Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Treatise on the Cálculus of Finite Differences

1860, Cambridge

Abstract

Here then we might say that as -j-is the fundamental ope- ration of the Differential Calculus, so -r-is the fundamental A# operation of the Calculus of Finite Differences. But there is a difference between the two cases which du ought to be noted. In the Differential Calculus -7-is not a true fraction, nor have du and dx any distinct meaning as symbols of quantity. The fractional form is adopted to express the limit to which a true fraction approaches. Hence -7-, and not d, there represents a real operation. But in the Aw Calculus of Finite Differences -r --is a true fraction. Its nu- Ax merator Au x stands for an actual magnitude. Hence A might itself be taken as the fundamental operation of this Calculus, always supposing the actual value of Ax to be given ; and the Calculus of Finite Differences might, in its symbolical character, be defined either as the science of the laws of the operation A, the value of Ax being supposed given, or as the science of the laws of the operation --. In consequence of the funda- LXX mental difference above noted between the Differential Calculus and the Calculus of Finite Differences, the term Finite ceases to be necessary as a mark of distinction. The former is a calculus of limits, not of differences. Though Ax admits of any constant value, the value usually given to it is unity. There are two reasons for this. First, the Calculus of Finite Differences has for its chief subject of application the terms of series. Now the law of a ART. 2.] OF FINITE DIFFERENCES. 3 series, however expressed, has for its ultimate object the deter- mination of the values of the successive terms as dependent upon their numerical order and position. Explicitly or im- plicitly, each term is a function of the integer which ex- presses its position in the series. And thus, to revert to language familiar in the Differential Calculus, the inde- pendent variable admits only of integral values whose com- mon difference is unity. In the series of terms I 2 9 2 q 2 A 2 the general or x th term is a? 2 . It is an explicit function of x. but the values of x are the series of natural numbers, and A#=l. Secondly. When the general term of a series is a function of an independent variable t whose successive differences are constant but not equal to unity, it is always possible to replace that independent variable by another, x, whose common difference shall be unity. Let <j> (t) be the general term of the series, and let At = h; then assuming t = hx we have At = hAx, whence Ax = 1. Thus it suffices to establish the rules of the calculus on the assumption that the finite difference of the independent variable is unity. At the same time it will be noted that this assumption reduces to equivalence the symbolsand A. We shall therefore in the following chapters develope the theory of the operation denoted by A and defined by the equation Au x = a x+1 -u x . But we shall where convenience suggests consider the more general operation

References (4)

  1. A Glossary of old English Bible Words with Illustrations. By J. EASTWOOD, M.A., St. John's College, Cambridge, and Incumbent of Hope in Hanley, Stafford, and W. ALDIS WRIGHT.
  2. M.A., Trinity College, Cambridge. [In the Press.
  3. A Brief Biographical Dictionary, For the Schools and General Readers. By the Rev. CHARLES HOLE. 1 8mo. [In the Press.
  4. *** Other Volumes will be announced in due course.