Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Executive Summary
Impact on Design and Quality
Big Data, Analytics, Visualisation
Leveraging Data
Conclusion
References
All Topics
Business and Management
Other Business

The Digital Shipyard Opportunities and Challenges

Profile image of Cecilia MorettiCecilia Moretti

2021

Related papers

The automation and integration of production processes in shipbuilding
F. Andritsos

… Commission, Joint Research Center, Institut for …, 2000

Maritime sector has been and will continue to be of strategic importance for Europe, due to the nature of its economy, topology, history and tradition [3]. Shipbuilding is a key maritime industry which has contributed significantly to Europe's maritime past and which is strategic for its ...

View PDFchevron_right
Paper 15: Developing a Digital Twin and Digital Thread Framework for an 'Industry 4.0' Shipyard
Ahmed Ghowel

This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY

View PDFchevron_right
Navantia’s Shipyard 4.0 model overview
Manuel Ángel Recamán Rivas

Ciencia y tecnología de buques, 2018

Navantia finished the analysis of the concept Industry 4.0 in 2016 and its application to the naval shipbuilding industry, referred to herein as Shipyard 4.0. The implementation process has begun with several projects that involved various technologies. In order to incorporate them in the new project, for naval vessels and systems, special focus has been put in the future F-110 frigate.This document aims to provide an overview of the Shipyard 4.0 model and a brief discussion regarding the projects launched for its implementation in Navantia. The initiative 4.0 is a key development vector across all the industrial sectors in the future and its expected outcomes match the ones established by the Government of Colombia in its “Plan de Transformación Industrial” (Plan of Industrial Transformation). In this context, the new frigate program (PES) is a unique opportunity to engage the local industry, in which Navantia offers its willingness to cooperate.

View PDFchevron_right
Developing a Digital Twin and Digital Thread Framework for an ‘Industry 4.0’ Shipyard
Toh Pang

2020

This paper provides an overview of the current state-of-the-art digital twin and digital thread technology in industrial operations. Both are transformational technologies that have the advantage of improving the efficiency of current design and manufacturing. Digital twin is an important element of the Industry 4.0 digitalization process; however, the huge amount of data that are generated and collected by digital twin offer challenges in handling, processing and storage. The paper aims to report on the development of a new framework that combines the digital twin and digital thread for better data management in order to drive innovation, improve the production process and performance, and to ensure continuity and traceability of information. The digital twin/thread framework incorporated behavior simulation and physical control components, in which these two components rely on the connectivity between the twin and thread for information flow and exchange to drive innovation. The t...

View PDFchevron_right
Paper2: Can a shipyard work towards lean shipbuilding or agile manufacturing
Ahmed Ghowel

Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), 2011

Lean production is regarded by many as simply an enhancement of mass production methods, whereas agility implies breaking out of the mass-production mould and producing much more highly customized products - where the customer wants them in any quantity. In a product line context, it amounts to striving for economies of scope, rather than economies of scale ideally serving ever-smaller niche markets, even quantities of one, without the high cost traditionally associated with customization. A lean company may be thought of as a very productive and cost efficient producer of goods or services.

View PDFchevron_right
Technology Survey of U.S. Shipyards—1994
Thomas Lamb

Journal of Ship Production, 1995

This paper reports on the results of a study of the international competitiveness of the U.S. shipbuilding industry. It describes the results of a detailed technology survey of five U.S. and five overseas shipyards. It then discusses the relative levels of technology application by the U.S. and overseas industries. A detailed competitive analysis is then presented. Finally, specific areas for improvement needed by the U.S. industry are recommended.

View PDFchevron_right
The National Shipbuilding Research Program, 1992 Ship Production Symposium Proceedings, Paper No. 2B-1: Computer-Integrated Manufacturing - A Perspective
Robert Llatorre

1992

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

View PDFchevron_right
Spring 2008 Industry Study Final Report Shipbuilding Industry
Juraj Sipko

2008

A robust US shipbuilding industry remains vital to our national security. At present, the government sector of the US industry can meet the current and projected national security needs. Further, the US commercial sector, while protected from foreign competition by legislation, provides some risk reduction benefit in the national security realm as well. Both sectors are challenged however by the shortage of skilled workers, a problem that is only expected to worsen and specific recommendations are provided within the body of the paper to address this workforce issue. The government sector is also challenged by a Navy shipbuilding plan that is caught in a paradigm where it is seeking increases in the number of ships and the complexity of the ships being procured, while operating in a budget constrained environment. These challenges are also addressed within the body of the paper and focus on stabilizing the Navy's shipbuilding plan and improving program execution.

View PDFchevron_right
Maritime 4.0 – Opportunities in Digitalization and Advanced Manufacturing for Vessel Development
Monica Rossi

Procedia Manufacturing, 2020

Maritime vessels are complex systems that generate and require the utilization of large amounts of data for maximum efficiency. The successful utilization of sensors and IoT in the industry requires a forward-thinking approach to leverage the benefits of Industry 4.0 in a more comprehensive manner. While processes and manufacturing processes can be improved and advanced through such efforts, in order the industry to be able to benefit from data generation, integrated approaches are necessary. In order to develop truly value-added vessels, we introduce a descriptive approach for understanding Maritime 4.0.

View PDFchevron_right
Shipbuilding 4.0 Index Approaching Supply Chain
Moises Deguchi Batista

Materials, 2019

The shipbuilding industry shows a special interest in adapting to the changes proposed by the industry 4.0. This article bets on the development of an index that indicates the current situation considering that supply chain is a key factor in any type of change, and at the same time it serves as a control tool in the implementation of improvements. The proposed indices provide a first definition of the paradigm or paradigms that best fit the supply chain in order to improve its sustainability and a second definition, regarding the key enabling technologies for Industry 4.0. The values obtained put shipbuilding on the road to industry 4.0 while suggesting categorized planning of technologies.

View PDFchevron_right

References (67)

  1. Systems. (2020). We've 3D Printed over 500,000 highly-complicated Metal parts, so you don't have to. Retrieved from https://www.3dsystems.com/3d-printers/dmp-flex-350
  2. 2017). How to Make Metal Parts. Retrieved from https://www.3deo.co/manufacturing/how-to- make-metal-parts-2/
  3. Ash, B. (2018). Digital shipyard sounds great but what is it? Retrieved from Australia: https://www.dxc.technology/au/insights/145714- digital_shipyard_sounds_great_but_what_is_it
  4. Balasingham, K. (2016). Industry 4.0: securing the future for German manufacturing companies. University of Twente, Bandyopadhyay, T., Steindl, R., Talbot, F., Kottege, N., Dungavell, R., Wood, B., . . . Elfes, A. (2018). Magneto: A versatile multi-limbed inspection robot. Paper presented at the 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).
  5. Benarroche, A. (2020). Construction Document Management Presents Unique Challenges. Retrieved from https://www.levelset.com/blog/construction-document-management/
  6. Bikakis, N. (2018). Big data visualization tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.08336.
  7. Bock, T. (2015). The future of construction automation: Technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics. Automation in Construction, 113-121.
  8. Boschert, S., & Rosen, R. (2016). Digital twin-the simulation aspect. In Mechatronic futures (pp. 59- 74): Springer.
  9. BostonDynamics. (2020a). APPLICATIONS. Retrieved from https://www.bostondynamics.com/spot/applications
  10. BostonDynamics. (2020b). Unlocking jobsite data with Spot. Retrieved from https://www.bostondynamics.com/11-19-2019#scanning
  11. Castro-Lacouture, D. (2009). Construction automation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. Casun. (2020). Laser Guided Unmanned Forklift , AGV Pallet Truck For Loading Materials. Retrieved from http://www.agvrobotor.com/sale-10985772-laser-guided-unmanned-forklift-agv-pallet- truck-for-loading-materials.html
  12. Cherubini, A., Passama, R., Crosnier, A., Lasnier, A., & Fraisse, P. (2016). Collaborative manufacturing with physical human-robot interaction. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 40, 1-13.
  13. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 354-363.
  14. CISION. (2018). 3D Systems and Huntington Ingalls Industries Partner to Transform U.S. Navy Shipbuilding. Retrieved from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/3d-systems-and- huntington-ingalls-industries-partner-to-transform-us-navy-shipbuilding-300645772.html
  15. Clark, J. (2019). Evolution of AGVs -What's Available and What's to Come? Retrieved from https://www.mapyourshow.com/mys_shared/packexpo17/handouts/Dematic1.pdf
  16. Conveyco (Producer). (2019). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs). Retrieved from https://www.conveyco.com/advantages-disadvantages-automated- guided-vehicles-agvs/ CSIRO. (2020). CSIRO Annual Report 2019 -2020. Retrieved from https://www.csiro.au/~/media/About/AnnualReport/Files/2019-20/20- 00135_CORP_AnnualReport2019- 20_WEB_201012.pdf?la=en&hash=8D900A051F972347208E66FBDDE8EC895175867C
  17. Culot, G., Fattori, F., Podrecca, M., & Sartor, M. (2019). Addressing Industry 4.0 cybersecurity challenges. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47(3), 79-86.
  18. Daniel, K., Kuhlmann, K., Köcher, S., Dauner, T., & Burggraaff, P. (2016). The Factory of the Future. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/en-au/publications/2016/leaning-manufacturing- operations-factory-of-future
  19. Depositphotos. (2020). Forklift. Retrieved from https://depositphotos.com/stock-photos/forklift.html DNV-GL. (2020). Additive manufacturing/3D printing. Retrieved from https://www.dnvgl.com/services/additive-manufacturing-3d-printing-110872
  20. DSME. (2020). DSME Corporate PR film opinionleader. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfUoVHins2A AITI (2021)
  21. DXC.technology. (2020). Digital twins revolutionize shipbuilding. Retrieved from https://www.dxc.technology/aerospace_defense/insights/146602- digital_twins_revolutionize_shipbuilding
  22. Eliasson, G. (2010). Advanced public procurement as industrial policy: The aircraft industry as a technical university (Vol. 34): Springer Science & Business Media.
  23. Flyability. (2020). Confined Spaces Inspection. Retrieved from https://www.flyability.com/articles-and- media/confined-spaces-inspection
  24. Gekara, V., Snell, D., Molla, A., Karanasios, S., & Thomas, A. (2019). Skilling the Australian Workforce for the Digital Economy. Research Report. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).
  25. Gobble, M. M. (2018). Digital strategy and digital transformation. Research-Technology Management, 61(5), 66-71.
  26. Gourdon, K., & Steidl, C. (2019). Global value chains and the shipbuilding industry. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/global-value-chains-and-the- shipbuilding-industry_7e94709a-en
  27. Gu, X., Jin, X., Ni, J., & Koren, Y. (2015). Manufacturing System Design for Resilience. Procedia CIRP, 36, 135-140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.075
  28. Harmon, R. R., Corno, F., & Castro-Leon, E. G. (2015). Smart Systems. IT Professional, 17(6), 14-17. doi:10.1109/MITP.2015.115
  29. Hordacre, A.-L., Spoehr, J., & Barnett, K. (2017). Creative solutions. creativity, innovation and sustainable jobs in South Australia. Retrieved from IBM Internet of Things. (2017). Introduction to Digital Twin: Simple, but detailed. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaOejcczPas
  30. Ingram, K. (2019). Achieving Digital Shipyard Success -ERP Holds the Key Retrieved from https://www.maritime-executive.com/blog/achieving-digital-shipyard-success-erp-holds-the- key. Retrieved 02-01-2021 https://www.maritime-executive.com/blog/achieving-digital- shipyard-success-erp-holds-the-key
  31. Inrotech. (2020). Inrotech-Classic. Retrieved from https://www.inrotech.com/inrotech-classic ISO. (2014). ISO 13482 Robots and robotic devices-Safety requirements for personal care robots. In: International Standards Organization.
  32. Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577-586.
  33. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Retrieved from
  34. Kane, G., C, Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. Becoming a digitally mature enterprise. Findings from the 2015 Digital Business Global Executive Study and Research Project. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/cn/en/pages/technology-media-and- telecommunications/articles/strategy-not-technology-drives-digital-transformation.html
  35. King, A. (2019). Upskilling to meet the demands of industry 4.0. Retrieved from https://www.rmit.edu.au/news/c4de/upskilling-to-meet-the-demands-of-industry-4-0
  36. Knoke, B., & Thoben, K.-D. (2017). Integration of Simulation-based Training for Welders. Simul. Notes Eur., 27(1), 37-44.
  37. Lichtblau, K., Stich, V., Bertenrath, R., Blum, M., Bleider, M., Millack, A., . . . Schröter, M. (2015). IMPULS-industrie 4.0-readiness. Impuls-Stiftung des VDMA, Aachen-Köln.
  38. Liere-Netheler, K., Packmohr, S., & Vogelsang, K. (2018). Drivers of Digital Transformation in Manufacturing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
  39. Loveder, P. (2017). Australian Apprenticeships: Trends, Challenges and Future Opportunities for Dealing with Industry 4.0. Conference Paper. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).
  40. Maharjan, R. (2019). Semi-Automatic Robot Pipe Welding System.
  41. Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Barta, P., . . . Sanghvi, S. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. Retrieved from Massa, L., & Tucci, C. L. (2014). The Oxford handbook of innovation management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  42. Matsas, E., & Vosniakos, G.-C. (2017). Design of a virtual reality training system for human-robot collaboration in manufacturing tasks. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 11(2), 139-153.
  43. Mazzucato, M., Kattel, R., & Ryan-Collins, J. (2020). Challenge-driven innovation policy: towards a new policy toolkit. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20(2), 421-437.
  44. McKinsey & Company. (2015). Industry 4.0. How to navigate digitization of the manufacturing sector. Retrieved from Melo, S. (2019). 7 Benefits of using digital work orders. Retrieved from https://mydatascope.com/blog/en/7-benefits-of-using-digital-work-orders/
  45. Michaud, P. (2018). The potential for digitalization in the shipbuilding industry. Retrieved from https://prostep.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/PROSTEP-INC-Whitepaper-Shipbuilding- EN.pdf Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Shaikh, M. A. A. (2018). Assessing challenges for implementing Industry 4.0: Implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 730-741.
  46. Müller, J. M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K.-I. (2018). Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 2-17.
  47. Muller, J. M., Kiel, D., & Voigt, K.-I. (2018). What drives the implementation of Industry 4.0? The role of opportunities and challenges in the context of sustainability. Sustainability, 10, 247-269. doi:10.3390/su10010247
  48. Network, C. (2019). Creating the Future Through Innovation. Retrieved from https://catapult.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Catapult-Network-Impact-Brochure-2020- FINAL.pdf
  49. Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T., & Hui, D. (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, 172-196.
  50. OC Robotics. (2020). Snake-arm Robots. Retrieved from http://www.ocrobotics.com/technology- /snakearm-robots/
  51. Paasi, J., Luoma, T., Valkokari, K., & Lee, N. (2010). Knowledge and intellectual property management in customer-supplier relationships. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(04), 629-654.
  52. Rolls Royce. (2018). Swarm robots. Retrieved from https://www.rolls-royce.com/media/our- stories/insights/2018/swarm-robots.aspx
  53. Sánchez-Sotano, A., Cerezo-Narváez, A., Abad-Fraga, F., Pastor-Fernández, A., & Salguero-Gómez, J. (Producer). (2020a). Trends of Digital Transformation in the Shipbuilding Sector. Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/books/new-trends-in-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-for-the- industry-4-0/trends-of-digital-transformation-in-the-shipbuilding-sector
  54. Sánchez-Sotano, A., Cerezo-Narváez, A., Abad-Fraga, F., Pastor-Fernández, A., & Salguero-Gómez, J. (2020b). Trends of Digital Transformation in the Shipbuilding Sector. In New Trends in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Industry 4.0 (pp. 3): IntechOpen.
  55. Schroder, C. (2016). The Challenges of Industry 4.0 for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Retrieved from Bonn, Germany:
  56. Schwab, W., & Poujol, M. (2018). The state of industrial cybersecurity 2018. Trend Study Kaspersky Reports, 33.
  57. Seet, P.-S., Jones, J., Spoehr, J., & Hordacre, A.-L. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution - Implications of Technological Disruption for Australian VET. Retrieved from Singh, R. (2018). Augmented Reality In Corporate Training: Should You Wait Or Adopt Now? Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/augmented-reality-in-corporate-training-wait-or- adopt-now
  58. Sinha, P. R., Whitman, L. E., & Malzahn, D. (2004). Methodology to mitigate supplier risk in an aerospace supply chain. Supply Chain Management: an international journal.
  59. Smith, R., Self, M., & Cheeseman, P. (1990). Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics. In Autonomous robot vehicles (pp. 167-193): Springer.
  60. Standford. (2020). Digital Twin for Construction. Retrieved from https://cife.stanford.edu/Seed2019%20DigitalTwin
  61. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range planning, 43(2- 3), 172-194.
  62. Thomassen, C. (2019). Selecting ERP For The Digital Shipyard Retrieved from https://image.engineering.com/239575/articles/July+2019/engineering.com+- +IFS_White+paper_Selecting+ERP+for+the+Digital+Shipyard.PDF
  63. Torres Saenz, A. (2018). Identifying Challenges and success factors towards Implementing Industry 4.0 technologies in the Shipbuilding Industry.
  64. Ullrich, G. (2015). The history of automated guided vehicle systems. In Automated Guided Vehicle Systems (pp. 1-14): Springer.
  65. VREDDO. (2020). Better results minus logistical and safety risks. Retrieved from https://vreddo.com/training-labs-risk- safety/?gclid=CjwKCAjwkoz7BRBPEiwAeKw3q8aZjdzIo3tMwfx65oZuR0Ns4EJYUhGc6S3XV Ef30swVf1kI0yBlPhoC3nIQAvD_BwE
  66. Wang, L., Törngren, M., & Onori, M. (2015). Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 517-527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.008
  67. Zhou, F., Lin, X., Liu, C., Zhao, Y., Xu, P., Ren, L., . . . Ren, L. (2019). A survey of visualization for smart manufacturing. Journal of Visualization, 22(2), 419-435.

Related papers

Robotics and the Digital Shipyard
Konstantinos Manning

2022

For Australia to achieve its goals for long-term productivity growth and global competitiveness in manufacturing, it needs to accelerate pursuit of the Industry 4.0 (i4.0) agenda driving the transformation of manufacturing globally. I4.0 is a strategy that seeks to modernise and transform manufacturing through accelerating uptake and diffusion of advanced manufacturing technologies and processes in tandem with comprehensive enterprise digitalisation. It seeks to drive a new wave of productivity, efficiency, flexibility, environmental, safety and working life improvements that underpin the growth of high value, high skill manufacturing. This report reviews the ‘current state’ of robotics applications in Australian manufacturing to inform considerations about potential applications of the technologies in shipbuilding as part of the digital shipyard ambition. It details a range of use cases and illustrates how the adoption of modern robotics and assistive manufacturing technologies are helping companies to pursue the Industry 4.0 challenge in Australia.

View PDFchevron_right
Paper7: TOWARD SHIPBUILDING 4.0 -AN INDUSTRY 4.0 CHANGING THE FACE OF THE SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY
Ahmed Ghowel

The Shipbuilding 4.0 at the principles of the Industry 4.0 will transform the design, manufacturing, operation, shipping, services, production systems, maintenance and value chains in the all aspects of the shipbuilding industry. Over the last few years, the fourth industrial revolution has spread in almost all industries. The whole world is talking about Industry 4.0 which has increased implication in the manufacturing process and the future of the work. The impact of the Shipbuilding 4.0 will be significant. In the past, shipbuilding industry where continuously improved with new machines, software and new implemented organizational restructuring. In today shipbuilding industry, there are three main problems that are considered; production efficiency, the ship safety, cost efficiency and energy conservation and environmental protection. In order to create new value, the ship must become a Smart Ship capable of "thinking", and to be produced in Smart Shipbuilding Process. The aim of this article is a review of the present academic and industrial progress of this new industrial revolution wave in the shipbuilding sector called Shipbuilding 4.0 (Shipping 4.0, Maritime 4.0, Shipyard 4.0). Reviewed publications were analyzed different topics and level of improvements in the industrial aspects of the society. The implementation of the Shipbuilding 4.0 in the shipbuilding industry, presents the future, creating new value in the process, creating new demands with reduction in production and operational cost while increasing production efficiency.

View PDFchevron_right
Paper 21: Toward Shipbuilding 4.0 - an Industry 4.0 Changing the Face of the Shipbuilding Industry
Ahmed Ghowel

Brodogradnja, 2018

The Shipbuilding 4.0 at the principles of the Industry 4.0 will transform the design, manufacturing, operation, shipping, services, production systems, maintenance and value chains in the all aspects of the shipbuilding industry. Over the last few years, the fourth industrial revolution has spread in almost all industries. The whole world is talking about Industry 4.0 which has increased implication in the manufacturing process and the future of the work. The impact of the Shipbuilding 4.0 will be significant. In the past, shipbuilding industry where continuously improved with new machines, software and new implemented organizational restructuring. In today shipbuilding industry, there are three main problems that are considered; production efficiency, the ship safety, cost efficiency and energy conservation and environmental protection. In order to create new value, the ship must become a Smart Ship capable of "thinking", and to be produced in Smart Shipbuilding Process. The aim of this article is a review of the present academic and industrial progress of this new industrial revolution wave in the shipbuilding sector called Shipbuilding 4.0 (Shipping 4.0, Maritime 4.0, Shipyard 4.0). Reviewed publications were analyzed different topics and level of improvements in the industrial aspects of the society. The implementation of the Shipbuilding 4.0 in the shipbuilding industry, presents the future, creating new value in the process, creating new demands with reduction in production and operational cost while increasing production efficiency.

View PDFchevron_right
Toward Shipbuilding 4.0 - an Industry 4.0 Changing the Face of the Shipbuilding Industry
Venesa Stanic

Brodogradnja, 2018

The Shipbuilding 4.0 at the principles of the Industry 4.0 will transform the design, manufacturing, operation, shipping, services, production systems, maintenance and value chains in the all aspects of the shipbuilding industry. Over the last few years, the fourth industrial revolution has spread in almost all industries. The whole world is talking about Industry 4.0 which has increased implication in the manufacturing process and the future of the work. The impact of the Shipbuilding 4.0 will be significant. In the past, shipbuilding industry where continuously improved with new machines, software and new implemented organizational restructuring. In today shipbuilding industry, there are three main problems that are considered; production efficiency, the ship safety, cost efficiency and energy conservation and environmental protection. In order to create new value, the ship must become a Smart Ship capable of "thinking", and to be produced in Smart Shipbuilding Process. The aim of this article is a review of the present academic and industrial progress of this new industrial revolution wave in the shipbuilding sector called Shipbuilding 4.0 (Shipping 4.0, Maritime 4.0, Shipyard 4.0). Reviewed publications were analyzed different topics and level of improvements in the industrial aspects of the society. The implementation of the Shipbuilding 4.0 in the shipbuilding industry, presents the future, creating new value in the process, creating new demands with reduction in production and operational cost while increasing production efficiency.

View PDFchevron_right
Trends of Digital Transformation in the Shipbuilding Sector
Andrés Pastor Fernández

New Trends in the Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Industry 4.0

The new paradigms of Industry 4.0 force all the industrial sectors to face a deep digital transformation in order to be on the edge in a competitive and globalized scenario. Following this trend, the shipbuilding industry has to establish its own path to adapt itself to the digital era. This chapter aims to explore this challenge and give an outlook on the multiple transformative technologies that are involved. For that reason, a case of study is presented as a starting point, in which the digital technologies that can be applied are easily recognized. A social network analysis (SNA) is developed among these key enabling technologies (KETs), in order to stress their correlations and links. As a result, artificial intelligence (AI) can be highlighted as a support to the other technologies, such as vertical integration of naval production systems (e.g., connectivity, Internet of things, collaborative robotics, etc.), horizontal integration of value networks (e.g., cybersecurity, diversification, etc.), and life cycle reengineering (e.g., drones, 3D printing (3DP), virtual and augmented reality, remote sensing networks, robotics, etc.).

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Australian Manufacturing
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved