Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Machine Learning approach for Quality of Experience aware networks

2010, Intelligent Networking and …

https://doi.org/10.1109/INCOS.2010.86

Abstract

Efficient management of multimedia services necessitates the understanding of how the quality of these services is perceived by the users. Estimation of the perceived quality or Quality of Experience (QoE) of the service is a challenging process due to the subjective nature of QoE. This process usually incorporates complex subjective studies that need to recreate the viewing conditions of the service in a controlled environment. In this paper we present Machine Learning techniques for modeling the dependencies of different network and application layer quality of service parameters to the QoE of network services using subjective quality feedback. These accurate QoE prediction models allow us to further develop a geometrical method for calculating the possible remedies per network stream for reaching the desired level of QoE. Finally we present a set of possible network techniques that can deliver the desired improvement to the multimedia streams.

References (17)

  1. R. Jain, "Quality of experience," IEEE Multimedia, vol. 11, 2004, pp. 96-95.
  2. S. Winkler and P. Mohandas, "The Evolution of Video Quality Measurement: From PSNR to Hybrid Metrics," Broadcasting, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 54, 2008, pp. 660-668.
  3. S. Winkler, "Video Quality Measurement Standards -Current Status and Trends," Proceedings of ICICS 2009, Macau, PRC: 2009.
  4. A. Takahashi, D. Hands, and V. Barriac, "Standardization activities in the ITU for a QoE assessment of IPTV," Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 46, 2008, pp. 78-84.
  5. S. Winkler, Video Quality and Beyond, Symmetricom, 2007.
  6. M. Siller and J. Woods, "QoS arbitration for improving the QoE in multimedia transmission," Visual Information Engineering, 2003. VIE 2003. International Conference on, 2003, pp. 238-241.
  7. R.I. ITU-T, "910," Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications, 1999.
  8. F. Agboma and A. Liotta, "Addressing user expectations in mobile content delivery," Mobile Information Systems, vol. 3, Jan. 2007, pp. 153-164.
  9. F. Agboma and A. Liotta, "QoE-aware QoS management," Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, Linz, Austria: ACM, 2008, pp. 111-116.
  10. G.T. Fechner, E.G. Boring, H.E. Adler, and D.H. Howes, Elements of psychophysics / Translated by Helmut E. Adler ; Edited by David H. Howes [and] Edwin G. Boring ; with an introd. by Edwin G. Boring, New York :: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.
  11. W.R. Klecka, Discriminant analysis, SAGE, 1980.
  12. V. Menkovski, A. Oredope, A. Liotta, and A. Cuadra Sánchez, "Predicting Quality of Experience in Multimedia Streaming," Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 2009, pp. 52-59.
  13. J. Quinlan, "Induction of Decision Trees," Machine Learning, vol. 1, Mar. 1986, pp. 81-106.
  14. A.J. Smola and B. Sch\ölkopf, "A tutorial on support vector regression," Statistics and Computing, vol. 14, 2004, pp. 199-222.
  15. R. Kohavi, "A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection," International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES LTD, 1995, pp. 1137-1145.
  16. P. Domingos and G. Hulten, "Mining high-speed data streams," Proceedings of the sixth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 2000, pp. 71-80.
  17. R. Kirkby, "Improving Hoeffding Trees," Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato, 2007.