Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of the Verb 'Perigar'
2025, Fórum Linguístico
https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2025.E97333Abstract
‘Perigar’ is a verb that appears in several constructions of Brazilian Portuguese (BP), such as in ‘periga chover’, and its grammatical features were not yet described. In order to fill this gap, we provide a syntactic description following syntactic cartography (Cinque, 1999, 2006; Cinque; Rizzi, 2008; Drubig, 2001; Tsai, 2015) and a semantic description following formal semantics (Kratzer, 1981, 1991; Condoravdi, 2002; von Fintel, 2006; von Fintel; Heim, 2011; Hacquard, 2011). To provide such a description, we have adopted two methodological procedures: (i) collecting and analyzing spontaneous data from Facebook and (ii) applying syntactic and semantic tests using the introspective method. In the first step, we were able to get one hundred sentences with the verb ‘perigar’ which were analyzed syntactically and semantically in order to formulate some hypothesis about this verb. In order to test them, we have done some syntactic and semantic tests using the introspective method. The syntactic tests’ goal was to verify if it was an auxiliary modal verb or if it was a lexical verb. The semantic tests’ goal was to verify which aspects were lexicalized. The syntactic tests have shown that it can be considered an unaccusative lexical verb. On the other hand, the semantic tests have shown that it resembles modal verbs in some aspects since it takes only a proposition as an argument and has an existential quantification force, but it also resembles lexical verbs in some aspects since the modal base is lexicalized in the verb.
References (24)
- ordering of the functional heads in (23) shows that the epistemic head is above TP(Past) and, due to this reason, it cannot be inflected for tense. On the other hand, there is no problem for lexical verbs to be inflected for tense since they are below TP(Past), as it is the case for 'perigar'. Note that there is not, in the functional head hierarchy, a position below TP(Past) for an epistemic functional head and this suggests that the verb 'perigar' is not a functional item, but a lexical verb. We have also tested the kind of complements the verb 'perigar' can take. In our tests and in the spontaneous data, we observed that it can occur with either an InfP or a CP, as illustrated in (24); differing from the functional modal verb 'poder' (can/may), that occurs only with an InfP, as illustrated in (25). (24) a. Periga [InfP eu levar vaia.]
- Periga.PRS.IND [InfP 1.SG take.INF boo.]
- Periga.PRS.IND [CP that 1.SG take.INF boo.] 'It is possible that I will get booed.'
- SG may.PRS.IND [CP that 1.SG take.INF boo.]
- 'I may get booed.' An InfP may be under the scope of lexical verbs or functional verbs, but CPs can only occur in the scope of a lexical verb. 6 Thus, the grammaticality of (24b) shows that the verb 'perigar' behaves as a lexical verb, since only lexical verbs take CPs as its arguments. The ungrammaticality of (25b) shows that the auxiliary verb 'poder' (may/can) does not admit CP in this position, as expected from a functional predicate. It is important to point out that, although the verb 'perigar' can take as a complement both InfP and CP, our spontaneous data suggest that the complementation with InfP is preferred as illustrated in the graph below.
- REFERENCES CINQUE, G.; RIZZI, L. The cartography of syntactic structures. STiL: Studies in Linguistics (CISCL Working Papers), [s.l.], v. 2, p. 42-58, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285969382_The_Cartography_of_Syntactic_Structures. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025.
- CINQUE, G. Restructuring and functional heads: the cartography of syntactic structures. v. 4. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. CINQUE, G. Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
- DRUBIG, H. B. On the syntactic form of epistemic modality. Tübingen: Universiy of Tübingen, 2001. Disponível em https://pt.scribd.com/document/169482975/On-the-syntactic-form-of-episte-Hans-Bernhard-Drubig-pdf. Acesso em 10 out. 2023. DEARMAS, J. V. Modality and counterfactuality in 'vai que' type sentences. Pôster apresentado no XIII Romania Nova, Florianópolis, 2024.
- FERREIRA, L. F.; RECH, N. F. The verbal construction 'vai que' in Brazilian Portuguese. Trabalho apresentado no XIV Workshop on Formal Linguistics, Rio de Janeiro, 2024.
- FERREIRA, M. Alçamento temporal em complementos infinitivos do português. Caderno de Estudos Linguísticos, Campinas, v. 62, p. 1-19, 2020. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8655883. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025. HACQUARD, V. Modality. In: VON HEUSINGER, K.; MAIENBORN, C.; PORTNER, P. (ed.). Semantics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011. p. 1484-1515. Disponível em: https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110255072.1484/html. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2024
- KRATZER, A. What 'must' and 'can'must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, Dordrecht, v. 1, n. 3, p. 337-355, 1977. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25000968. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2025.
- KRATZER, A. Modality. In: VON STECHOW, A; WUNDERLICH, D. (ed.). Semantik/Semantics: ein internationales handbuch zeitgenössischer forschung. Berlin,New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 1991. p. 639-650.
- LEWIS, D. On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.
- MARQUES, R. Sobre alguns modalizadores de frase epistêmicos e evidênciais. In: XXVII ENCONTRO NACIONAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO PORTUGUESA DE LINGUÍSTICA, 17., 2012, Lisboa. Textos [...]. Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 2012. p. 398-415. Disponível em: https://apl.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/21_Marques.pdf. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2025.
- MENDES, J. V. Interações modal-temporais no português brasileiro. 2019. 121 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras) -Programa de Pós-Graduação em Semiótica e Linguística Geral, Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8139/tde-21052019-125303/pt-br.php. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025.
- PESSOTTO, A. L. 'Pode' e 'podia': uma proposta semântico-pragmática. Revista da ABRALIN, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 11-41, jul./dez. 2011. Disponível em: https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1053. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025.
- PESSOTTO, A. L. Epistemic and Gradable Modality in Brazilian Portuguese: a comparative analysis of 'poder', 'dever' and 'ter que'. ReVEL: Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 8, p. 49-75, 2014. Edição especial. Disponível em: https://www.revel.inf.br/pt/edicoes/?id=35. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025.
- PESSOTTO, A. L. Força e evidência: uma análise teórico experimental da semântica de 'pode', 'deve' e 'tem que'. 2015. 275 f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) -Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2015. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/handle/123456789/135484. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025.
- PIRES DE OLIVEIRA, R.; SCARDUELLI, J. A. Explicando as diferenças semânticas entre <i>ter que</i> e <i>dever</i>: uma proposta em semântica de mundos possíveis. ALFA: Revista de Linguística, São Paulo, v. 52, n. 1, p. 215-234, 2009. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1476. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025.
- PIRES DE OLIVEIRA, R.; PESSOTTO, A. L. Wishing it were: podia and the implicature of desire in Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of SULA V -Semantics of Underrepresented Languages in Americas. Amherst: GLSA, 2010. p. 189-204.
- RECH, N. S. F. O processo de auxiliaridade verbal no português brasileiro: uma análise dos modais poder, dever e ter de/que. Working Papers em Linguística, Florianópolis, v. 11, n. 2, p. 37-51, 2011. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/workingpapers/article/view/1984-8420.2010v11n2p37. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025.
- RESENDE, M.; RECH, N. F. Uma análise para os adjetivos em -vel à luz da morfologia distribuída. ALFA: Revista de Linguística, São Paulo, v. 64, p. 1-21, 2020. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/11739. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025.
- RECH, N. S. F.; GIACHIN, A. S. As interpretações disponíveis para os modais 'pode' e 'deve' em construções com predicados adjetivais. ReVEL: Revista Virtual de Estudos da Linguagem, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 8, p. 21-49, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.revel.inf.br/files/b70827bd00a000d501b09d5e95d22211.pdf. Acesso em: 09 abr. 2025.
- RIZZI, L.; BOCCI, G. Left periphery of the clause: primarily illustrated for italian. In: EVERAERT, M.; VAN RIEMSDIJK, H. C. (ed.). The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax. 2. ed. Nova Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2017. p. 579-638.