Costs and benefits linked to developments in cognitive control
2013, Developmental Science
https://doi.org/10.1111/DESC.12113Abstract
Developing cognitive control over one's thoughts, emotions, and actions is a fundamental process that predicts important life outcomes. Such control begins in infancy, and shifts during development from a predominantly reactive form (e.g. retrieving task-relevant information when needed) to an increasingly proactive form (e.g. maintaining task-relevant information in anticipation of needing it). While such developments are generally viewed as adaptive, cognitive abilities can also involve tradeoffs, such that the benefits of developing increasingly proactive control may come with associated costs. In two experiments, we test for such cognitive trade-offs in children who are transitioning to proactive control. We find that proactive control predicts expected benefits in children's working memory, but is also associated with predicted costs in disproportionately slowing children under conditions of distraction. These findings highlight unique advantages and disadvantages of proactive and reactive control, and suggest caution in attempting to alter their balance during development.
References (35)
- Anderson MC, Green C. Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control. Nature. 2001; 410:366-369. [PubMed: 11268212]
- Barkley RA. Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin. 1997; 121:65-94. [PubMed: 9000892]
- Blackwell KA, Cepeda NJ, Munakata Y. When simple things are meaningful: working memory strength predicts children's cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2009; 103:241-249. [PubMed: 19278688]
- Braver TS. The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual-mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2012; 16:106-113. [PubMed: 22245618]
- Braver, TS.; Gray, JR.; Burgess, GC. Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In: Conway, A.; Jarrold, C.; Kane, M.; Miyake, A.; Towse, J., editors. Variation in working memory. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 2007. p. 76-106.
- Braver TS, Paxton JL, Locke HS, Barch DM. Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2009; 106:7351- 7356.
- Bunge S, Zelazo P. A brain-based account of the development of rule use in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2006; 15:118-121.
- Carlson S. Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children. Developmental Neurospsychology. 2005; 28:595-616.
- Cepeda NJ, Blackwell KA, Munakata Y. Speed isn't everything: complex processing speed measures mask individual differences and developmental changes in executive control. Developmental Science. 2013; 16:269-286. [PubMed: 23432836]
- Chatham CH, Frank MJ, Munakata Y. Pupil-lometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2009; 106:5529-5533.
- Chatham CH, Provan L, Munakata Y. An intermediate phase in the transition from reactive to proactive cognitive control. 2013 Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Chelonis JJ, Daniels-Shaw JL, Blake DJ, Paule MG. Developmental aspects of delayed matching-to- sample task performance in children. Neurotoxicology and Teratology. 2000; 22:683-694. [PubMed: 11106861]
- Chevalier N, Curran T, Munakata Y. Proactive control can be encouraged during childhood. (in preparation).
- Cohen, JD.; Lewis-Peacock, JA.; Norman, KA. Neural evidence for the flexible use of working memory and episodic memory in prospective remembering. Poster presented at the Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting; New Orleans, LA. Oct. 2012
- Deák, GO. The development of cognitive flexibility and language abilities. In: Kail, R., editor. Advances in child development and behavior. Vol. Vol. 31. Academic Press; San Diego, CA: 2003. p. 271-327.
- Diamond A. Activities and programs that improve children's executive functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2012; 21:335-341.
- Doll BB, Hutchison KE, Frank MJ. Dopaminergic genes predict individual differences in susceptibility to confirmation bias. Journal of Neuroscience. 2011; 31:6188-6198. [PubMed: 21508242]
- Fisher AV, Thiessen ED, Godwin KE, Kloos H, Dickerson JP. Assessing selective sustained attention in 3-to 5-year-old children: evidence from a new paradigm. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2013; 114:275-294. [PubMed: 23022318]
- Friedman NP, Haberstick BC, Willcutt EG, Miyake A, Young SE, Corley RP, Hewitt JK. Greater attention problems during childhood predict poorer executive functions in late adolescence. Psychological Science. 2007; 18:893-900. [PubMed: 17894607]
- Friedman NP, Miyake A. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent- variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2004; 133:101-135. [PubMed: 14979754]
- Friedman NP, Miyake A, Robinson JL, Hewitt JK. Developmental trajectories in toddlers' self- restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: a behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology. 2011; 47:1410-1430. [PubMed: 21668099]
- Friedman NP, Miyake A, Young SE, Defries JC, Corley RP, Hewitt JK. Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2008; 137:201-225. [PubMed: 18473654]
- Goschke, T. Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In: Monsell, S.; Driver, J., editors. Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes in attention, memory and language. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA: 2000. p. 331-335.
- Kharitonova M, Chien S, Colunga E, Munakata Y. More than a matter of getting 'unstuck': flexible thinkers use more abstract representations than perseverators. Developmental Science. 2009; 12:662-669. [PubMed: 19635091]
- Kharitonova M, Munakata Y. The role of representations in executive function: investigating a developmental link between flexibility and abstraction. Frontiers in Psychology. 2011; 2:347. [PubMed: 22144971]
- Lesh TA, Niendam TA, Minzenberg MJ, Carter CS. Cognitive control deficits in schizophrenia: mechanisms and meaning. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011; 36:316-338. [PubMed: 20844478]
- Locke HS, Braver TS. Motivational influences on cognitive control: behavior, brain activation, and individual differences. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience. 2008; 8:99-112.
- Logan GD, Schachar RJ, Tannock R. Impulsivity and inhibtory control. Psychological Science. 1997; 8:60-64.
- Moffitt TE, Arseneault L, Belsky D, Dickson N, Hancox RJ, Harrington H-L, Houts R, Poulton R, Roberts RW, Ross S, Sears MR, Thomson WM, Caspi A. A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2011; 108:2693-2698.
- Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003; 7:134-140. [PubMed: 12639695]
- Munakata Y, Snyder HR, Chatham CH. Developing cognitive control: three key transitions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2012; 21:71-77. [PubMed: 22711982]
- Munakata, Y.; Snyder, HR.; Chatham, CH. Developing cognitive control: the costs and benefits of active, abstract representations. In: Zelazo, P.; Sera, M., editors. Developing cognitive control processes: Mechanisms, implications, and interventions. Wiley Press; Hillsdale, NJ: (in press)
- Thomspon-Schill SL, Ramscar M, Chrysikou EG. Cognition without control: when a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2009; 18:259-263. [PubMed: 20401341]
- Wager TD, Davidson ML, Hughes BL, Lindquist MA, Ochsner KN. Prefrontal-subcortical pathways mediating successful emotion regulation. Neuron. 2008; 59:1037-1050. [PubMed: 18817740]
- Zelazo PD, Frye D, Rapus T. An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them. Cognitive Development. 1996; 11:37-63.