Nina Held
580 California St., Suite 400
San Francisco, CA, 94104
Queer Migration and Asylum in Europe
2021
https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000243165visibility
…
description
279 pages
link
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Queering social research on Sexuality, Migration and Asylum through co-authoring with participants
This article draws on a dialogue between a social researcher and a research participant. The analysis unfolds through our sustained dialogue and the autoethnographic narratives we share. Co-authoring gave us both unexpected insights pertaining to experiences of researching and undergoing the asylum process from the viewpoint of the sexual minority subject. We wanted to do this by producing an autoethnographic account (Reed-Danahay 1997; Ellis 2009), important to 'revealing the interconnection of one's personal experiences and larger social structures' (Ruiz-Junco and Vidal-Ortiz 2011). In the writing of this article, one important consideration was to attend to the power relations that could shape our common undertaking. For this, we referred to the scholarly work of Richa Nagar whose thoughtful cross-border co-authoring practices reinforce the importance of critical self-reflexivity. In so doing we attempted to attentively contextualise the participatory methods we use as researchers of the social, and to take them out of the apolitical vacuum in which they may readily end up when they are co-opted by the managerial cultures of the neoliberal university.
Fleeing Homophobia: Asylum Claims Related to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Europe
2011
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
The Shaping of Queer Migration by Asylum Claim: the Case of Queer Asylum Seekers and Refugees in France
2018
Fleeing their homeland, some queer migrants find refuge in France, where they initiate an asylum procedure based on their sexuality. Studies of these increasing asylum claims have been especially focusing on issues of sexual identity. In a context of suspicion, asylum seekers have to prove their homosexuality or bisexuality, but their credibility is confronted with homonormative visions running among the administration members of the host country. Yet less has been done on the articulation of asylum and migration. Based on a participant observation within a Parisian association that supports queer asylum seekers and refugees, this intervention aims to understand the ways claim for asylum shapes sexual migration and its experience. First, we will consider how queer migrants come to apply (or not) for asylum on the grounds of their sexuality. By doing so it appears that the access to asylum claim itself may be problematic, but also that the increasing used in political rhetoric and practices distinction between « economic migrants » and « refugees » may not be relevant. Secondly, we will look at the ways this asylum claim shapes queer migrants' lives in France. As a procedure based on one's sexuality it may be difficult for some of them engaged in transnational heteronormative relationships to deal with. As a social practice for those supported by an association, it may reconfigure their life in France and their present and future experiences of migration.
Gender, sexuality, asylum and European human rights (to be published in Law & Critique)
Asylum law functions through a dichotomy between an idealized notion of Europe as a site characterized by human rights, and non-European countries as sites of oppression. In most social sciences and humanities literature, this dichotomy is seen as legitimizing European dominance and exclusion of non-Europeans. However, it is the same dichotomy which is used by asylum seekers to claim inclusion through the grant of asylum. Focusing on the inclusive potential of this exclusive dichotomy allows us to explore the ambiguities inherent in the dichotomy. In asylum claims based on persecution on account of gender and sexuality, it becomes evident that not all human rights are considered equally fundamental. In many cases, asylum seekers are required to renounce human rights in order to prevent persecution, for example by complying with patriarchal family norms. Even where this requirement is rejected, asylum law illustrates the ambiguous relation between Europe and human rights.
''We Do Not Matter'': Transgender Migrants/Refugees in the Dutch Asylum System
Although the Netherlands is renowned for its forerunner position in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, and intersex (LGBTI) rights, this study urges one to question whether it can still live up to that image. Reports, news items, and signals from non-governmental organizations, such as Transgender Network Netherlands in the field show that especially transgender migrants/refugees regularly face abuse and discrimination. Yet, academic research underlying such findings is scarce. Moreover, a highly gendered discourse on the current migration/refugee crisis makes transgender migrants/refugees even more invisible. This article presents an interpretive approach to the institutional and disciplinary realities they become part of. The approach comes from (1) a literature review, surveying both scholarly publications and other sources; (2) patchwork or instant ethnography, thickening the findings from the literature; (3) and foremostly a theoretical interpretation of the precarious situation in which many transgender migrants/refugees find themselves. We draw upon synthesizing concepts such as ''total institution'' (Goffman 1961; Henry 1963), ''human waste'' (Bauman 2004), and ''armed love'' (Ticktin 2011) to constitute our theoretical framework, through which we show that transgender migrants/refugees are met with compassion and pity, rather than equal rights and full citizenship. This bitter logic leads us to the conclusion that within the Dutch asylum system, transgender migrants/refugees are rendered politically irrelevant, which eventually reflects the main priority of the Dutch authorities (and society at large) to control the boundaries of the nation-state, rather than to address the needs and rights of those people who seek, on legitimate grounds, a passport to a better, that is, a full life.
Introduction: Queer Migration, Asylum, and Displacement
This special issue of Sexualities emerges in response to the growing visibility of LGBTQI immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers within global gay rights advocacy. Despite the increasing prominence of LGBTQI issues on the international human rights agenda, there has been relatively little discussion of the relationship between queer migration and LGBTQI human rights activism in the field of sexuality studies. This special issue seeks to bring queer migration and sexual citizenship studies into critical conversation with current literature in the area of gender, sexuality and human rights.
Affective Displacements: Understanding Emotions and Sexualities in Refugee Law
Validating asylum claims on the basis of a person’s sexual orientation relies on discerning what constitutes sexuality and a ‘well founded fear’ of persecution. This administrative process works by suturing narratives of ‘functioning’ sexuality to specific incidents of persecution. Emotion, desire and feeling are obscured in this ethnocentric method of verification. In attempting to dislodge how sexuality remains a fixed and universal identity in the law, this article traces how emotion can be considered in spatial and culturally specific terms, to represent how asylum seekers experience persecution in relation to their ‘queerness’.
The reform of the Common European Asylum System: Fifteen recommendations from a Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Perspective
Since the 1990s, the European Union (EU) has slowly developed an increasingly sophisticated body of asylum law and policy, known as the Common European Asylum System (CEAS). This framework – both in the shape of legislative instruments and case law – has inevitably also affected those asylum seekers who claim asylum on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity (SOGI). This has been vividly demonstrated by particular norms in EU asylum instruments and judgments of the Court of Justice of EU (CJEU). The current CEAS can be said to have several shortcomings in relation to SOGI claims, including in relation to: country of origin information; the notion of ‘safe country of origin’; the burden of proof and the principle of benefit of the doubt; the concept of a ‘particular social group’; and the definition of persecution. A new set of proposals for reform of the CEAS was put forward in 2016 by the European Commission, and these also affect SOGI asylum claims in precise and acute ways. This policy brief scrutinises these proposals of reform, and assesses the extent to which these proposals and different institutional positions address, ignore or aggravate the issues that currently affect asylum seekers who identify as LGBTI (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex). The policy brief makes fifteen recommendations for European policymakers in regards to the reform of the CEAS, in order to ensure that the needs of LGBTI asylum seekers and refugees are effectively addressed and their rights are respected. Academics from the University of Sussex working on the Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Claims of Asylum (SOGICA) project, funded by the European Research Council, are calling for policymakers to implement these recommendations in order to render the CEAS fairer for SOGI asylum seekers.
Gender, Sexuality, Asylum and European Human Rights
Law and Critique, 2017
Asylum law functions through a dichotomy between an idealized notion of Europe as a site characterized by human rights, and non-European countries as sites of oppression. In most social sciences and humanities literature, this dichotomy is seen as legitimizing European dominance and exclusion of non-Europeans. However, it is the same dichotomy which is used by asylum seekers to claim inclusion through the grant of asylum. Focusing on the inclusive potential of this exclusive dichotomy allows us to explore the ambiguities inherent in the dichotomy. In asylum claims based on persecution on account of gender and sexuality, it becomes evident that not all human rights are considered equally fundamental. In many cases, asylum seekers are required to renounce human rights in order to prevent persecution, for example by complying with patriarchal family norms. Even where this requirement is rejected, asylum law illustrates the ambiguous relation between Europe and human rights.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.