The role of visualization in learning from computer‐based images
2005, International Journal of Science Education
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690412331314478Abstract
Among the sciences, the practice of geology is especially visual. To assess the role of spatial ability in learning geology, we designed an experiment using: (1) web-based versions of spatial visualization tests, (2) a geospatial test, and (3) multimedia instructional modules built around QuickTime Virtual Reality movies. Students in control and experimental sections were administered measures of spatial orientation and visualization, as well as a content-based geospatial examination. All subjects improved significantly in their scores on spatial visualization and the geospatial examination. There was no change in their scores on spatial orientation. A three-way analysis of variance, with the geospatial examination as the dependent variable, revealed significant main effects favoring the experimental group and a significant interaction between treatment and gender. These results demonstrate that spatial ability can be improved through instruction, that learning of geological content will improve as a result, and that differences in performance between the genders can be eliminated.
References (35)
- BEN-CHAIM, D., LAPPAN, G. and HOUANG, R. (1988). The effect of instruction on spatial visualization skills of middle school boys and girls. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 51-71.
- CARTER, C., LARUSSA, M. and BODNER, G. (1987). A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(7), 645-657.
- COHEN, H. (1983). A comparison of the effect of two types of student behavior with manipulatives on the development of projective spatial structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 875-883.
- COLEMAN, S. and GOTCH, A. (1998). Spatial perception skills of chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 206-209.
- DEVON, R., ENGEL, R. and TURNER, G. (1998). The effects of spatial visualization skill training on gender and retention in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4, 371-380.
- EKSTROM, R., FRENCH, J., HARMAN, H. and DERMEN, D. (1976). Manual for Kit of Factor Referenced Cognitive Tests (Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service).
- ELEY, M. (1993). The differential susceptibility of topographic map interpretation to influence from training. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 23-42.
- HSI, S., LINN, M. and BELL, J. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86, 151-158.
- KALI, Y. and ORION, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students and the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 369-391.
- LORD, T. (1985). Enhancing the visuo-spatial aptitude of students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 395-405.
- LORD, T. (1987). A look at spatial abilities in undergraduate women science majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(8), 757-767.
- MACCOBY, E. and JACKLIN, C. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
- MANN, D., SHAKESHAFT, C., BECKER, A.J. and KOTTKAMP, R. (1999). West Virginia Story: Achievement Gains from a Statewide Comprehensive Instructional Technology Program (Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology).
- MCCLURG, P. (1992). Investigating the development of spatial cognition in problem-solving microworlds. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 3(2), 111-126.
- MUEHLBERGER, W.L. and BOYER, R.E. (1961). Space relations test as a measure of visualization ability. Journal of Geological Education, 9, 62-69.
- O'SULLIVAN, C. and WEISS, A. (1999). Student Work and Teacher Practices in Science: A Report on What Students Know and Can Do (NCES 1999-445) (Jessup, MD: National Center for Educational Statistics).
- PAIVIO, A. (1990). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach (New York: Oxford University Press).
- PALLRAND, G. and SEEBER, F. (1984). Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(5), 507-516.
- PIAGET, J. and INHELDER, B. (1967). The Child's Conception of Space (New York: Norton).
- PIBURN, M. (1980). Spatial reasoning as a correlate of formal thought and science achievement for New Zealand students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(5), 443-448.
- PROVO, J., LAMAR, C. and NEWBY, T. (2002). Using a cross section to train veterinary students to visualize anatomical structures in three dimensions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 10-34.
- RAVITZ, J., MERGENDOLLER, J. and RUSS, W. (2002). What's school got to do with it? Cautionary tales about correlations between student computer use and academic achievement. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
- REYNOLDS, S.J., JOHNSON, J.K. and STUMP, E. (2001). Observing and Interpreting Geology: A Laboratory Manual for Introductory Geology (Tucson, AZ: Terra Chroma).
- RIEBER, L.P. (1995). A historical review of visualization in human cognition. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 45-56.
- ROE, A. (1961). The psychology of the scientist. Science, 134, 456-459.
- SCHOFIELD, J. and KIRBY, J. (1994). Position location on topographical maps: Effects of task factors, training, and strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 12(1), 35-60.
- SHEPARD, R. (1978). The mental image. American Psychologist, 33, 125-137.
- SHEPARD, R. (1988). The Imagination of the scientist. In K. Egan and D. Nadaner (eds.) Imagination and Education (New York: Teachers' College Press), 153-185.
- SHEPARD, R. and CHIPMAN, S. (1970). Second order isomorphism of representations: Shapes of states. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 1-17.
- SHEPARDLER, R. and METZLER, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
- TUCKEY, H. and M. SELVARATNAM (1993). Studies involving three-dimensional visualization skills in chemistry: A review. Studies in Science Education, 21, 99-121.
- VASTA, R., KNOTT, J. and GAZE, C. (1996). Can spatial training erase the gender differences on the water-level task? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(4), 459-567.
- WEGLINSKY, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Policy Information Report, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
- WITKIN, H., MOORE, C., GOODENOUGH, D. and COX, P. (1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive style and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.
- ZAVOTKA, S. (1987). Three-dimensional computer animated graphics: A tool for spatial instruction. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 35(3), 133-144.