A Case of Mistaken (Gender) Identity, 1802
2025, Nepean District Historical Society Bulletin,.87, September
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
First contact between the European arrivals and the indigenous peoples on the east coast of Australia in the late 18th and early 19th centuries makes for fascinating study. The meeting of two very different cultures provide vignettes of confusion, misunderstanding and culture shock. This brief paper looks at how matters of gender identity were resolved in some first contact situations between Europeans and Indigenous Australians in South Eastern Australia between (1788 -1802).
Related papers
Aboriginal History Journal, 2011
A]ssimilation is our word. Many Aboriginals take it as meaning tlrey are to be bred out. They wish tobea distinctive people ... The desire of the Aboriginals to be a distinctive people is something we should respect. 1 What did the word 'assimilation' really mean in the mouths of white Australian politicians when they referred to Aboriginal people in the late 19th and early 20th centuries? This paper, part of a larger project which compares interracial marriages of white women and Indigenous men in Australia and the United States, begins from the assumption that umbrella terms such as I assimilation' can mean different things in different times and places. Comparative historians are urged not to assume that 'because they bear the same label, ideas, institutions, or groups ... perform the same function everywhere'< As this paper will show, such insights prove valuable when seeking to understand the particular policies aimed at Indigenous people in a unique settler society such as Australia. This paper has stemmed from a comparative investigation into the rudimentary attempts to promote cultural assimilation in Australia and the United States through 1. 2.
Journal: Settler Colonial Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6-26. , 2013
In hundreds of printed accounts that reflected on gender relations in the Australian Aboriginal society, settlers routinely characterised women as subject to 'tyrannical' menwhom they pilloried as 'lords and masters'. The settler-colonial trope of Bride Capture reiterated wellworn meanings about Aboriginal gender relations in print culture. That the treatment of women in 'native tribes' became an indice of civilisation is well established in studies of colonial gender relations. This article examines the critical role of print in instating and entrenching those understandings through a tracery of reiterations of Bride Capture.
Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 2019
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2020
2021
This article discusses the historical presentation of Indigenous Australian women as depicted through the 1980 paradigms of Euro-Australian feminist and anthropologist Dianne Belle. While Belle's paradigms, Man Equals Culture; An Anthropology of Women; and Towards a Feminist Perspective, provide a comprehensive history of written accounts of the lives of Indigenous Australian women, such accounts are always written by someone else; an onlooker or outsider. The accounts are mainly written by white anthropologists, both male and female, and are based on a white perception. In this article, I argue for the establishment of a fourth paradigm: Towards a Womanist Perspective; one which focuses on the life writings of Indigenous Australian women themselves. I support my argument through an indepth study of both Alice Nannup's When the Pelican Laughed (1992) and Rita and Jackie Huggins' Aunty Rita (1994). I discuss both autobiographies in the light of womanism, a concept separate to that of mainstream feminism. While feminism is necessary, it can unintentionally overlook the needs of some women, in particular, the needs of Indigenous women. In her book, Talkin' Up to the White Woman (2000), Aboriginal academic Aileen Moreton-Robinson states that unlike white women, Indigenous women have to deal with two patriarchies: that within their own societies and that of the overarching colonial power. I discuss this double patriarchy in the light of Alice Nannup's and Rita and Jackie Huggins' life writings and argue for a womanist-based approach to future academic study.
Journal of the Anthropological Society of South Australia, 2018
Cultural Studies, 1997
This is an electronic version of an article published in [Cultural Studies, 11(2),. [Cultural Studies] is available online at informaworld.
Australian Feminist Studies, 2000
2 Warring peoples have long regarded women as the spoils of conquest. It is not surprising, then, that in the extremely gender disproportionate (male-dominated) nineteenth century Northern Territory Aboriginal women arguably played the key role in race relations. In a sense Aboriginal women spoiled European conquest, with their relations with non-Aboriginals posing such ethical, criminal and political problems that this proved to be the deciding factor in the eventual policy shift in the Territory to protective legislation for Aboriginal people. This essay focuses on the initial push for such legislation, namely, the Aborigines Bill, 1899.
Cultures of the Commonwealth, Essays and Studies, 2016

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.