On Some Weaknesses of Econometrics (Part 1)
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15525.56809…
5 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
We describe some limitations of econometrics, starting with one of the basic tools (simple linear regression), presenting how and why such methods do not necessarily seem to do what is purported by researchers investigating certain types of phenomena. We go through descriptive arguments with some mathematical intuition. The observations hint at why such methods might not work out of sample, which should motivate one to build more suitable methods. Assumptions should thus be verified before using econometric analyses.
Related papers
2007
Chapter 2 The Simple Linear Regression Model 39 Learning Objectives 39 Keywords 2.1 An Economic Model 2.2 An Econometric Model 2.2.1 Introducing the Error Term 2.3 Estimating the Regression Parameters 2.3.1 The Least Squares Principle 51 2.3.2 Estimates for the Food Expenditure Function 2.3.3 Interpreting the Estimates 2.3.3a Elasticities 2.3.3b Prediction 2.3.3c Computer Output 2.3.4 Other Economic Models 2.4 Assessing the Least Squares Estimators 2.4.1 The Estimator b 2 2.4.2 The Expected Values of b\\ and b 2 2.4.3 Repeated Sampling 2.4.4 The Variances and Covariance of b\\ and b 2 2.5 The Gauss-Markov Theorem 2.6 The Probability Distributions of the Least Squares Estimators 2.7 Estimating the Variance of the Error Term 2.7.1 Estimating the Variances and Covariance of the Least Squares Estimators 2.7.2 Calculations for the Food Expenditure Data 2.7.3 Interpreting the Standard Errors 2.8 Estimating Nonlinear Relationships 68 2.8.1 Quadratic Functions 69 2.8.2 Using a Quadratic Model 69 2.8.3 A Log-Linear Function 70 2.8.4 Using a Log-Linear Model 2.8.5 Choosing a Functional Form 73 2.9 Regression with Indicator Variables 74 2.10 Exercises 75 2.10.1 Problems 75 2.10.2 Computer Exercises 78 Appendix 2A Derivation of the Least Squares Estimates 83 Appendix 2B Deviation from the Mean Form of b 2 84 Appendix 2C b 2 Is a Linear Estimator 85 Appendix 2D Derivation of Theoretical Expression for b 2 85 Appendix 2E Deriving the Variance of b 2 86 Appendix 2F Proof of the Gauss-Markov Theorem 87 CONTENTS xiii Appendix 2G Monte Carlo Simulation 88 2G.1 The Regression Function 88 2G.2 The Random Error 89 2G.3 Theoretically True Values 90 2G.4 Creating a Sample of Data 91 2G.
2000
Test Statistics 4.3.2 Generalized Likelihood Ratio (GLR) Test 4.3.3 Properties of the GLR Test 4.3.4 Testing Hypotheses Relating to Linear Restrictions on β β β 4.3.5 Testing Linear Inequality Hypotheses 4.3.6 Bonferroni Joint Tests of Inequality and Equality Hypotheses about β β β 4.3.7 Testing Hypotheses about σ 2 4.4 Confidence Interval and Region Estimation 4.4.1 Meaning of "Confidence" Interval or Region 4.4.2 Rationale for the Use of Confidence Regions 4.4.3 Confidence Intervals, Regions, and Bounds for β β β 4.4.4 Confidence Bounds on σ 2 4.5
2006
As a unified discipline, econometrics is still relatively young and has been transforming and expanding very rapidly over the past few decades. Major advances have taken place in the analysis of cross sectional data by means of semi-parametric and non-parametric techniques. Heterogeneity of economic relations across individuals, firms and industries is increasingly acknowledged and attempts have been made to take them into account either by integrating out their effects or by modeling the sources of heterogeneity when suitable panel data exists. The counterfactual considerations that underlie policy analysis and treatment evaluation have been given a more satisfactory foundation. New time series econometric techniques have been developed and employed extensively in the areas of macroeconometrics and finance. Non-linear econometric techniques are used increasingly in the analysis of cross section and time series observations. Applications of Bayesian techniques to econometric problems have been given new impetus largely thanks to advances in computer power and computational techniques. The use of Bayesian techniques have in turn provided the investigators with a unifying framework where the tasks of forecasting, decision making, model evaluation and learning can be considered as parts of the same interactive and iterative process; thus paving the way for establishing the foundation of "real time econometrics". This paper attempts to provide an overview of some of these developments. JEL Classification: C1, C2, C3, C4, C5
Journal of Socio-economics, 2011
Econometrics is seen as the dominant method in terms of applicability, accuracy and efficiency in economic science. It is widely used and other methods have been reduced to marginal contributions. Econometricians behave as if their techniques were universal when in fact they are not. If alternative methods are accepted, one can largely eliminate the restrictions and distance to reality of econometrics. The article debates the pathways for a satisfactory economics in a context where theoretical and methodological pluralism is entering even in mainstream ideas. The historical construction of econometrics as the main method in economics and the limitations and possibilities of this tool are explored, underlining the need of pluralism.► This article debates the role of econometrics in economic science. ► The establishment of econometrics as a dominant technique in economics is explained. ► Central assumptions of the method are discussed. ► Opinions of several authors regarding methodological formalism are debated. ► Conclusions underline the need of pluralism to analyze economy today.
Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2002
2016
Summary We present a generalized LM test of heteroscedasticity allowing the presence of data transformation and a generalized LM test of functional form allowing the presence of heteroscedasticity. Both generalizations are meaningful as non-normality and heteroscedasticity are common in economic data. A joint test of functional form and heteroscedasticity is also given. These tests are further ‘studentized ’ to account for possible excess skewness and kurtosis of the errors in the model. All tests are easy to implement. They are based on the expected information and are shown to possess excellent finite sample properties. Several related tests are also discussed and their finite sample performances assessed. We found that our newly proposed tests significantly outperform the others, in particular in the cases where the errors are non-normal.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
References (2)
- Nassim Nicholas Taleb. "Fooled by Correlation: Com- mon Misinterpretations in Social "Science"". In: (July 11, 2019). URL: https://www.academia.edu/ 39797871 / Fooled _ by _ Correlation _ Common _ Misinterpretations_in_Social_Science_ (vis- ited on 07/23/2025).
- Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Statistical Consequences of Fat Tails: Real World Preasymptotics, Epistemology, and Applications. Nov. 14, 2022. DOI: 10 . 48550 / arXiv . 2001 . 10488. arXiv: 2001 . 10488[stat]. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10488 (vis- ited on 03/05/2025).