Distributed Private Constraint Optimization
2008, 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology
https://doi.org/10.1109/WIIAT.2008.426Abstract
We merge two popular optimization criteria of Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs)reward-based utility and privacy -into a single criterion. Privacy requirements on constraints has classically motivated an optimization criterion of minimizing the number of disclosed tuples, or maximizing the entropy about constraints. Common complete DCOP search techniques seek solutions minimizing the cost and maintaining some privacy. We start from the observation that for some problems we could provide as input a quantification of loss of privacy in terms of cost. We provide a formal way to integrate this new input parameter into the DCOP framework, discuss its implications and advantages.
References (19)
- I. Brito and P. Meseguer. Distributed forward checking may lie for privacy. In CP DCR Workshop, 2007.
- M. Franzin, F. Rossi, F. E.C., and R. Wallace. Multi- agent meeting scheduling with preferences: efficiency, pri- vacy loss, and solution quality. Computational Intelligence, 20(2), 2004.
- E. Freuder, M. Minca, and R. Wallace. Privacy/efficiency tradeoffs in distributed meeting scheduling by constraint- based agents. In Proc. IJCAI DCR, pages 63-72, 2001.
- R. Greenstadt, B. Grosz, and M. D. Smith. SSDPOP: Im- proving the privacy of PDCOP with secret sharing. 2007.
- Y. Hamadi. Interleaved backtracking in distributed con- straint networks. In ICTAI, pages 33-41, 2001.
- S. Kraus and J. Wilkenfeld. The function of time in cooper- ative negotiations. In AAAI, pages 179-184, 1991.
- R. T. Maheswaran, J. P. Pearce, E. Bowring, P. Varakantham, and M. Tambe. Privacy loss in distributed constraint reason- ing: A quantitative framework for analysis and its applica- tions. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Sys- tems (JAAMAS), 2006.
- R. Mailler and V. Lesser. Solving distributed constraint opti- mization problems using cooperative mediation. In AAMAS, pages 438-445, 2004.
- P. Meseguer and M. Jiménez. Distributed forward checking. In CP'2000 Distributed Constraint Satisfaction Workshop, 2000.
- P. J. Modi, W.-M. Shen, M. Tambe, and M. Yokoo. ADOPT: Asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with qual- ity guarantees. AIJ, 161, 2005.
- A. Petcu and B. Faltings. A scalable method for multiagent constraint optimization. In IJCAI, 2005.
- M.-C. Silaghi. Incentive auctions and stable marriages prob- lems solved with privacy of human preferences. Techni- cal Report TR-FIT-11/2004, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL, July 2004.
- M.-C. Silaghi and B. Faltings. A comparison of DisCSP algorithms with respect to privacy. In AAMAS-DCR, 2002.
- M.-C. Silaghi, B. Faltings, and A. Petcu. Secure combinato- rial optimization using DFS-based variable elimination. In Symposium on AI and Maths, January 2006.
- M.-C. Silaghi and V. Rajeshirke. The effect of policies for selecting the solution of a DisCSP on privacy loss. In AA- MAS, pages 1396-1397, 2004.
- M.-C. Silaghi, M. Zanker, and R. Bartak. Desk-mates (stable matching) with privacy of preferences, and a new distributed CSP framework. In Proc. of CP'2004 Immediate Applica- tions of Constraint Programming Workshop, 2004.
- B. Sinervo and C. M. Livley. The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 340:240-243, 1996.
- R. Wallace and M.-C. Silaghi. Using privacy loss to guide decisions in distributed CSP search. In FLAIRS'04, 2004.
- M. Yokoo, E. H. Durfee, T. Ishida, and K. Kuwabara. The distributed constraint satisfaction problem: Formalization and algorithms. IEEE TKDE, 10(5):673-685, 1998.