Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Learning implicitly to produce avoided behaviours

2011, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.543283

Abstract

The literature on repetition processing reveals an intriguing paradox between the particular salience of repetitions, which makes them easy to learn, and a tendency to avoid them when generating sequences. The aim of this experiment was to study the extent to which children can learn to produce these avoided behaviours by means of an artificial grammar paradigm using generation tests with implicit or explicit instructions. The analysis of the control group's performance confirmed the presence of a spontaneous tendency to avoid generating repetitions. A comparison with chance revealed that the children learned to produce repetitions in the explicit test but not in the implicit test. However, a comparison with the control group showed that learning nonetheless occurred in the experimental group with the implicit test. The discussion focused on this antirepetition behavioural bias and how it interacted with the type of information processes elicited by the tests selected for assess...

References (29)

  1. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 183-193.
  2. Coetzee, A. (2005). The obligatory contour principle in the perception of English. In S. Frota, M. Vigario, & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Prosodies (pp. 223-245). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
  3. Dienes, Z., & Altmann, G. (2003). Measuring learning using an untrained control group: Comment on R. Reber and Perruchet. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A(1), 117-123.
  4. Dulany, D. E., Carlson, A., & Dewey, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How con- scious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541-555.
  5. Endress, A. D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Mehler, J. (2007). Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars. Cognition, 105, 577-614.
  6. Frith, U. (1972). Cognitive mechanisms in autism: Experiments with color and tone sequence production. Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia, 2, 160-173.
  7. Gomez, R. L., Gerken, L., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (2000). The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Memory and Cognition, 28, 253-263.
  8. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Item repetition in short-term memory: Ranschburg repeated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 1162-1181.
  9. Herzog, G. R. (1989). The subjective-randomness theory: Experiments on the conceptualization of the formation of random sequences. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 36, 199-220.
  10. Kingston, J., Chambless, D., Mash, D., Katz, J., Brenner, E., & Kawahara, S. (June, 2006). Sequential contrast and the perception of co-articulated segments. Poster presented at the 10th Conference on Laboratory Phonology, Paris, France.
  11. Lotz, A., & Kinder, A. (2006). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: The role of repetition infor- mation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 707-715.
  12. Marcus, G., Vijayan, S., Rao, S., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77-80.
  13. Mittenecker, E. (1958). Analysis of sequences of "chance" action. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 5, 45-60.
  14. Monaghan, P., & Rowson, C. (2008). The effect of rep- etition and similarity on sequence learning. Memory and Cognition, 36, 1509-1514.
  15. Perlman, A., & Tzelgov, J. (2006). Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence- learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 118-130.
  16. Perruchet, P., & Reber, R. (2003). Why untrained control groups provide invalid baselines: A reply to Dienes & Altmann. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 125-130.
  17. Rabinovitz, F. M., Dunlap, W. P., Grant, M. J., & Campione, J. C. (1989). The rules used by children and adults in attempting to generate random numbers. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 227-287.
  18. Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial gram- mars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855-863.
  19. Reber, R., & Perruchet, P. (2003). The use of control groups in artificial grammar learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 97-116.
  20. Richards, N. (2006). A distinctness condition on lineariza- tion. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA.
  21. Shanks, D. R. (2005). Implicit learning. In K. Lamberts & R. Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of cognition (pp. 202-220). London, UK: Sage.
  22. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. (1994). Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness. Brain and Behavior Science, 17, 367-447.
  23. Tunney, R. J., & Altmann, G. T. M. (1999). The transfer effect in artificial grammar learning: Re-appraising the evidence of transfer of sequential dependencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1322-1333.
  24. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
  25. Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (1999). Isolating uncon- scious influences: The neutral parameter procedure. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 857-875.
  27. Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (2000). Implicit learning in children is not related to age: Evidence from drawing behavior. Child Development, 71, 1223-1240.
  28. Vinter, A., & Perruchet, P. (2002). Implicit motor learning through observational training in adults and children. Memory & Cognition, 30, 256-261.
  29. Walter, M.-A. (2007). Repetition avoidance in human language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Wiegersma, S. (1982). A control theory of sequential response production. Psychological Research, 44, 175-188.