Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Toward a quantification of self-similarity in plants

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X05002805

Abstract

Self−similarity of plants has attracted the attention of biologists for at least 50 years, yet its formal treatment is rare, and no measure for quantifying the degree of self−similarity currently exists. We propose a formal definition and measures of self−similarity, tailored to branching plant structures. To evaluate self−similarity, we make use of an algorithm for computing topological distances between branching systems, developed in computer science. The formalism is illustrated using theoretical branching systems, and applied to analyze self−similarity in two sample plant structures: inflorescences of Syringa vulgaris (lilac) and shoots of Oryza sativa (rice).

References (39)

  1. Pascal Ferraro, Christophe Godin, and Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz: Toward a quantification of self-similarity in plants. Fractals 13(2), pp. 91-109. REFERENCES
  2. F. Hallé, R. Oldeman and P. Tomlinson, Tropi- cal Trees and Forests. An Architectural Analysis (Springer Verlag, New York, 1978).
  3. J. White, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10 (1979) 109.
  4. J. L. Harper, Population Biology of Plants (Aca- demic Press, London, 1977).
  5. D. Barthélémy, Acta Biotheor. 39 (1991) 309.
  6. P. M. Room, L. Maillette and J. Hanan, Adv. Ecol. Res. 25 (1994) 105.
  7. C. Godin and Y. Caraglio, J. Theor. Biol. 191 (1998) 1.
  8. P. de Reffye, C. Edelin, J. Françon, M. Jaeger and C. Puech, Plant models faithful to botanical struc- ture and development, in SIGGRAPH 1988 Confer- ence Proceedings (ACM Press, New York, Atlanta, GA, 1988) pp. 151-158.
  9. P. Prusinkiewicz and A. Lindenmayer, The Algorith- mic Beauty of Plants (Springer Verlag, New York, 1990).
  10. B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982).
  11. A. Arber, Natural Philosophy of Plant Form (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1950).
  12. W. Troll, Die infloreszenzen, Vol. 1 (Gustav Fisher Verlag, 1964).
  13. C. H. Schultz, Neues System der Morphologie der Pflanzen (Berlin, 1847).
  14. D. Frijters and A. Lindenmayer, Developmental descriptions of branching patterns with paracla- dial relationships, in Automata, Languages, Devel- opment, eds. A. Lindenmayer and G. Rozenberg (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1976) pp. 57-73.
  15. P. Prusinkiewicz, L. Mündermann, R. Karwowski and B. Lane, The use of positional information in the modeling of plants, in SIGGRAPH 2001 Con- ference Proceedings, Los Angeles, California (ACM Press, New York, 2001) pp. 289-300.
  16. L. Mündermann, Inverse Modeling of Plants, Ph.D. thesis, University of Calgary, 2003.
  17. P. Prusinkiewicz, Self-similarity in plants: integrat- ing mathematical and biological perspectives, in Toward a Quantification of Self-Similarity in Plants 109
  18. Thinking in Patterns: Fractals and Related Phenom- ena in Nature, ed. M. Novak (World Scientific, New Jersey, 2004) pp. 103-118.
  19. A. Lindenmayer, J. Theor. Biol. 18 (1968) 280.
  20. G. Herman, A. Lindenmayer and G. Rozenberg, Math. Syst. Theory 8 (1975) 316.
  21. L. Gatsuk, O. Smirnova, L. Zaugolnova and L. Zhukova, J. Ecophysiol. 68 (1980) 675.
  22. R. Nozeran, Integration of organismal development, in Positional Control in Plant Development, eds.
  23. P. W. Barlow and D. Carr (Cambridge University Press, UK, 1984), pp. 375-401.
  24. D. Barthélémy, Y. Caraglio and E. Costes, Architecture, gradients morphogénétiques et âge physiologique chez les végétaux, in Modélisation et Simulation de l'Architecture des Végétaux, eds. J. Bouchon, P. de Reffye and D. Barthélémy (Inra Éditions, Paris, 1997), pp. 11-87.
  25. P. de Reffye, P. Dinouard and D. Barthélémy, Architecture et modélisation de l'orme du Japon Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makino (Ulmaceae): la notion d'axe de référence, in De la Forêt Cul- tivée à l'Industrie de Demain: 3e Colloque Sciences et Industries du Bois, Arbora (Bordeaux, France, 1991), pp. 351-352.
  26. K. Zhang, Algorithmica 15 (1996) 205.
  27. P. Ferraro and C. Godin, Ann. Forest Sci. 57 (2000) 445.
  28. P. Ferraro and C. Godin, Algorithmica 36 (2003) 1.
  29. A. D. Bell, Plant Form: An Illustrated Guide to Flowering Morphology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1991).
  30. A. Ohmori and E. Tanaka, Syntact. Struct. Pattern Recognit. 45 (1988) 85.
  31. K. Zhang and T. Jiang, Inf. Process. Lett. 49 (1994) 249.
  32. R. Mech, R. Karwowski and B. Lane, Cpfg Version 4.0 User's Manual, 2004, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Available at http://www.algorithmicbotany.org/ lstudio/CPFGman.pdf
  33. P. Prusinkiewicz, Acta Horticult. 630 (2004) 15.
  34. C. Godin, E. Costes and H. Sinoquet, Plant archi- tecture modelling: virtual plants and complex sys- tems, in Plant Architecture and Its Manipulation, ed. C. Turnbull (Blackwell, 2005), pp. 237-286.
  35. C. Godin, Y. Guédon and E. Costes, Agronomie 19 (1999) 163.
  36. C. Pradal et al., ALEA: a software for integrating analysis and simulation tools for 3D architecture and ecophysiology, in Proceedings of the 4th Inter- national Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models, FSPM04, eds. C. Godin et al. (UMR AMAP, Montpellier, France, 2004), pp. 406-407.
  37. D. Barthélémy, C. Edelin and F. Hallé, Canopy architecture, in Physiology of Trees, ed.
  38. A. Raghavendra (John Wiley & Sons, 1991), pp. 1-20.
  39. C. Paul-Victor, Diversité Morphologique et Archi- tecturale de Quatre Variétés de riz (Oryza sativa et Oryza glaberrina), Master's thesis, University of Jussieu, Paris 6 (2004).