Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Chapter 1: Introduction
Background of the Study
The Importance of Studying Stem Faculty
Purpose and Research Questions
Significance of the Study
Limitations
Delimitations
Introduction
Summary
Data Analysis
Operating Procedures
Conclusions Conclusion One
Conclusion Four
Policy Recommendations
References
All Topics
Sociology
Sociology of Work

Factors affecting university STEM faculty job satisfaction

Profile image of Lisa Babin VerretLisa Babin Verret

2022

https://doi.org/10.31390/GRADSCHOOL_DISSERTATIONS.2478
visibility

…

description

126 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Special thanks to my parents, Kenneth and Gloria Babin, who supported me emotionally and financially. You have always been there for me no matter what my endeavor or circumstance. Mama and Daddy, I could never repay you for all you have done for me, Travis and the children. I am forever in your debt. Special thanks to my brother, Michael Babin, for always being there for me no matter what my request. Thanks to my uncle, Louis Bellina, for his support and encouragement during this journey. Special thanks to my aunt and uncle, Karen & Charles Radcliff, for their prayers and support. Thanks to "my girls", Alex Davis, Dana Sweeney, Rachelle Richard, Kacey Tambling, Shanna Lavin and Emily Souvinette for encouraging me and helping me stay focused while providing comic relief and entertainment so I would not completely lose my mind. Thanks to my wonderful step-children, Stormi and Shade, who always understood when I told them I could not watch a movie or play a game with them because I was working on my school stuff. You were my motivation for finishing this project so that I could be a good role model to you. I also wanted you to know that nothing is impossible if you set your mind to it, no matter what obstacles life throws your way or how long it takes you. And above all, the greatest thanks to God. I firmly believe that through him ALL things are possible. I also would like to thank God for bringing Travis, Stormi and Shade into my life at the beginning of this journey which was the stimulus for me becoming interested in the topic of work-family balance in higher education. Co-worker Satisfaction .

Related papers

Work Satisfaction among Junior College Faculty Members
Arthur Cohen

1973

Research conducted to determine whether two-year college faculty members are satisfied with their jobs is discussed. Following a review of studies made by other researchers, data collected in three different locations in the summer of 1973 are presented and discussed. The study population was comprised of 57 instructors from a small college in southern California, 19 instructors from nine colleges in an eastern state, and 146 instructors from a larger college in northern California. The three groups of instrpetors were asked to respond to questions on ,

View PDFchevron_right
Added benefits: How supporting women faculty in STEM improves everyone’s job satisfaction
Ian Handley

Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2018

Can gender-based diversity programs benefit everyone? We tested whether and how a broadening participation program intended to benefit women working within maledominated academic fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, may relate to job satisfaction for all who feel involved. Informed by self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 2012), we designed and tested a gender-diversity program that supported women faculty's psychological need for autonomy, relatedness, and competence through their involvement in five activities embedded in three "ADVANCE Project TRACS" (Transformation through Relatedness Autonomy and Competence Support) initiatives. Longitudinal repeated measures collected over 3 years from men and women tenure track faculty across disciplines show that for everyone, involvement with the program predicted a significant positive change in psychological need satisfaction. This change was associated with positive changes in job satisfaction over time. Results demonstrate the success of this particular program, and suggest that diversity programs that target one group can have widespread positive impacts on all who feel involved.

View PDFchevron_right
Satisfaction of Female Faculty at Two-Year Schools
Valerie Martin Conley

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings

Public two-year colleges contribute to the nation's STEM capacity by providing a foundation for baccalaureate degree attainment, educating a skilled math and science workforce and supporting local economic development. Their female faculty represent a vital national resource, particularly in STEM fields, where they often serve as role models and mentors for female students. Yet this population continues to be understudied. This paper examines the paths that women take toward employment in STEM at community colleges as well as factors that facilitate and hinder the advancement of women in STEM at community colleges. Data were collected by face-to-face interviews with 29 women faculty at nine community colleges in Ohio. Preliminarily results indicate considerable career satisfaction among many female faculty members, but contradict a popular stereotype that "community colleges make life easier for women with families.".

View PDFchevron_right
Job Satisfaction among University Faculty: Individual, Work, and Institutional Determinants
Monica Gaughan

The Journal of Higher Education, 2011

University professors differ in so many ways from other workers, including other highly educated professional workers, but do they differ in the factors determining their job satisfaction? A valid answer to this question is of more than passing interest. Armed with knowledge of the determinants of university professors' job satisfaction, university administrators can devise more effective strategies for recruitment and retention (

View PDFchevron_right
Disciplinary Differences in Faculty Career Satisfaction. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper
Ronald Opp

1992

A study examined the influence of behavioral activities such as teaching, research, and service on faculty career satisfaction using Astin's theory of involvement. The research tested Astin's theory in predicting variations in career satisfaction by disciplinary category, and the contention that disciplinary differences are critical for understanding faculty culture. The study utilized data obtained from a survey of 35,478 full-time undergraduate faculty, 13,810 of which were in the arts and sciences, designed to gather information on teaching and research activities, interactions with students and colleagues, and job satisfaction. Also used was the input-environment-output approach designed for measuring college impact and evaluating educational programs. Evaluation of the research showed that salary and interest in research are significant predictors of career satisfaction for all arts and science faculty. Only when separate analyses are run by broad disciplinary groups, however, does one find that the influence of these predictors varies considerably between groups. Overall, the research indicated that Clark appears correct in contending that the members of the American professorate are relatively satisfied with their careers; the study also supports Clark's contention that disciplinary differences are crucial in understanding faculty culture. (Contains 15 references.) (GLR)

View PDFchevron_right
Effects of Faculty-Student Interactions on Faculty Career Satisfaction
Natalie Batmanian

Women in Engineering ProActive Network, 2010

At the undergraduate, graduate and faculty levels, women represent 18%, 20% and 11% of the population, respectively (Science & Engineering Indicators, 2008). The number of women who to participate in engineering continues to remain low, particularly in academe. While a large body of research has shown that outreach and student development programming have positive impacts on the recruitment and retention of all make and female students (e.g.

View PDFchevron_right
Conceptualizing Faculty Job Satisfaction: Components, Theories, and Outcomes
Linda Serra Hagedorn

New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000

This introductory chapter both reviews the faculty satisfaction literature and tests a general model using a national database.

View PDFchevron_right
Factors influencing the retention of women faculty in STEM disciplines
Carrie Christensen

Low numbers of women faculty in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) disciplines continues to be a concern in higher education. Even though completion of STEM degrees by women has increased in many disciplines, increases in the number of women faculty have not been seen. Additionally, women continue to leave faculty positions at twice the rate of men. In order to remain globally competitive, the US needs to retain a diverse STEM professoriate. This dissertation examined the factors influencing the retention of women faculty in STEM disciplines and their overrepresentation in non-research intensive institutions. The analysis was broken into two parts. Using the 2013 HERI Faculty Survey, the constructs faculty stress, job satisfaction, and intent to leave were first examined for faculty group differences based upon gender, discipline, and institution type using EFA and MIMIC analyses. In the second part, I examined the structural relationship between these three constructs using SEM techniques. Women faculty were found to be more stressed, less satisfied, and had greater intent to leave. Faculty stress had both direct and indirect effects on intent to leave with greater indirect effects occurring due to the mediation of job satisfaction. Ultimately, women faculty in STEM were more likely to vi have intent to leave due to high levels of stress reducing their job satisfaction. In order to retain women faculty in STEM disciplines, institutions will need to examine their practices and policies to ensure women faculty are not being disadvantaged or discriminated based on their biology. By enabling women faculty to achieve a better work-life balance will not only increase their retention but will strengthen the entire professoriate. vii

View PDFchevron_right
Faculty Job Satisfaction and Morale in Biomedical Research
Nellian Hutton-Rose

High faculty morale and job satisfaction are vital for optimum performance and important to the quality and vitality of the academic enterprise. However, research on faculty morale and job satisfaction has historically been limited to faculty at traditional comprehensive institutions and specific professional programs. Faculty who conduct biomedical research at academic health centers experience substantial differences in employment expectations and how they are funded than other faculty. The purpose of this study was to explore how personal and professional factors contribute toward positive morale and job satisfaction for faculty in biomedical research programs at one academic health center. This qualitative study used individual semi-structured interviews to explore work-life aspects associated with self-reported levels of morale and job satisfaction. Results from this study indicated that biomedical research faculty enjoy their work and highly value collaborating with their colleagues. The persistent need to fund at least half of their salaries through soft money, the loss of valued colleagues due to turnover, and a lack of identity with their institution decreases job satisfaction. It was also found that job satisfaction is expressed differently by gender and length of employment at one's current institution. Female faculty expressed feelings of limited support for those raising families while faculty employed longer expressed lower satisfaction than those recently hired. Better understanding of what influences job satisfaction and morale for this population will help academic health centers further support their research faculty as well as increase positive faculty identification with the institution.

View PDFchevron_right
University of Wisconsin, Stout Campus Climate: University Staff Job Satisfaction
M Justin Miller, Phillip Stoeklen

A mixed-methodology research approach was taken to understand what job aspects impact university staff job satisfaction at the University of Wisconsin, Stout (UW-Stout). First, thematic analysis of a small number of qualitative interviews produced five themes that impacted university staff job satisfaction: (1) collaboration, (2) job variability, (3) supervision, (4) compensation, and (5) daily tasks. Researchers constructed a survey to measure implicit and explicit job satisfaction of university staff based on the themes generated by the interviews. For the purpose of this study, implicit job satisfaction is the combination of factors that affect job satisfaction, such as workload, supervision quality, communication, compensation, and benefits. A job satisfaction survey was administered to measure implicit job satisfaction in this study. Explicit job satisfaction is the staff members' direct perception of their job satisfaction. A single item on the survey asked participants directly about their level of job satisfaction to measure explicit job satisfaction. A measure based on three of the five themes was also administered to examine the predictor variables for job satisfaction. This aforementioned survey was sent to all the university staff at the UW-Stout. Statistical analysis revealed a positive correlation between implicit and explicit job satisfaction of university staff. Regression models found that collaboration, supervision, and compensation predicted implicit job satisfaction, whereas supervision and compensation predicted explicit job satisfaction of university staff.

View PDFchevron_right

References (212)

  1. Adkins, C. L., Werbel, J. D., & Fahr, J. L. (2001). A field study of job insecurity during a financial crisis. Group & Organization Management, 26(4), 463-483.
  2. Aisenberg, N., & Harrington, M. (1988). Women of academe: Outsiders in the sacred grove. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  3. Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278-308.
  4. Armenti, C. (2004). May babies and post tenure babies: Maternal decisions of women professors. Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 211-231.
  5. American Association of University Professors (AAUP) (2001). Statement of principles on family responsibilities and academic work. Retrieved at http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/CMS_Templates/GeneralArticle.aspx?NRMODE=Published &NRNODEGUID=%7b307D2225-CDBA-4560-863E- F0F4845599C1%7d&NRORIGINALURL=%2fAAUP%2fpubsres%2fpolicydocs%2fcon tents%2fworkfam-stmt%2ehtm&NRCACHEHINT=NoModifyGuest#5
  6. American Association of University Professors (AAUP). (2006). Annual report on the economic status of the profession. Academe, 92(2). Retrieved at http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2006/MA/sal/z06.htm Association of American University Professors (AAUP)(2006). Research director on gender gap. Academe, 90(3), 26-27.
  7. Association of American University Professors (AAUP) (2011). It"s not over yet: The annual report on the economic status of the profession. Retrieved at http://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/17BABE36-BA30-467D-BE2F- 34C37325549A/0/zreport.pdf
  8. American Association of University Women (AAUW) (2010). Why so few? Women in science, engineering, technology, and mathematics. Retrieved at http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/upload/whysofew.pdf
  9. August, L., & Waltman, J. (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 177-192.
  10. Austin, A. E., & Rice, R. E., (1998). Making tenure viable: Listening to early career faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(5), 736-754.
  11. Barinaga, E. (2007). Cultural diversity at work: National culture as a discourse organizing an international project group. Human Relations. New York, 60 (2), 315-340.
  12. Bedeian, A.G., Burke, B. G., & Moffett, R.G. (1988). Outcomes of work-family conflict among married male and female professionals. Journal of Management, 14(3), 475-491.
  13. Bedeian, A. G., Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Age, tenure, and job satisfaction: A tale of two perspectives. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 33-48.
  14. Bellas, M. L. 1993. Faculty salaries: Still a cost of being female? Social Science Quarterly, 74(1), 62-75.
  15. Bellas, M. L. (1994). Comparable worth in academia: The effects on faculty salaries of the sex composition and labor-market conditions of academic disciplines. American Sociological Review, 59(6), 807-821.
  16. Bender, K. A., & Heywood, J. S. (2006). Job satisfaction of the highly educated: The role of gender, academic tenure, and earnings. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53(2), 253-279.
  17. Bersoff, D., & Crosby, F. (1984). Job satisfaction and family status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(1), 78-84.
  18. Bertz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44(1), 32-54.
  19. Boles, J. S., Howard, W. G., & Donofrio, H. H. (2001). An investigation into the inter- relationships of work-family conflict, family-work conflict and work satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(3), 376-390.
  20. Bowen, B. E. (1980). Job satisfaction of teacher educators in agriculture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio.
  21. Bowen, B. E., & Radhakrisha, R. B. (1991, January). Herberg's motivator-hygiene theory and the job satisfaction of agricultural education faculty. Paper presented at the National Agricultural Education Research Meeting, Cincinnati, OH.
  22. Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). Job satisfaction among university faculty: Individual, work, and institutional determinants. Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154-186.
  23. Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2006). SPSS for psychologists (3 rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.
  24. Brayfield, A.H. & Crockett, W.H. (1955). Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 396-424.
  25. Brayfield, A. H. & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311.
  26. Brief, A. P. (1998). Attitudes in and around organizations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
  27. Brown, A. K. & Mitchell, T. (1993). Organizational obstacles: Links with financial performance, customer satisfaction, and job satisfaction in a service environment. Human Relations, 3(4), 345- 360.
  28. Bruck, C. S., Allen, T. D., & Spector, P. E. (2002). The relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction: A finer-grained analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(3), 336-353.
  29. Bryson, R., Bryson, J. B., & Johnson, M. F. (1978). Family size, satisfaction, and productivity in dual- career couples. In J. B. Bryson & R. Bryson (Eds.) Dual-career couples (pp. 67-77). New York: Human Sciences Press.
  30. Callister, R. R. (2006). The impact of gender and department climate on job satisfaction and intentions to quit for faculty in sciences and engineering fields. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(3), 367-375.
  31. Calvo-Salguero, A., Carrasco-Gonzalez, A. M., Salinas-Martinez de Lecea, J. M. (2010). Relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction: The moderating effect of gender and the salience of family and work roles. African American Journal of Business Management, 4(7), 1247-1259.
  32. Campbell, A., Converse, P., & Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  33. Cano, J. & Miller, G. (1992). An analysis of job satisfaction and job satisfier factors among six taxonomies of agricultural teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 33(4), 9-16.
  34. Caplan, P. (1994). Lifting a ton of feathers: A woman's guide for surviving in the academic world. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
  35. Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 249-276.
  36. Casper, W. J., Martin, J. A., Buffardi, L. C., & Erdwins, C. J. (2002). Work-family conflict, perceived organizational support, and organizational commitment among employed mothers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(2), 99-108.
  37. Castillo, J. X., & Cano, J. (2004). Factors explaining job satisfaction among faculty. Journal of Agricultural Education, 45(3), 65-74.
  38. Castillo, J. X., Conklin, E. A., & Cano, J. (1998). Job satisfaction of Ohio agricultural education teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 40(2), 19-27.
  39. Cetin, O. (2006). The relationship between job satisfaction, occupation and organization commitment. Academy of Business Journal, 8(1), 78-90.
  40. Christman, D. E. (2003, Fall). Women faculty in higher education: Impeded by academe. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 14.
  41. Clark, A. E. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender. Why are women so happy at work? Labor Economics, 4, 341-372.
  42. The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Edcuation (2010). The experience of tenure- track faculty at research universities: Analysis of COACHE survey results by academic area and gender. Retrieved at http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic436591.files/COACHE_AnalysisByAcademicAr eaAndGender_2010.pdf
  43. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3 rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  44. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
  45. Cohen, P. (2008). The 60s begin to fade as liberal professors retire. The New York Times, July 3.
  46. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1987). Marriage, motherhood and research performance in science. Scientific American, 256(2), 119-125.
  47. Collins, L. H., Chrisler, J. C., & Quina, K. (Eds.) (1998). Career strategies for women in academe: Arming Athena. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  48. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP). (2007). Beyond biases: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. The National Academies of Press, Washington, DC.
  49. Corley, E., & Sabharwal, M. (2007). Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: Producing more and getting less than their U. S.-born peers? Research in Education, 48(8), 909-940.
  50. Cranny, C., Smith, P., & Stone, E. (1992). Job satisfaction: How people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance. Lexington Books, New York: NY.
  51. Crittenden, A. (2001). The price of motherhood: Why the most important job in the world is still the least valued. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
  52. Crosby, F. (1983). Work satisfaction and domestic life. In M. D. Lee & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Managing work and home life (pp. 41-60) New York: Praeger
  53. Davis, J. A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 49.
  54. Davis, R. H. (2001). Faculty recruitment and retention task force report. Boulder: University of Colorado.
  55. Davis, K., & Newstrom, J. W. (1989). Human behavior at work: Organizational behavior. (8 th ed.) McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York: NY.
  56. de Janasz, S. C., & Behson, S. J. (2007). Cognitive capacity for processing work-family conflict: an initial examination. Career Development International, 12(4), 397-411.
  57. Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. (1994). Interference between work and family: A status report on dual-career and dual-earner mothers and fathers. Employee Assistance Quarterly, 9(3/4), 55-80.
  58. Ehrenberg, R. G., Kasper, H., & Rees, D. I. (1991). Faculty turnover in American colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 10(2), 99-110.
  59. Eyupoglu, S. Z., & Saner, T. (2009). Job satisfaction: Does rank make a difference? African Journal of Business Management, 3(10), 609-615.
  60. Finkel, S. K., & Olswang, S. G. (1996). Child rearing as a career impediment to women assistant professors. Review of Higher Education, 19(2), 123-139.
  61. Finkel, S. K., Olswang, S. G., & She, N. (1994). Childbirth, tenure, and promotion for women faculty. Review of Higher Education, 17(3), 259-270.
  62. Finkelstein, M. J., & Schuster, J. H. (2001). Assessing the silent revolution: How changing demographics are reshaping the academic profession. AAHE Bulletin,54(2), 3-7.
  63. Fogg, P. (2005, January 28). Harvard's president wonders aloud about women in science and math. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(21), A12.
  64. Fox, M. F. (1991). Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, & J. T. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp. 188-204). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  65. Frone, M. R. (2003). Work-family balance. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.). Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  66. Gappa, J. M., & Austin, A. E. (2010). Rethinking academic traditions for twenty-first century faculty. AAUP Journal of Academic Freedom,1.
  67. Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483-496.
  68. Gordon, J. R., Whelan-Berry, K. S., & Hamilton, E. A. (2007). The relationship among work- family conflict and enhancement, organizational work-family culture, and work outcomes for older working women. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(4): 350-364.
  69. Grandey, A., Cordeiro, B. L., & Crouter, A. C. (2005). A longitudinal and multisource test of the work-family conflict and job satisfaction relationship. The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 1-20.
  70. Grant, L., Kennelly, I., & Ward, K. B. (2000). Revisiting the gender, marriage, and parenthood puzzle in scientific careers. Women's Studies Quarterly, 1-2, 62-85.
  71. Grace, D. H., & Khalsa, S. A. (2003). Re-recruiting faculty and staff: The antidote to today"s high attrition. Independent School, 62(3), 20-27.
  72. Greenglass, E. R., Pantony, K. L., & Burke, R. J. (1989). A gender-role perspective on role conflict, work stress, and social support. In E. B. Goldsmith (Ed.), Work and family: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 317-328). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  73. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.
  74. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. S., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26(3), 463-488.
  75. Gruenberg, B. (1980). The happy worker: an analysis of educational occupational differences in determinants of job satisfaction. The American Journal of Sociology, 86(2), 247-271.
  76. Grunwald, H., & Peterson, M. W. (2003). Factors that promote faculty involvement in and satisfaction with institutional and classroom student assessment. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 173-204.
  77. Hagedorn, L.(1996). Wage equity and female faulty job-satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction casual model. Research in Higher Education, 37(5), 569-598.
  78. Hagedorn, L. (2000). What contributes to job satisfaction among faculty and staff. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 105. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  79. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6 th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.
  80. Halpern, D., Wai, J., & Saw, A. (2005). A psychobiosocial model: Why females are sometimes greater than and sometimes less than males in math achievement. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics (pp. 48-72). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  81. Hensel, N. (1991). Realizing gender equality in higher education: The need to integrate family/work issues. (1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 2). Washington DC: George Washington School of Education and Human Development.
  82. Herzberg, F., Maunser, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York, NY, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  83. Hill, E. J., Yang, C. M., Hawkins, A. J., & Ferris, M. (2004). A cross-cultural test of the work- family interface in 48 countries. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66(5), 1300-1316.
  84. Hochschild, A. (1975). Inside the clockwork of male and female careers. In Howe, F. (Ed.), Women and the power to change (pp. 47-80). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  85. Hochschild, A. R. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
  86. Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift. New York, NY: Avon Books.
  87. Holden, E.W., & Black, M.M. (1996). Psychologists in medical school professional issues for the future: how are rank and tenured associated with productivity and satisfaction. Professional Psychology, Research, and Practice, 27(4), 4
  88. Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction. New York: NY, Harper and Row.
  89. Howard, W. G. D'Onofrio, H. H. & Boles, J. S. (2004). Inter-domain work-family conflict and police work satisfaction. Policing, 27(3): 380-395
  90. Johnsrud, L. K., & Atwater, C. D. (1993). Scaffolding the ivory tower: Building supports for new faculty to the academy. CUPA Journal, 44(1), 1-14.
  91. Judge, T. A., & Watanabe, S. (1993). Another look at the job satisfaction-life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 939-948.
  92. Kalleberg, A.L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42(1), 124-43.
  93. Kelly, J. D. (1989). Gender, pay, and job satisfaction of faculty in journalism. Journalism Quarterly, 66(22), 446-452.
  94. Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  95. Kopelman, R.E., Greenhaus, J.H., and Connolly, T.F. (1983). A model of work, family, and interrole conflict: A construct validation study. Organizational behavior and human performance, 32(4), 198-215.
  96. Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1992). Marriage, motherhood, and wages. Journal of Human Resources, 27(2), 233-255.
  97. Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work-family conflict, policies, and the job-life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior -human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 139-149.
  98. Kotrlik, J. W., Williams, H. A., & Jabor, M. (2010). Reporting and interpreting effect size in quantitative research in agricultural education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 132-142, doi: 10.5032/jae.2011.01132
  99. LaPierre, L. M., Spector, P. M., Allen, T. A., Poelmans, S., Cooper, C. L., O"Driscoll, M. P., Sanchez, J., Brough, P., & Kinnunen, U. (2008). Family-supportive organization perceptions, multiple dimensions of work-family conflict and employee satisfaction: A test of model across five samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 92-106.
  100. Lease, S. H. (1999). Occupational role stressors, coping, support and hardiness as predictors on strain in academic faculty: An emphasis on new and female faculty. Research in Higher Education, 40(3): 285-307.
  101. Leung, T. W., Siu, O. L, & Spector, P. E. (2000). Faculty stressors, job satisfaction, and psychological distress among university teachers in Hong Kong: The role of locus of control. International Journal of Stress Management, 7(2), 121-138.
  102. Lockwood, N. R. (2003). The aging workforce: The reality of the impact of older workers and eldercare in the workplace. HR Magazine, 48(12). Retrieved March, 20, 2011 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3495/is_12_48/ai_n5989579/
  103. Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  104. Loh, E. (1996). Productivity differences and the marriage wage premium for white males. Journal of Human Resources, 31(3), 566-589.
  105. Long, J. S. (2001). From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  106. Malik, N. (2011). A study on job satisfaction factors of faculty members at the University of Balochistan. Journal of Research in Education, 21(2), 49-57.
  107. Manchester, A. (2008). Workplace diversity is "work in progress". Retrieved August 23, 2009 from the site www.internalcommshub.com
  108. Martin, J. K., & Hanson, S. L. (1985) Sex, family wage earning status and satisfaction with work. Work and Occupations 16(12), 91-109. doi: 10.1177/0730888489016002005
  109. Mason, M. A., & Ekman, E. M. (2007). Mothers on the Fast track: How a New Generation Can Balance Family Careers. New York: Oxford University Press.
  110. Mason, M.A., & Goulden, M.. 2002. Do babies matter? The effect of family formation on the lifelong careers of academic men and women. Academe, 88(6), 21-27
  111. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). (1999). A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  112. McKee, J. G. (1991). Leadership styles of community college presidents and faculty job satisfaction. Community/Junior College Quarterly, 15(1), 33-46.
  113. Menges,.
  114. R. J., & Exum, W. H. (1983). Barriers to the progress of women and minority faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 54(2), 123-144.
  115. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 59-63.
  116. Mooney, L. A., Knox, D., & Schacht, C. (2010). Understanding social problems. Thompson/Wadworth; CA.
  117. Monroe, K., Ozyurt, S., Wrigley, T., & Alexander, A. (2008). Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 215- 233.
  118. Moxley, L. S. (1977). Job satisfaction of faculty teacher higher education: An examination of Herzberg's dual factor theory and Porter's need satisfaction. (ERIC Document Service No. ED 139 349).
  119. Nadeem, M. S., & Abbas, Q. (2009). The impact of work life conflict on job satisfactions of employees in Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management, 4 (5), 63-83.
  120. National Science Foundation. (2005). Survey of doctorate recipients characteristics of doctoral scientists and engineers in the United States. Arlington, VA: Division of Science Resources Studies.
  121. National Science Foundation. (2007). Division of Science Resources Studies. Five myths about girls and science. Arlington, VA: NSF National Science Foundation. (2011). ADVANCE at a glance retrieved at http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/advance/index.jsp
  122. Near, J. P., Rice, R. W., & Hunt, R. G. (1978). Work and extra work correlates of life and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 95-114.
  123. Nestor, P. I., & Leary, P. (2000). The relationship between tenure and non-tenure track status of extension faculty and job satisfaction. Journal of Extension, 38(4). Available from http://www.joe.org/joe/2000august/rb1.php
  124. Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work- family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400-410.
  125. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2 nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  126. O"Driscoll, M., Brough, P., & Kalliath, T. (2004). Work-family conflict, psychological well- being, satisfaction and social support: A longitudinal study in New Zealand. Equal Opportunities International, 23(1/2), 36-56.
  127. O"Driscoll, M. P., Ilgen, D. R., & Hildreth, K. (1992). Time devoted to job and off-job activities: Interrole conflict, and affective experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 272- 279.
  128. O"Laughlin, E., & Bischoff, L. (2005) Balancing parenthood and academia. Journal of Family Issues, 26(1), 79-106.
  129. Olsen, D., Maple, S., & Stage, F. (1995). Women and minority job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. Journal of Higher Education, 66(3), 267-293.
  130. Okpara, J. O., Squillace, M., & Erondu, E. A. (2005). Gender differences and job satisfaction: A study of university teachers in the United States. Women in Management Review. 20(3), 177-190.
  131. Oshagbemi, T. (1997). The influence of rank on the job satisfaction of organizational members. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12(8): 511-519.
  132. Oshagbemi, T. (2000). Gender differences in job satisfaction of university teachers. Women in Management Review 15(7), 511-519.
  133. Oshagbemi, T. (2003). Personal correlates of job satisfaction: Empirical evidence from UK universities. International Journal of Social Economics, 30(12), 1210-1231.
  134. Padilla-Velez, D. (1993). Job satisfaction of vocational teachers in Puerto Rico. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University. Columbus, Ohio.
  135. Pearson, D. A., & Seiler, R. E. (1983). Environmental satisfiers in academe. Higher Education, 12(1), 35-47.
  136. Perna, L. (2001). Sex differences in faculty salaries: A cohort analysis. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 283-307.
  137. Perrone, K. M., Wright, S. L., & Jackson, Z. V. (2009). Traditional and nontraditional gender roles and work-family interface for men and women. Journal of Career Development, 36(1), 8-24.
  138. Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York, NY: Viking.
  139. Pond, S. B., & Geyer, P. D. (1991). Differences in the relation between job satisfaction and perceived work alternatives among older and younger blue-collar workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 39(2), 251-262.
  140. Preston, A. (1994). Where have all the women gone? A study of exit of women from the science and engineering professions. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1446-1462.
  141. Press, J. E., & Townsley, E. (1998). Wives" and husbands" housework reporting: Gender, class, and social desirability. Gender and Society, 12(2), 188-218.
  142. Quinn, R. P., & Shepard, L. J. (1974). The 1972-1973 Quality of employment survey: Descriptive statistics with comparison data front the 1969-1970 survey of working conditions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Survey Research Center.
  143. Rausch, D. K., Ortiz, B. P., Douthitt, R. A., & Reed, L. L. (1989). The academic revolving door: Why do women get caught? CUPA Journal, 40(1), 1-16.
  144. Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational behavior concepts, controversies, and applications. Prentice Hall: London.
  145. Robinson, J. P. (1988). Who's doing the housework? American Demographics, 10, 24 -63.
  146. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.) Meaures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 1-16). New York: Academic Press.
  147. Rothblum, E. D. (1988). Leaving the ivory towers: Factors contributing to women"s voluntary resignation from academia. Frontiers, 10(2), 14-17.
  148. Ropers-Huilman, B. (2000). Aren"t you satisfied yet? Women faculty members" interpretations of their academic work. New Directions for Institutional Research, 27(1), 21-32.
  149. Rosser, S. V. (2004a). Using POWRE to ADVANCE: Institutional barriers identified by women scientists and engineers. NWSA Journal, 16(1): 50-78.
  150. Rosser, S. V. (2004b). Faculty members" intention to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 45(3), 223-234.
  151. Rosser, S. V. (2005). Measuring the change in faculty perceptions over time: An examination of their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 81-107.
  152. Rosser, S. V., & Daniels, J. Z. (2004). Widening paths to success, improving the environment, and moving toward lessons learned from the experiences of POWRE and CBL awardees. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(2), 131-148. doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v10.i2.20
  153. Roxburgh, S. (1999). Exploring the work and family relationship: Gender differences in the influence of parenthood and social support on job satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 20(6), 771-788. doi: 10.1177/0192513990200060003
  154. Sabharwal, M., & Corley, E. (2009). Faculty job satisfation across gender and discipline. The Social Science Journal, 46(3), 539-556.
  155. Sax, L. J., Hagedorn, L. S., Arredondo, M., & DiCrisi III, F. (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 423-446.
  156. Schuster, M. J. & Finkelstein, M. (2006). The Restructuring of Academic Work and Careers: The American faculty. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  157. Seifert, T. A. & Umbach, P. D. (2008). The effects of faculty demographic characteristics and disciplinary context on dimensions of job satisfaction. Research in Higher Education, 49(4), 357-381.
  158. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322.
  159. Simeone, A. (1987). Academic Women: Working Towards Equality. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers, Inc.
  160. Sloane, P., & Ward, M. (2001). Cohort effects and job satisfaction of academics. Applied Economic Letters, 8(12), 787-791.
  161. Sloane, P., & Williams, H. (2000). Job satisfaction, comparison earnings, and gender. Labour, 14(3), 473-501.
  162. Smart, J. (1990). A casual model of faculty turnover intentions. Review of Higher Education, 31(5), 405-424.
  163. Smith, P., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. (1969). Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Chicago: IL. Rand McNally.
  164. Smith, D.B. & Plant, W. T. (1982). Sex differences in the job: Satisfaction of university professors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 249-51
  165. Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1995). Gender differences in science careers: The project access study. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  166. Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1996). Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientist, 84(1), 63-71.
  167. Sorcinelli, M. D., & Near.J.P. (1989). Relations between work and life away from work among university faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 60(1), 59-82.
  168. Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 693-713.
  169. Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Sage Publishers. Thousand Oaks: CA.
  170. Spelke, E. (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? American Psychologist, 60 (9), 950-958.
  171. Springfield-Scott, M. (2000, May). Faculty job satisfaction in a university work environment. Thresholds in Education, 25-32.
  172. Sseganga, K., & Garrett, R. M. (2005). Job satisfaction of university academics: Perspectives from Uganda. Higher Education, 50(1), 33-56.
  173. Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge Academic.
  174. Tack, M.W., & Patitu, C.L. (1992). Faculty job satisfaction: Women and minorities in peril. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4. Washington DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
  175. Tang, T. L., & Talpade, M. (1999). Sex differences in satisfaction with pay and coworkers: Faculty and staff at a public institution of higher education. Public Personnel Management, 28(3), 345-349.
  176. Tang, C., & Wadsworth, S. M. (2008). 2008 National study on the changing workplace: Time and workplace flexibility. Families and Work Institute, www.familiesandwork.org The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) (2010). The experience of tenure-track faculty at research universities: Analysis of COACHE survey results by academic area and gender. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic436591.files/COACHE_AnalysisByAcademicAr eaAndGender_2010.pdf
  177. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51(4), 845-871.
  178. Toutkoushian, R. K. (1998). Racial and relationship status differences in faculty pay. Journal of Higher Education, 69(5), 513-541.
  179. Toutkoushian, R., Bellas, M., & Moore, J. (2007). The interaction of gender, race, and relationship status on faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 572-601.
  180. Toutkoushian, R., & Conley, V. (2005). Progress for women in academe, yet inequities persist. Evidence from NSOPF:99. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 1-28.
  181. Tuckman, H. P. (1979). The academic reward structure in American higher education. In Academic rewards in higher education (pp. 165-190). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.
  182. Urbaniak, G. C., & Plous, S. (1998). Research Randomizer 1.5 [Web-based interactive program]. Available: http://www.randomizer.org/
  183. Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  184. Valian, V. (2005). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia, 20(3), 198-213.
  185. Ward, M. E., & Sloane, P. J. (2000). Non-pecuniary advantages versus pecuniary disadvantages: Job satisfaction among male and female academics in Scottish universities. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47(3), 273-303.
  186. Warren, J. A., & Johnson, P. J. (1995). The impact of workplace support on work-family role strain. Family Relations, 7, 163-169.
  187. Weiss, D., Dawis, R.,. Lofquist, L., & England, G. (1966). Instrumentation for the theory of work adjustment. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
  188. Williams, J. (2000). Unbending Gender: Why Work and Family Conflict and What to do About it. Oxford:UK. Oxford University Press.
  189. Winslow, S. (2005). Work-family conflict, gender, and parenthood, 1977-1997. Journal of Family Issues, 26(6), 727-755.
  190. Wolfinger, N. H., Mason, M. A., & Goulden, M. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Gender, marriage, and fertility in the ivory tower. Journal of Higher Education, 79(4), 388-405.
  191. Wood, O. R. (1973). An analysis of faculty motivation to work in the North Carolina community college system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University. Raleigh, NC.
  192. Wood, O. R. (1976) A research project: Measuring job satisfaction of the community college staff. Community College Review, 3(3), 56-64.
  193. Yildirim, D., & Aycan, Z. (2008). Nurses" work demands and work-family conflict: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(9), 1366-1378.
  194. Zhou, Y., & Volkwein, J. F. (2003). The influences on faculty departure in two-year colleges: A national study using NSOPF-99. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE) Conference, Portland, OR.
  195. Zuckerman, H. (1991). The careers of men and women scientists: A review of current research. In H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, & J. T. Bruer, Eds, The Outer Circle (pp. 27-56). New York: W. W. Norton & Co. Reward Satisfaction Items The next 4 questions relate the reward satisfaction at your current position.
  196. When I do a good job, I receive the recognition for it that I should receive.
  197. I do not feel that the work I do is appreciated.
  198. There are few rewards for those who work here.
  199. Many of our rules and procedures make doing a good job difficult.
  200. I have too much to do at work.
  201. I like the people I work with.
  202. I find I have to work harder at my job than I should because of the incompetence of other people.
  203. I enjoy my co-workers.
  204. There is too much bickering and fighting at work. Work Itself Items The next 4 questions relate to the work that you do in your current position.
  205. I sometimes feel my job is meaningless.
  206. I feel a sense of pride in doing my job.
  207. Communications seem good within this organization.
  208. The goals of this organization are not clear to me.
  209. I often feel that I do not know what is going on with the organization.
  210. Work assignments are often not fully explained.
  211. What is your rank? Professor Associate Professor Assistant Professor
  212. Please enter your email here if you would like to receive a copy of the final report.

Related papers

Factors affecting university Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathemathics (STEM) faculty job satisfaction.
Lisa Babin Verret

Many job satisfaction studies have been done on faculty in higher education, but very little research has focused on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) faculty. Through these studies, very little consensus has been reached on the satisfaction levels of male and female faculty. The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine the job satisfaction of tenured and tenure-track male and female STEM faculty at research institutions in six states. Moreover, the study sought to examine the relationship between STEM faculty job satisfaction and potential explanatory factors: gender, rank, tenure, salary, family status, whether or not there are children living in the home, number of children living in the home, and work-family conflict. The instruments used in the study were the Job Satisfaction Survey and the Work-family Conflict Scale, both of which are six item likert-type scales. A negative statistically significant relationship existed between work-family conflict and job satisfaction. Faculty who reported lower work-family conflict reported significantly higher job satisfaction than faculty with high work-family conflict. In addition, a negative statistically significant relationship existed between work interference with family (WIF) and job satisfaction. The correlation between WIF and job satisfaction shows that as work interference with family increases, job satisfaction decreases. Multiple regression analysis revealed that two factors, work interference with family and family status (married or not married), accounted for 13.6% of the variance, which indicates that there are many other factors that affect university STEM faculty job satisfaction than the ones that were identified in this study. The results of this study can be used by administrators to aid in making organizational decisions that may lead to increased STEM faculty job satisfaction. Some of these changes might include implementing family-friendly policies and programs to increase the supportiveness of the work-family culture.

View PDFchevron_right
Faculty job satisfaction across gender and discipline
Meghna Sabharwal

Social Science Journal, 2009

It is projected that by 2014 colleges, universities, and professional schools will witness an employment growth of 34.3% (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2005). Thus, issues of faculty satisfaction, retention, and persistence will become increasingly important for university administrators and education policy makers. The need to study faculty satisfaction at universities also stems from the fact that the intellectual and social structures of higher education are changing over time. Increasingly, women and minorities are more likely to occupy higher ranks of the professoriate. The purpose of this research is to explore and compare the job satisfaction rates of faculty members employed in research institutions with special attention paid to differences across gender and disciplines. The study employs data from the 2003 Survey of Doctorate Recipients, which is a biennially collected survey of doctoral awardees and is funded by the National Science Foundation.

View PDFchevron_right
Gender Differences in Pathways to Faculty Career Satisfaction
Robin Andreasen

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings

Women engineers are underrepresented in the U.S. workforce and at all levels in academiaundergraduate, graduate, postdoctoral, and all faculty ranks. One strategy for increasing the number of women engineering students and professionals is to increase the number of women faculty who teach, advise, and mentor students. For this reason, programs like NSF ADVANCE devote resources to improve institutional climate with the goal of recruiting, retaining, and advancing to leadership women STEM faculty. As part of an NSF ADVANCE grant (NSF HRD 1409472), the University of Delaware (UD) initiated a biannual faculty climate survey in the spring of 2014. Because faculty satisfaction has been linked to retention and advancement, one goal of this survey is to better understand the relative importance of different aspects of faculty work life on career satisfaction and potential gender differences therein. Based on earlier research 6 and on data from the UD faculty climate survey, we used path analysis to examine potential gender differences in pathways to career satisfaction. The variables that we explored were formal and informal mentoring, academic resources (e.g., lab space, research assistants), collegial support, effectiveness of the department chair, and transparency of policies and procedures (e.g., for promotion and tenure, family leave). factors in faculty career satisfaction 19,38. Several studies report gender disparities in lab/office space, teaching/service loads, and other types of research support 19,27. Internal relational support refers to collegial relationships among departmental colleagues of a type that make a faculty member feel valued, included, supported, and respected by her peers. Such supports are important to career satisfaction, in part, because they provide opportunities for collaboration, assistance, and information. Perhaps due to low representation, women faculty report feelings of isolation and, thus, may not receive the same internal relational supports as men 3,4,12,15,24,25,27,35,39. Yet, collegial exchange may be even more important for women than for men in finding job satisfaction 4,12. Faculty Career Satisfaction Model 1

View PDFchevron_right
Factors Explaining Job Satisfaction Among Faculty
Jamie Cano

Journal of Agricultural Education, 2004

The purpose of this descriptive-correlational study was to describe the amount of variance in faculty member's overall level of job satisfaction explained by job motivator and hygiene factors. Additionally, the study sought to investigate the suitability of a one-item versus a multi-item measure of overall job satisfaction. The faculty were generally satisfied with their jobs. However, female faculty members were less satisfied than male faculty members. The factor "work itself" was the most motivating aspect for faculty. The least motivating aspect was "working conditions." The demographic characteristics were negligibly related to overall job satisfaction. All of the job motivator and hygiene factors were moderately or substantially related to overall job satisfaction. The factors "recognition," "supervision," and "relationships" explained the variability among faculty members' overall level of job satisfaction. The one-item measure of overall job satisfaction was not different from a multi-item measure of overall job satisfaction.

View PDFchevron_right
Surveying the Campus Climate for Faculty: A Comparison of the Assessments of STEM and non-STEM faculty
Dana Britton

International Journal of Gender Science and Technology, 2012

A fundamental assumption of programs intended to increase the numbers of women faculty in science, engineering and math (STEM) has been that women in these disciplines experience a uniquely hostile climate. While this focus on STEM faculty is necessary and important, we argue that it may be too narrow. In this paper, we compare STEM to non-STEM faculty, drawing on a representative survey of university faculty in one institution (N=612) conducted in 2007. Our findings indicate that non-white men in the STEM disciplines are in fact significantly less satisfied than white men in these fields and less satisfied than their counterparts in non-STEM fields. Among white women, those in STEM fields are significantly less satisfied than those in non-STEM disciplines. These differences are largely mediated by perceptions of work and contextual factors, however. With a few exceptions, we find that the factors that predict satisfaction are the same across groups of faculty. This implies that efforts to improve university and departmental climates will benefit all faculty.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Psychology
  • Medicine
  • Work Family Conflict
  • Human Resources Management
  • Job Attitude
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved