Criteria in AHP: a Systematic Review of Literature
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2015.07.081Abstract
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is widely used by decision makers and researchers. The definition of criteria and the calculation of their weight are central in this method to assess the alternatives. However, there are few studies that focus on them. The purpose of this study is to develop a systematic review of literature on the real cases that applied AHP to evaluate how the criteria are being defined and measured. In the 33 cases selected, they mainly used literature to build the criteria and AHP or Fuzzy AHP to calculate their weight, while other techniques were used to evaluate alternatives.
References (45)
- Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 2008;1:83-98.
- Vaidya OS, Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 2006;169:1-29.
- Forman E, Gass S. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Exposition. Oper Res 2001;49:469-86.
- Wallenius J, Dyer JS, Fishburn PC, Steuer RE, Zionts S, Deb K. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead. Manage Sci 2008;54:1336-49.
- Davies MAPA. Multicriteria Decision Model Application for Managing Group Decisions. J Oper Res Soc 1994;45:47-58.
- Forman E, Peniwati K. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 1998;108:165-9.
- Haller W, Tiedeman E, Whitaker R. Expert choice -User Manual. Pittsburgh, PA: Expert Choice; 1996.
- Petticrew M, Roberts H. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.
- Ngai EWT, Chan EWC. Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP. Expert Syst Appl 2005;29:889-99.
- Bertolini M, Braglia M, Carmignani G. Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract. Int J Proj Manag 2006;24:422-30.
- Durán O, Aguilo J. Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Syst Appl 2008;34:1787-94.
- ds under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 2009;36:8143-51.
- Celik M, Deha Er I, Ozok a. F. Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry. Expert Syst Appl 2009;36:190-8.
- Cebeci U. Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard. Expert Syst Appl 2009;36:8900-9.
- Amiri MP. Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 2010;37:6218-24.
- Pophali GR, Chelani AB, Dhodapkar RS. Optimal selection of full scale tannery effluent treatment alternative using integrated AHP and GRA approach. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:10889-95.
- Kilincci O, Onal SA. Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:9656-64.
- Kaya T, Kahraman C. Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:7326-33.
- Ju Y, Wang A, Liu X. Evaluating emergency response capacity by fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach. Expert Syst Appl 2012;39:6972-81.
- Ho W, He T, Lee CKM, Emrouznejad A. Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Syst Appl 2012;39:10841-50.
- Bulut E, Duru O, Keçeci T, Yoshida S. Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy- AHP modeling: A process model for shipping asset management. Expert Syst Appl 2012;39:1911-23.
- Rezaei J, Fahim PBM, Tavasszy L. Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst Appl 2014;41:8165-79.
- Chan FTS, Kumar N. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega 2007;35:417-31.
- Chang CW, Wu CR, Chen HC. Using expert technology to select unstable slicing machine to control wafer slicing quality via fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst Appl 2008;34:2210-20.
- CG, Çinar G. Evaluation and pre-allocation of operators with multiple skills: A combined fuzzy AHP and max-min approach. Expert Syst Appl 2010;37:2043-53.
- Sun CC. A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 2010;37:7745-54.
- Rad a., Naderi B, Soltani M. Clustering and ranking university majors using data mining and AHP algorithms: A case study in Iran. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:755-63.
- Kaya T, Kahraman C. An integrated fuzzy AHP-ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:8553-62.
- Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G. A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Syst Appl 2012;39:2341-54.
- Bentes AV, Carneiro J, da Silva JF, Kimura H. Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP. J Bus Res 2012;65:1790-9.
- Das MC, Sarkar B, Ray S. A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology. Socioecon Plann Sci 2012;46:230-41.
- Melón MG, Aragonés Beltran P, Carmen González Cruz M. An AHP-based evaluation procedure for Innovative Educational Projects: A face-to-face vs. computer-mediated case study. Omega 2008;36:754-65.
- Huang CC, Chu PY, Chiang YH. A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega 2008;36:1038- 52.
- Lee AHI, Chen WC, Chang CJ. A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 2008;34:96-107.
- Yang CL, Chuang SP, Huang RH. Manufacturing evaluation system based on AHP/ANP approach for wafer fabricating industry. Expert Syst Appl 2009;36:11369-77.
- Hsu Y-L, Lee C-H, Kreng VB. The application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection. Expert Syst Appl 2010;37:419-25.
- Lo YF, Wen MH. A fuzzy-ahp-based technique for the decision of design feature selection in massively multiplayer online role- playing game development. Expert Syst Appl 2010;37:8685-93.
- Vidal LA, Marle F, Bocquet JC. Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects. Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:5388-405.
- Rostamzadeh R, Sofian S. Prioritizing effective 7Ms to improve production systems performance using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS (case study). Expert Syst Appl 2011;38:5166-77.
- Calabrese A, Costa R, Menichini T. Using Fuzzy AHP to manage Intellectual Capital assets: An application to the ICT service industry. Expert Syst Appl 2013;40:3747-55.
- Podgórski D. Measuring operational performance of OSH management system -A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Saf Sci 2015;73:146-66.
- Saaty TL, Ozdemir MS. Why the magic number seven plus or minus two. Math Comput Model 2003;38:233-44.
- Saaty TL, Tran LT. On the invalidity of fuzzifying numerical judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Math Comput Model 2007;46:962-75.
- Saaty TL, Vargas LG. Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. Pittsburgh, PA: Springer; 2006.
- Opricovic S, Tzeng GH. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 2004;156:445-55.