Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Concept Map Mining: A definition and a framework for its evaluation

Abstract

"Concept maps are visual representations of knowledge, widely used in educational contexts. We use the term ”Concept Map Mining” (CMM) to refer to the automatic extraction of Concept Maps from documents such as essays. The principles behind CMM have been proposed for applications such as: information extraction in specific knowledge domains, the measurement of student understanding and misconceptions based on written essays, and as a preliminary step to creating domain ontologies. Previous work on the automatic extraction of concept maps present two problems: 1) overly simplistic and varying definitions of concept maps, and 2) the lack of an evaluation framework that can be used to measure the quality of the generated maps. In this paper, we propose a formal definition of the term CMM, with a focus on educational applications. We also propose an evaluation framework that will allow other researchers to share a common ground to evaluate the performance of CMM methods."

References (15)

  1. A. O. Alves, F. C. Pereira, and A. Cardoso. Automatic read- ing and learning from text. In Proceedings of the Interna- tional Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, 2002.
  2. N.-S. Chen, P. Kinshuk, C.-W. Wei, and H.-J. Chen. Min- ing e-learning domain concept map from academic articles. Computers & Education, 50:694-698, 2008.
  3. R. B. Clariana and R. Koul. A computer-based approach for translating text into concept map-like representations. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Con- cept Mapping, 2004.
  4. J. Emig. Writing as a mode of learning. College Composi- tion and Communication, 28:122-128, 1977.
  5. K. en Chang, Y.-T. Sung, and I.-D. Chen. The effect of con- cept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summa- rization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1):5- 23, 2002.
  6. Y. Gong and X. Liu. Generic text summarization using rel- evance measure and latent semantic analysis. In SIGIR '01: Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information re- trieval, pages 19-25. ACM, 2001.
  7. M. A. Hearst. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics, 1992.
  8. M. A. Hearst. The debate on automated essay grading. Intel- ligent Systems and Their Applications, 15(5):22-37, 2000.
  9. H. Herl, H. O. Jr., G. Chung, and J. Schacter. Reliability and validity of a computer-based knowledge mapping system to measure content understanding. Computers in Human Be- havior, 15:315-333, 1999.
  10. J. R. McClure, B. Sonak, and H. K. Suen. Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teach- ing, 36:475-492, 1999.
  11. J. D. Novak and D. B. Gowin. Learning How To Learn. Cambridge University Press, 1984.
  12. R. Richardson and E. A. Fox. Using concept maps in digi- tal libraries as a cross-language resource discovery tool. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, 2005.
  13. J. F. Sowa. Semantic networks. Wiley, 1987.
  14. A. Valerio and D. Leake. Jump-starting concept map con- struction with knowledge extracted from documents. In Pro- ceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping, 2006.
  15. A. Zouaq, R. Nkambou, and C. Frasson. Building domain ontologies from text for educational purposes. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 4753:393-407, 2007.