Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Visualising discourse coherence in non-linear document generation

2006

Abstract

In order to produce coherent linear documents, Natural Language Generation (NLG) systems have traditionally exploited the structuring role played by textual discourse markers such as relational and referential phrases. However, these coherence markers of the traditional notion of text do not work as efficiently in non-linear informative documents, where ambiguity and indeterminacy are usually undesirable. A new set of devices, not only textual but graphic, is therefore needed together with formation rules to govern their usage, supported by sound theoretical frameworks. While, in linear documents, graphic devices such as layout and formatting play a complementary role to textual devices in the expression of discourse coherence, we contend that in non-linear documents their role is much more important and needs to be adequately studied. In this paper, we present our work in progress, which explores new possibilities for achieving coherence in the automatic generation of hypertext documents.

References (27)

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Bernstein, M. (1998). Patterns of Hypertext. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext'98: Pittsburgh, PA, ACM Press, New York, pp.21-29
  3. Bernstein, M, Greco, D. (2002). Card Shark and Thepsis: Exotic Tools for Hypertext Narrative. In Wardrip-Fruin, N., Harrigan, P. (Eds.) First Person, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
  4. Bertin, J. (1967). Semiologie Graphique. English translation (1983). Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wiscounsin Press, Madison Bolter, J.D. (1991). Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing, Eastgate Systems, Cambridge MA Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York
  5. Campbell, K.S. (1995). Coherence, Continuity, and Cohesion. Theoretical Foundations for Document Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hillsdale (NJ), Hove (UK)
  6. Carter, L.M. (2000). Arguments in Hypertext: A Rhetorical Approach. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext '00, ACM Press, New York, pp.87-91
  7. Dijk, van T.A. (1977). Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. Longman, London -NY Douglas, J. Y. (1991). Understanding he Acto of Reading: the WOE Beginner's Guide Dissection. In Writing on the Edge, 2(2), pp.112-125
  8. Grimes, J.E. (1975). The Thread of Discourse. Mouton Publishers, Berlin, New York, Amsterdam Halliday, M.A.K., Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman
  9. Hobbs, J.R. (1985). On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse. Technical Report CSLI-85-37, Stanford Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  10. Kamp, H. and Ryle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  11. Knott, A., Dale, R. (1994). Using Linguistic Phenomena to Motivate a Set of Coherence Relations. In Discourse Processes, 18(1), pp.35-62
  12. Knott, A., Mellish, C. (1996). A feature-based account of the relations signalled by sentence and clause connectives. In Language and Speech, 39(2/3), pp.142-183
  13. Koch, W.G. (2000/2001). Jaques Bertin's Theory of Graphics and its Development and Influence on Multimedia Cartography. In Information Design Journal, 10(1), pp.37-43
  14. Kolb, D. (1997). Scholarly Hypertext: Self-Represented Complexity. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext '97, ACM Press, New York, pp.29-37
  15. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
  16. Landow, G.P. (1991). The Rhetoric of Hypermedia: Some Rules for Authors. In Delany, P., Landow, G.P. (Eds.) Hypermedia and Literary Studies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp.81-104
  17. Louwerse, M. (2001). An Analytic and Cognitive Parametrization of Coherence Relations. In Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (3), pp. 291- 315 Luesebrink, M. (1998). The Moment in Hypertext. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext '98, ACM Press, pp.106-112
  18. Mancini, C. (2005). Cinematic hypertext. Investigating a new paradigm. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  19. Mancini, C., Buckingham Shum, S. (2004). Towards Cinematic Hypertext. In Proceeding of ACM Hypertext '04, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Aug 9-13, ACM Press, New York, pp.115-124
  20. Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organisation. In Text, 8 (3), pp.243-281
  21. Martin, J.R. (1992). English Text. System and Structure. John Benjamins Publishing Co., Amsterdam Nunberg, G. (1990). The Linguistics of Ponctuation. CSLI, Stanford, USA Pander Maat, H. (1999). The Differential Linguistic Realisation of Comparative and Additive Coherence Relations. Cognitive Linguistics, 10, 147-184
  22. Piwek, P., Power, R., Scott, D., van Deemter, K. (2005) Generating multimedia presentations: from plain text to screenplay Intelligent Multimodal Information Presentation, Text Speech and Language Processing, vol. 27 pp. 203-226 O. Stock and M. Zancanaro (ed.) Kluwer: Dordrecht Power, R., Scott, D., Bouayad-Agha, N. (2003). Document Structure. Computational Linguistics, vol. 29 issue 4 pp. 211-260
  23. Riley, K., Parker, F. (1998). Parallels between visual and textual processing. IEEE Transactions on Professional. Communication, 41, 175-185.
  24. Sanders, T.J.M., Spooren, W.P.M., Noordman, L.G.M. (1993). Coherence Relations in a Cognitive Theory of Discourse Representation. In Cognitive Linguistics, 4(2), pp.93-133
  25. Saussure, F. (1922). Cours de Linguistique Générale. Editions Payot, Paris.
  26. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge University Press, New York
  27. Walker, J. (1999). Piecing Together and Tearing Apart: Finding the Story in afternoon. In Proceedings of ACM Hypertext '99, ACM Press, New York, pp.111-118.