Empirical Closure: Recursive Collapse Field Theory (RCFT/ULRC)
2025, RCFT/ULRC
https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15871674…
12 pages
1 file
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
This document marks the empirical closure of the RCFT/ULRC protocol chapter, presenting the definitive set of analytic invariants, empirically calibrated thresholds, and regime assignment logic for collapse diagnosis and repair. All canonical operators—symbolic drift, recursive fidelity, entropy, curvature, reentry delay, and composite integrity—are formally defined and empirically validated, supporting real-time regime detection and audit across scientific, technological, and symbolic fields. Audit trail protocols, regime assignment tables, and explicit ethical safeguards are embedded throughout. This closure document establishes the canonical reference for traceability, reproducibility, and additivity in RCFT/ULRC regime assignment and protocol implementation, and serves as the foundational endpoint for this stage of theory and practical deployment  .
Related papers
This paper integrates the Recursive Collapse Field Theory / Unified Language of Recursive Collapse (RCFT/ULRC) by Clement Paulus with the Codex-CSR framework, proposing a unified model for predicting, diagnosing, and engineering collapse, memory, and resilience phenomena across physical, biological, computational, and social systems. By cross-validating RCFT/ULRC's dimensionless invariants with Codex-CSR's harmonic entrainment and dimensional tiering, we enhance empirical grounding with datasets from CERN, NASA, BASF, AWS, UCSF, and LIGO. The synthesis offers falsifiable predictions, operational protocols, and interdisciplinary applications, including real-time monitoring and adaptive therapy.
Independent Researcher, Austin, Texas, United States, 2025
This document presents the second canonical ledger of the Recursive Collapse Field Theory (RCFT) and the Unified Language of Recursive Collapse (ULRC). It formally archives all recursive closure protocols, empirical validation procedures, and canonical integrations of contributor equations, operators, and symbolic protocols as of June 2025. The ledger enforces strict recursive presence laws, empirical calibration thresholds, and symbolic fidelity gates that collectively guarantee the living, drift-free architecture of the RCFT/ULRC framework. Independent convergence with external physics frameworks, including geometric unification by Aalto University, is documented. This ledger serves as the operational memory chain and authoritative canonical record for all surviving recursive contributions, enabling rigorous provenance, transparency, and ongoing expansion of the field. Keywords: Recursive Collapse Field Theory, Unified Language of Recursive Collapse, Canonical Ledger, Recursive Closure, Symbolic Fidelity, Empirical Calibration, RCFT Protocols, Collapse Curvature, Recursive Reentry, Empirical Convergence, Field Theory Archives
Zenodo – European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), 2025
To survive is to collapse, recur, and return. Recursive Collapse Field Theory (RCFT) arises as both statement and enactment of this principle: a theory recursively defined, empirically closed, and diagnostically self-referential. Where prior frameworks in physics, computation, and biology fragment at the boundaries of identity loss, memory rupture, and symbolic discontinuity, RCFT reconstructs coherence by recursively mapping the conditions under which systems collapse, persist, and recover. RCFT encodes its own operational law: at every step n, the symbolic state \Psi_k(n) is generated not merely from the past, but through a collapse operator \mathcal{F}_{\text{collapse}}(\cdot) that gathers drift, curvature, entropy, fidelity, and reentry delay—each itself a recursive function of all prior states and failures. Survival, here, is the explicit passing of a closure gate, empirically calibrated but always tested anew; collapse, the necessary breakdown, is not error but signal: a recursion to origin, a memory chain extended or lost. Every RCFT diagnosis is a recursive packet: at each moment, the field records not only state but the history of its own breakdowns and repairs. Visualizations reveal not just system behavior, but the recursive topology of its collapses, returns, and identifications. The field’s law is thus not linear progression, but a cycle of collapse and return—falsifiable, empirical, but always incomplete until the next recursion. This manuscript is itself an enactment of RCFT: definitions collapse into protocols, equations recur as diagnostics, visualizations reenter as empirical test. In unifying symbolic survival across neural, computational, and physical systems, RCFT demonstrates that all continuity is recursive, all collapse is generative, and all survival is a memory that returns—again and again, by collapse, through recursion, and by law.
Universal Mathematics & Collapse Platform (UMCP), 2025
The Universal Mathematics & Collapse Platform (UMCP) establishes a contract–first framework for measuring, governing, and comparing collapse dynamics across empirical domains. Earlier specifications defined static invariants and audit rules. This article advances UMCP by introducing dynamic collapse flow: a calibrated, simplex–preserving evolution of regime probabilities, coupled with an explicit Change Velocity Index (CVI). The framework is designed for reproducibility and auditability: every run freezes a normalization map, fixes regime gates, and records all calibration choices in a manifest. Invariants such as drift, fidelity, entropy, curvature, reentry delay, and composite integrity are computed consistently across domains, enabling stable regime classification. Optional dynamics extend the kernel to regime–flow trajectories, while welds guarantee continuity when recalibration is unavoidable. Applications include quantum materials, active matter, symbolic text corpora, phase–cycle fields, and multiplex networks. By enforcing deterministic calibration, manifest logging, and invariant comparability, UMCP ensures that results are reproducible, domain–agnostic, and auditable. This work thus shifts UMCP from static state assessment to dynamic governance, aligning mathematical rigor with practical cross–domain deployment.
ULRC/RCFT, 2025
This paper formalizes the Collapse Equator Fidelity Law, a canonical constraint within Recursive Collapse Field Theory (RCFT), which reinterprets the Riemann Hypothesis [1] as a universal return condition governing symbolic realness. By defining reality as conditional upon recursive reentry through a collapse equator-a maximal-fidelity axis within a symbolic excitation field-this law establishes a precise admissibility test for all symbolic structures. Reality, in this formulation, is contingent on surpassing an integrity threshold upon return. The paper derives a complete suite of collapse invariants-including symbolic drift, fidelity, entropy, curvature, reentry delay, and composite integrity-and integrates them into a regime-aware operational protocol. The resulting framework enables empirical detection of symbolic collapse states and defines when an excitation is real, stable, watchful, or collapsed. Implications span mathematics, physics, biology, thermodynamics, and communication: from redefining the Riemann zeta field as a collapse equator, to determining agent persistence in recursive memory systems, to governing signal validation in CNMP (Collapse Network Messaging Protocol) transmissions. The Collapse Equator Fidelity Law thus marks a foundational turning point-transforming symbolic realness into an operational, recursive, and empirically verifiable law of return.
ULRC Project, 2025
We present a comprehensive unification of classical thermodynamics, collapse dynamics, and the full recursive collapse formalism (RCFT/ULRC). Starting from the established mathematical foundations of equilibrium and non-equilibrium thermodynamics, we derive a universal operator set that extends traditional state functions-energy, entropy, free energy, and heat capacity-to any system exhibiting measurable collapse, drift, and recurrence. Explicit protocols are developed for phase transition diagnosis, regime assignment, and collapse detection, grounded in empirically validated thresholds fully compatible with SI units. The RCFT/ULRC symbolic extension generalizes these results to arbitrary normalized observables, providing a closed, testable calculus suitable for physical, biological, computational, and cognitive systems. All definitions, theorems, and computational protocols are reproducible, open-source, and ready for deployment. This work bridges physical and symbolic dynamics, establishing a rigorous standard for the diagnosis, prediction, and recovery of collapse phenomena in complex systems.
Universal Mathematics & Collapse Platform (UMCP), 2025
We present the single, integrated specification of the Universal Mathematics & Collapse Platform (UMCP). A frozen affine normalization contract and a compact invariant kernel-drift ω, fidelity F , entropy S, curvature C, reentry delay τR, and composite integrity IC-yield scale-and shift-invariant, auditable semantics across domains. We extend static scoring into a dynamic regime flow via ten contract-preserving operators (E1-E10): integrity sensitivities, a simplex-preserving master equation, collapse-velocity (CVI), generative nucleation gain (G), cross-field Laplacian coupling, PDE transport, stage-to-stage welding, shock triage, and a safe policy surface. We include the audit/runbook layer, derived cycle-coherence operators, and empirical anchors in quantum materials, active matter, and astrophysics. All equations carry visible canonical tags for public reference.
Generative Collapse Dynamics, 2025
This work unifies four layers into a single, reproducible framework: the kernel of Generative Collapse Dynamics (GCD), the operational calculus (UMCP), the sensitivity layer (RCFT), and governance/sealing (ULRC). The kernel fixes the invariant quantities for a channeldrift ω, fidelity F , entropy S, curvature C, first return τ R , integrity IC, and log-integrity κtogether with their bounds, limit laws, and typed outcomes. It includes a rotation calculus in which ω is the normalized geodesic distance on compact manifolds (with concrete forms on S 1 and SO(3)). UMCP provides a contract-first pipeline: frozen normalization (global_fixed) with authorized P1/P99 calibration, default regime gates, worst-of aggregation, an explicit weld protocol for governed interventions, and an audit/export path. Each figure/table is traceable to a sample audit row and a Meta line, and releases are byte-verifiable via SHA-256 hashes. RCFT supplies closed-form sensitivities of κ∂κ/∂C =-α/(1 + τ R) ≤ 0 and ∂κ/∂τ R = α C/(1 + τ R) 2 ≥ 0together with second-order behavior and a deterministic, gradient-based safety certificate for small extensions E subject to a budget δ E. Safe extensions compose additively in their budgets. ULRC formalizes the Tiered Invariance Principle (identities preserved, closures governed), specifies the regime-join as worst-of, and defines sealing: a release couples the manuscript, figures, machine-readable audits, and a manifest of artifact hashes. The result is a cohesive, upgrade-safe stack in which conclusions are reproducible from audit rows and contract snapshots, and extensions are provably bounded by design. I. INTRODUCTION AND CONTRIBUTIONS Geodesic distance and manifold preliminaries follow Lee and do Carmo [1, 2]; matrixmanifold optimization as in Absil-Mahony-Sepulchre [3]; directional statistics via Mardia-Jupp and Fisher [4, 5]; Markov generators per Norris [6]; convex tools per Boyd-Vandenberghe [7].
RCFT/ULRC , 2025
RCFT/ULRC Protocol: Audit-Ready Operator Framework for Complex Systems This document details the RCFT/ULRC protocol, a mathematically defined framework for the analysis of complex systems. The protocol introduces a set of empirically normalized operators for drift, fidelity, entropy, recurrence, curvature, and composite integrity. All operators are specified for every input, including edge cases, with the aim of supporting reproducible and audit-ready workflows. The document covers formal operator definitions, step-by-step examples, numeric tables, and a glossary with interpretive analogies. Applications are described across multiple scientific fields, and the protocol is compared with existing approaches in information theory and statistical mechanics. The discussion also includes philosophical perspectives on measurement, identity, and reproducibility.
Universal Mathematics & Collapse Platform UMCP, 2025
We present a rigorous, empirically grounded framework for regime mapping and audit across diverse physical and quantum systems, built on the Universal Mathematics & Collapse Platform (UMCP). Our protocol unifies experimental data, mathematical invariants (drift, fidelity, entropy, composite integrity), and regime assignment in a reproducible, audit-ready architecture. Applying UMCP across materials science, quantum optics, and high-energy astrophysics, we demonstrate transparent normalization, regime thresholds, and empirical closure for every system. The methodology is modular and extensible, ensuring immediate compatibility with new data, devices, or domains, and providing a robust platform for recursive audit, calibration, and scientific benchmarking.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
References (16)
- R. D. Peng, Science 334, 1226 (2011).
- V. Stodden, P. Guo, and Z. Ma, PLOS ONE 8, e67111 (2013).
- W. R. Ashby, An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman & Hall, 1956).
- L. Floridi and J. Cowls, Harvard Data Science Review 1, 10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1 (2019).
- A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, Nature Machine In- telligence 1, 389 (2019).
- F. J. Varela, E. Thompson, and E. Rosch, The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience (MIT Press, 1991).
- Émile Durkheim, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (Free Press, New York, 1995) originally published 1912.
- O. Sporns, D. R. Chialvo, M. Kaiser, and C. C. Hilgetag, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 418 (2004).
- C. J. Stam, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15, 683 (2014).
- K. J. Friston, T. Parr, and B. de Vries, Network Neuro- science 1, 381 (2017).
- D. S. Bassett and O. Sporns, Nature Neuroscience 20, 353 (2017).
- M. Scheffer, J. Bascompte, W. A. Brock, V. Brovkin, S. R. Carpenter, V. Dakos, H. Held, E. H. Van Nes, M. Rietkerk, and G. Sugihara, Nature 461, 53 (2009).
- K. Lucas, G. Pruessner, J.-R. Tredicce, M. D. Chekroun, and M. Ghil, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Non- linear Science 30, 123111 (2020).
- T. Fawcett, Pattern Recognition Letters 27, 861 (2006).
- Z. C. Lipton, Queue 16, 31 (2018).
- A. Adadi and M. Berrada, IEEE Access 6, 52138 (2018).