Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

A theory of consciousness

2001, www. mind-consciousness- …

Abstract
sparkles

AI

The paper presents a theory of consciousness that aims to reconcile the apparent contradiction in the metaphor of the stream of consciousness as both a continuous flow and composed of unique, individual states. It proposes that consciousness results from the interaction between two systems: the perceptual system, which captures sensory inputs and informs a schema of self, and the schema of self, which processes these inputs and generates instructions for the perceptual system. This ongoing exchange creates a coherent stream of consciousness, where unique perceptions arise from specific interactions between the two systems, ultimately facilitating self-awareness and reflection on one's actions.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What role does the perceptual system play in consciousness development?add

The study finds that the perceptual system provides the raw materials through conscious perceptions, which continually update the schema of self, facilitating the emergence of consciousness. For instance, each interaction generates unique perceptions that are crucial to this development.

How does attention influence conscious perception in organisms?add

Evidence shows that conscious perception cannot occur without prior attention; between 60% to 80% of subjects fail to detect unexpected stimuli when attention is engaged elsewhere. This implies that attention is crucial in isolating specific stimuli for consciousness.

In what ways does the schema of self impact behavior?add

The schema of self continuously updates through conscious experiences, allowing for autonomous modification of behavior. The research illustrates that it enables the organism to act based on conscious decisions rather than merely instinctual responses.

What distinguishes consciousness from self-consciousness according to the research?add

Consciousness allows organisms to achieve specified results driven by innate instincts, while self-consciousness empowers them to autonomously define goals and control their actions. This distinction highlights the transition from reactive to proactive behaviors in subjects.

What evidence supports the distinction between low-level and high-level attention?add

The study indicates that only low-level (preliminary) attention can occur without consciousness, while high-level attention remains integrally linked to conscious experience. This differentiation is underscored by cases of attentional processing in patients lacking self-awareness.

References (54)

  1. Allport, D. A., Antonis, B. and Reynolds, P. (1972). "On the division of attention: A disproof of the single hypothesis". Quarterly Journal of experimental Psychology, 24: 225-235.
  2. Baars, B.J. (1988). A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  3. Broadbent, D. A. (1958). Perception and Communication. Pergamon Press. London.
  4. Castiello, U. & Umiltà, C. (1992). "Splitting focal attention". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18: 837-848.
  5. Ceccato, S. (1985). Ingegneria della felicità. Rizzoli. Milano Ceccato, S. (1987). La fabbrica del bello. Rizzoli. Milano.
  6. Ceccato, S. and Zonta, B. (1980). Linguaggio consapevolezza pensiero. Feltrinelli. Milano.
  7. Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind. In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press. New York.
  8. Cimatti, F. (2000). La scimmia che si parla. Linguaggio autocoscienza e libertà nell'animale umano. Boringhieri. Torino.
  9. Damasio, A. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens. Body and Emotions in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt Brace & Co. New York.
  10. Edelman, G. M. (1989). The Remembered Present: a Biological Theory of Consciousness. Basic Books. New York.
  11. Eriksen, C. W. and St. James, J. D. (1986). "Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model". Perception and Psychophysics, 40: 225-240.
  12. Fagot, C. and Pashler, H. (1992). "Making Two Responses to a Single Object: Implications for the Central Attentional Bottleneck". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18: 1058-1079.
  13. Freeman, W. J. (1999). How Brains make up their Minds. Weidenfeld, Nicolson. London.
  14. Hartman, M., Knopman, D. S. and Nissen, M. J. (1987). "Implicit learning of new verbal associations". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15: 1070-1082.
  15. Holender, D. (1986). "Semantic activation without consciousness in dichotic listening, parafoveal vision and visual masking. A survey and appraisal". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 9: 1-66.
  16. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. Holt. New York. (Reprint, 1983, Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA).
  17. Johnson-Laird. P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  18. Johnson-Laird. P. N. (1988). "A computational analysis of consciousness". In Marcel A. J. and Bisiach E. (eds.): Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  19. Kahneman, D. and Chajczyk, D. (1983). "Test of the automaticity of reading: Diluition of Stroop effects by colour- irrelevant stimuli". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9: 497-509.
  20. Lackner, J. and Garrett, M. F. (1973). "Resolving ambiguity: Effect of biasing context in the unattended ear". Cognition, 1: 359-372.
  21. La Berge, D. (1995). Attentional Processing. The Brain's Art of Mindfulness. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA. Lavie, N. (1995). "Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21: 451-468.
  22. Libet, B. (1985). "Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8: 529-566.
  23. Logan, G. D. (1995). "Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention". Cognitive Psychology, 28: 103- 174.
  24. Mack, A. and Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional Blindness. Bradford Book. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
  25. MacKay, D. G. (1973). "Aspects of the theory of comprehension, memory and attention". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25: 22-40.
  26. Marcel, A.J. (1980). "Conscious and preconscious recognition of polysemous words: Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context". In Nickerson R. S. (ed.): Attention and Performance VII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillside, NJ.
  27. Marcel, A.J. (1983). "Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition". Cognitive Psychology, 15: 197-237.
  28. Marchetti, G. (1993). The Mechanics of the Mind. Espansione. Roma
  29. Marchetti, G. (2000). "Observation levels and units of time: A critical analysis of the main assumption of the theory of the artificial". AI & Society, 14: 331-347.
  30. McLeod, P. D. (1977). "A dual task response modality effect: Support for multi-processor models of attention". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29: 651-667.
  31. Morray, N. (1959). "Attention and Dichotic Listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions". Quarterly Journal Experimental Psychology, 11: 56-60.
  32. Negrotti, M. (1999). The Theory of the Artificial. Virtual Replication and the revenge of Reality. Intellect Books. Exeter, England.
  33. Neuman, O. (1984). "Automatic processing. A review of recent findings and a plead for an old theory". In Printz, W and Sanders, A. (eds.): Cognition and Motor Processes. Springer. Berlin.
  34. Nissen, M. J. and Bullemer, P. (1987). "Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures". Cognitive Psychology, 19: 1-32.
  35. Piaget, J. (1967). La construction du réel chez l'enfant. Delachaux & Niestlé. Paris-Neochâtel.
  36. Posner, M. I. and Boies, S. J. (1971). "Components of attention". Psychological review, 78: 391-408.
  37. Reeke, G. N. and Edelman, G. M. (1995). "A darwinist view of the prospects for conscious artifacts". In Trautteur, G. (ed.): Consciousness: Distinction and Reflection. Bibliopolis. Napoli.
  38. Reeves, A. and Sperling, G. (1986). "Attention gating in short-term visual memory". Psychological Review, 93: 180- 206.
  39. Searle, J. R. (1980). "Minds, Brains, and Programs". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 417-424.
  40. Searle, J. R. (1984). Minds, Brains, and Science: The 1984 Reith Lectures. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.
  41. Searle, J. R. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. The MIT Press. Cambridge.
  42. Shallice, T. (1988). "Information-processing models of consciousness: possibilities and problems". In Marcel A. J. and Bisiach E. (eds.): Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  43. Styles, E. A. (1997). The Psychology of Attention. Psychology Press. Hove.
  44. Tipper, S. P. (1985). "The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A: 571-590.
  45. Treisman, A. M. (1964a). "Verbal cues, language and meaning in attention". American Journal of Psychology, 77: 206- 214.
  46. Treisman, A. M. (1964b). "The effect of irrelevant material on the efficiency of selective listening". American Journal of Psychology, 77: 533-546.
  47. Tsal, Y. (1983). "Movement of attention across the visual field". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9: 523-530.
  48. Umiltà, C. (1988). "The control operations of consciousness". In Marcel A. J. and Bisiach E. (eds.): Consciousness in Contemporary Science. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  49. Umiltà, C. (1994). "Attenzione e coscienza". In Legrenzi P. (ed.): Manuale di psicologia generale. Il Mulino. Bologna Vaccarino, G. (1974). La mente vista in operazioni. G. d'Anna. Messina-Firenze.
  50. Vaccarino, G. (1981). Analisi dei significati. Armando Armando. Roma.
  51. Valéry, P. (1973). Cahiers. Ed. by Judith Robinson-Valéry. Gallimard. Paris. (Italian translation, 1988: Quaderni. Volume terzo. Adelphi. Milano).
  52. Velmans, M. (1991). "Is human information processing conscious?". Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14: 651-726.
  53. Vygotskij, L.S. (1973). Problemy psichičeskogo razvitija rebënka. (Italian translation, 1984: Lo sviluppo psichico del bambino. Editori Riuniti. Roma).
  54. Weinrich, H. (1988). Lingua e linguaggio nei testi. Feltrinelli. Milano.