Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Improving Bound Propagation

2006, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This paper extends previously proposed bound propagation algorithm for computing lower and upper bounds on posterior marginals in Bayesian networks. We improve the bound propagation scheme by taking advantage of the directionality in Bayesian networks and applying the notion of relevant subnetwork. We also propose an approximation scheme for the linear optimization subproblems. We demonstrate empirically that while the resulting bounds loose some precision, we achieve 10-100 times speedup compared to original bound propagation using a simplex solver.

References (16)

  1. COmputational INfrastructure for Operations Research, http://www.coin-or.org.
  2. A. M. Abdelbar and S. M. Hedetniemi, 'Approximating maps for belief networks is NP-hard and other theorems', Artificial Intelligence, 102, 21-38, (1998).
  3. B. Bidyuk and R. Dechter, 'An anytime scheme for bounding posterior beliefs', in In Proc. of 21st National Conf. on AI (AAAI), (2006).
  4. B. Bidyuk and R. Dechter, 'Improving bound propagation', Technical report, UCI, http://www.ics.uci.edu/˜bbidyuk/bp.html, (2006).
  5. D. Bienstock, Potential function methods for approximately solving lin- ear programming problems: theory and practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
  6. P. Dagum and M. Luby, 'Approximating probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks is NP-hard', Artificial Intelligence, 60(1), 141-153, (1993).
  7. E.J. Horvitz, H.J. Suermondt, and G.F. Cooper, 'Bounded conditioning: Flexible inference for decisions under scarce resources', in Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 181-193, (1989).
  8. M. Kearns and L. Saul, 'Large deviation methods for approximate prob- abilistic inference, with rates of convergence', in Proc. of Uncertainty in AI, pp. 311-319. Morgan Kaufmann, (1998).
  9. M. Kearns and L. Saul, 'Inference in multilayer networks via large de- viation bounds', Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 11, 260-266, (1999).
  10. D. Larkin, 'Approximate decomposition: A method for bounding and estimating probabilistic and deterministic queries', in Proc. of UAI, pp. 346-353, (2003).
  11. M. A. R. Leisink and H. J. Kappen, 'Bound propagation', Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 19, 139-154, (2003).
  12. M. V. Mannino and V. S. Mookerjee, 'Probability bounds for goal di- rected queries in Bayesian networks', IEEE Transactions on Knowl- edge and Data Engineering, 14(5), 1196-1200, (September/October 2002).
  13. J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kauf- mann, 1988.
  14. D. Poole, 'Probabilistic conflicts in a search algorithm for estimating posterior probabilities in Bayesian networks', Artificial Intelligence, 88(1-2), 69-100, (1996).
  15. David Poole, 'Context-specific approximation in probabilistic infer- ence', in Proc. of Uncertainty in AI, pp. 447-454, (1998).
  16. R. L. Rivest T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, Introduction to Algorithms, MIT Press, 1990.