Neoliberalisation of Higher Education
Abstract
This paper seeks to outline in very simple terms the concept of 'neoliberalism' and how this is impacting all aspects of the Higher Education enterprise. It argues the in essence neoliberalism in HE offers as a false conception of freedom and is essentially about strengthening the power of the managerial class, weakening the influence of workers and exploiting students who are turned into consumers.
FAQs
AI
What implications arise from the financialisation of higher education institutions?
The research indicates that financialisation has transformed universities into corporate entities focused on profit, undermining traditional educational missions. This shift includes increased student debt and the emergence of sub-prime degrees that fail to guarantee meaningful employment.
How does neoliberal management affect teaching and learning experiences in universities?
Neoliberal management has led to a consumerist pedagogy, where education is perceived as a product, compromising critical thinking. This approach emphasizes employability over intellectual rigor, reducing the university experience to a narrow focus on measurable outcomes.
What role do management evaluations play in the neoliberal education model?
The reliance on student feedback mechanisms often distorts teaching evaluations, prioritizing student satisfaction over educational quality. This trend can undermine academic integrity and teacher autonomy, as instructors may conform to consumer demands rather than academic standards.
What critiques exist regarding the ideology of neoliberalism in higher education?
Critics argue that neoliberalism promotes a detrimental view of education as merely a commodified service while fostering negative impacts on democratic participation and social equity. The ideology's focus on individualism diminishes collective values, further entrenching systemic inequalities.
How did the shift to a neoliberal model impact access to higher education?
The neoliberal model has exacerbated income inequality that corresponds with educational inequality, limiting access for marginalized groups. Evidence suggests that as education becomes commodified, participation may actually become more elitist and restricted.
References (15)
- Barnett, R. (1994) The Limits of Competence. Knowledge, Higher Education and Society. Open University Press, Buckingham.
- Boltanski, L and Chiapello, E (2007) The New Spirit of Capitalism. London, Verso.
- Cowden, S., & Singh, G. (2013). Acts of knowing: Critical pedagogy in, against and beyond the university. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
- Dorling, D. (2015). Injustice: Why Social Inequality Still Persists. Policy Press.
- Fanghanel, J. (2011). Being an academic. Routledge.
- Giroux, H. A. (2007). The university in chains: Confronting the military-- industrial--academic complex. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
- Hand, L. and Rowe, M. (2001) 'Evaluation of Student Feedback', Accounting Education 10(2): 147-60.
- Kember, D. and Wong, A. (2000) 'Implications for Evaluation from a Study of Students' Perceptions of Good and Poor Teaching', Higher Education 40: 69-97.
- Light, G., Calkins, S. and Cox, R. (2009) Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: The Refl ective Professional . Sage, London.
- McGettigan, A. (2013). The great university gamble: money, markets and the future of higher education.
- Meyer, J. and Land, R. (2005). 'Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (2): Epistemological Considerations and a Conceptual Framework for Teaching and Learning' Higher Education 49 (3): 373-88.
- Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Harvard Uni.
- Porter, S. R., Whitcomb, M. E. and Weitzer, W. H. (2004) 'Multiple Surveys of Students and Survey Fatigue', New Directions for Institutional Research 121: 63-73.
- Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat; The Dangerous New Class. Bloomsbury Academic, London and New York.
- Harman, C. (2012). Zombie capitalism: global crisis and the relevance of Marx. Haymarket Books.