What Vietnam Can Offer America
2017, The National Interest
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
This article reviews the trajectories of U.S. policy toward Vietnam and Vietnam’s policy toward the United States to understand the underlying forces that have formed the plateau on which the U.S.-Vietnam engagement operates. It recommends a proposal to make both America and Vietnam great again.
Related papers
Southeast Asian Affairs 2010. Ed. by Daljit Singh (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2010), 2010
Who are the key players of Vietnamese politics? What characterizes its dynamics? What is to be expected of it in the next few years? This essay is an attempt to address the above questions. It suggests that the Vietnamese government is caught primarily between regime conservatives, modernizers, rent-seekers, and China. The politics of Vietnam is featuring four dynamics including the confluence of money, power, and world views, the crisis of Vietnam's growth model, the rise of mainstream elite civil society, and Vietnam's efforts to self-help in China's backyard. This essay will outline the contours of Vietnamese politics through an examination of its four players and four features, illustrated by events and developments throughout 2009. It concludes with forecasts about Vietnam's economic, domestic, and foreign policy in the near future.
Journal of Conflict Studies, 1986
2019
Under the Obama administration’s Rebalance to Asia, Vietnam gradually gained importance in U.S. foreign policy as the two countries formed a “comprehensive partnership” in 2013. Despite the Trump administration’s America First policy, the United States prioritizes its partnerships with Vietnam and other Southeast Asian countries in its Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy. While a common concern about China’s behavior in the South China Sea has facilitated the growth of U.S.-Vietnam relations, the foundation of the relationship is cooperation on Vietnam War legacy issues. The two countries have made remarkable progress in advancing diplomatic, economic, and defense ties regardless of remaining challenges. The year 2020 would be ideal for the United States and Vietnam to upgrade the relationship to a “strategic partnership”: it marks the 25th anniversary of the normalization of bilateral relations, Hanoi’s ASEAN chairmanship, and the start of Vietnam’s term as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.
Oxford Brookes University, 2013
In my research paper I am going to attempt to understand what went wrong in Vietnam using the various explanations as well as looking at any similar underlying assumptions that they have, and finally discussing what explanations are left un-said. In part one I will critically engage with various accounts and explanations detailing what went wrong in the Vietnam War. I will argue that there are various dominant explanations for what went wrong in Vietnam, particularly military and political arguments. As well as arguing that there are other explanations that do not feature in the literature, such as the lack of understanding regarding Vietnamese history and culture. In part two I will also look at whether the explanations share any basic underlying assumptions and discuss the implications of this; in addition to this I will also look at what is left unquestioned in the explanations.
Diplomacy and Statecraft, 2025
This article analyses the progress of the Republic of Vietnam (RVN)'s foreign policy during the Vietnam War (1965-1973). The major hypothesis of this research is that South Vietnamese diplomats attempted to align with their partners and, distinct from the United States (US)' administration, to do two missions: fighting against communism and elevating its position in the international milieu. This paper employs a wealth of source materials housed at the National Archives Centre II, Vietnam and the method of historiography to chronologically historicise two phases. From 1965 to 1968, South Vietnamese diplomats enlisted the munificent support of Free World Military Forces and stressed the importance of military collaboration, though the regime started referring to civic aspects. However, the 1969-1973 phase saw a growth of civic collaboration and deeper integration of the RVN in international organisations and forums. This action purposefully appealed for financial support and world opinion to a higher degree of diplomatic recognition so that it would blaststrategic military and propaganda of Communists at the Paris Conference.

Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.