sediment and Ottawa sand. Environ Sci Technol 37:4905-4911
  107. Zielinski RA (1980) Uranium in secondary silica: a possible exploration guide. Econ Geol 75:592-602

Related papers

Geochemical conditions affecting uranium(VI) fate and transport in soil and groundwater in the presence of phosphate
Abhas Singh

2010

Soil and groundwater contamination with actinides like uranium is a serious environmental concern.

View PDFchevron_right
Hexavalent Uranium Diffusion into Soils from Concentrated Acidic and Alkaline Solutions
Matt Newville

Environmental Science & Technology, 2004

Uranium contamination of soils and sediments often originates from acidic or alkaline waste sources, with diffusion being a major transport mechanism. Measurements of U(VI) diffusion from initially pH 2 and pH 11 solutions into a slightly alkaline Altamont soil and a neutral Oak Ridge soil were obtained through monitoring uptake from boundary reservoirs and from U concentration profiles within soil columns. The soils provided pH buffering, resulting in diffusion at nearly constant pH. Micro x-ray absorption near edge structure spectra confirmed that U remained in U(VI) forms in all soils. Time trends of U(VI) depletion from reservoirs, and U(VI) concentration profiles within soil columns yielded K d values consistent with those determined in batch tests at similar concentrations (≈ 1 mM), and much lower than values for sorption at much lower concentrations (nM to µM).

View PDFchevron_right
Uranium(VI) mobility in groundwater is strongly affected by sorption of mobile U(VI)
Dieter Schild

2009

* Manuscript solutions. This can be explained by the formation of Fe(II) carbonates on the mineral surfaces which represent an easily available Fe(II) pool for the U(VI) reduction. We also consider a facilitated U(VI) reduction as possible when uranium is present as a carbonate complex compared to non-complexed uranium (e.g. uranyl).

View PDFchevron_right
Kinetic Desorption and Sorption of U(VI) during Reactive Transport in a Contaminated Hanford Sediment
Nikolla Qafoku

Environmental Science & Technology, 2005

Column experiments were conducted to investigate U(VI) desorption and sorption kinetics in a sand-textured, U(VI)contaminated (22.7 µmol kg -1 ) capillary fringe sediment from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Hanford site. Saturated column experiments were performed under mildly alkaline conditions representative of the Hanford site where uranyl-carbonate and calcium-uranyl-carbonate complexes dominate aqueous speciation. A U(VI)-free solution was used to study contaminant U(VI) desorption in columns where different flow rates were applied. Sorbed, contaminant U(VI) was partially labile (11.8%), and extended leaching times and water volumes were required for complete desorption of the labile fraction. Uranium-(VI) sorption was studied after the desorption of labile, contaminant U(VI) using different U(VI) concentrations in the leaching solution. Strong kinetic effects were observed for both U(VI) sorption and desorption, with half-life ranging from 8.5 to 48.5 h for sorption and from 39.3 to 150 h for desorption. Although U(VI) is semi-mobile in mildly alkaline, subsurface environments, we observed substantial U(VI) adsorption, significant retardation during transport, and atypical breakthrough curves with extended tailing. A distributed rate model was applied to describe the effluent data and to allow comparisons between the desorption rate of contaminant U(VI) with the rate of shortterm U(VI) sorption. Desorption was the slower process. We speculate that the kinetic behavior results from transport or chemical phenomena within the phyllosilicatedominated fine fraction present in the sediment. Our results suggest that U(VI) release and transport in the vadose zone and aquifer system from which the sediment was obtained are kinetically controlled.

View PDFchevron_right
Uranium mobility in subsurface aqueous systems: the influence of redox conditions
Thilo Behrends

Mineralogical Magazine, 2008

Uranium is a redox-sensitive element and can be immobilized by reduction from soluble U(VI) to insoluble U(IV). By performing flow-through experiments, uranium mobility was observed under different redox conditions. Inflow solutions with different electron acceptors, nitrate and sulphate, and a control inflow solution were used to obtain different sedimentary redox conditions. Uranium was about one order more mobile when nitrate was used than when sulphate or the control was used. The difference in uranium mobility is attributed to the reduction of uranium. Even though uranium mobility is heavily dependent on the redox state of uranium, sedimentary concentrations of organic matter argue that organic matter is the most important complexing agent and that this determines the retardation of uranium.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Earth Sciences
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved