Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Idioms: Formally Flexible but Semantically Non-transparent

2015

Abstract

Contrary to popular beliefs, idioms show a high degree of formal flexibility, ranging from word-like idioms to those which are like almost regular phrases. However, we argue that their meanings are not transparent, i.e. they are non-compositional, regardless of their syntactic flexibility. In this paper, firstly, we will introduce a framework to represent their syntactic flexibility, which is developed in Chae (2014), and will observe some consequences of the framework on the lexicon and the set of rules. Secondly, there seem to be some phenomena which can only be handled under the assumption that the component parts of idioms have their own separate meanings. However, we will show that all the phenomena, focusing on the behavior of idiom-internal adjectives, can be accounted for effectively without assuming separate meanings of parts, which confirms the non-transparency of idioms.

References (25)

  1. Chae, Hee-Rahk. 2014. A Representational System of Idiomatic Constructions: For the Building of Computational Resources. Linguistic Research, 31: 491-518.
  2. sentence semantically well-formed and that plays a role in the sentence's truth-conditions" (cf. Jackendoff 1997).
  3. Choi, Kyeong Bong. 2014. A Dictionary of Korean Idioms [written in Korean]. Ilchokak.
  4. Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  5. Culicover, Peter. 2009. Natural Language Syntax. Oxford Univ. Press.
  6. Culicover, Peter, and Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford Univ. Press.
  7. Espinal, M. Teresa, and Jaume Mateu. 2010. On Classes of Idioms and Their Interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42: 1397-1411.
  8. Everaert, Martin, Erik-Jan van der Linden, Andre Schenk, and Rob Schreuder, eds. 1995. Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  9. Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay and Mary C. O'Connor. 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone. Language, 64: 501-538.
  10. Geeraerts, Dirk. 1995. Specialization and Reinterpretation in Idioms. In Everaert et al. (1995).
  11. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1995. Idiomaticity and Human Cognition. In Everaert et al. (1995).
  12. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 2007. Idioms and Formulaic Language. In Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, eds. Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford Univ. Press.
  13. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Univ. of Chicago Press.
  14. Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. MIT Press.
  15. Nicolas, Tim. 1995. Semantics of Idiom Modification. In Everaert et al. (1995).
  16. No, Yongkyoon. 2002. A Dictionary of Basic Idioms on Grammatical Principles [written in Korean].
  17. Hankookmunhwasa.
  18. Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1978. The Pragmatics of Reference. Indiana Univ. Linguistics, Bloomington.
  19. Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1979. The Nonuniqueness of Semantic Solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 143-184.
  20. Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan Sag, and Thomas Wasow. 1994. Idioms. Language, 70: 491-538.
  21. Sag, Ivan, Timothy Baldwin, Francis Bond, Ann Copestake, and Dan Flickinger. 2002. Multiword Expressions: A Pain in the Neck for NLP. In Alexander Gelbuk, ed. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: Third International Conference (CICLing-2002). Springer-Verlag.
  22. Schenk, Andre. 1995. The Syntactic Behavior of Idioms. In Everaert et al. (1995).
  23. Ward, Gregory. 2004. Equatives and Deferred Reference. Language 80: 262-289.
  24. Wasow, Thomas, Ivan Sag, and Geoffrey Nunberg. 1983. Idioms: An Interim Report. In S. Hattori and K. Inoue, eds. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists. CIPL, Tokyo.
  25. Wulff, Stefanie. 2013. Words and Idioms. In Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford Univ. Press.